Community and societal influences on loneliness and social isolation among young adults: a systematic review of observational studies.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Drew Eleanor Meehan, Anne Grunseit, Neta HaGani, Dafna Merom
{"title":"Community and societal influences on loneliness and social isolation among young adults: a systematic review of observational studies.","authors":"Drew Eleanor Meehan, Anne Grunseit, Neta HaGani, Dafna Merom","doi":"10.1093/epirev/mxag007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Loneliness and social isolation are emerging public health concerns among young adults, yet the role of community and societal factors remains poorly understood. Existing research has predominantly focused on individual or interpersonal determinants. This systematic review synthesized observational evidence on community- and societal-level factors associated with loneliness and social isolation among young adults aged 18-30 years. Five databases were searched for observational studies examining place-based community or societal exposures and loneliness or social isolation outcomes. Thirteen eligible studies were identified, and a structured narrative synthesis was undertaken. The exposure variables explored were diverse. Neighborhood characteristics (including trust, safety, and atmosphere), community participation, cultural and societal norms, and structural conditions demonstrated consistent associations with loneliness. Greater neighborhood cohesion, safety, and belonging were protective, whereas neighborhood disorder, minority status, perceived discrimination, and individualistic cultural orientations were associated with greater loneliness. Evidence for social isolation was sparse and methodologically heterogeneous, though area-level disadvantage and remoteness showed emerging relevance. Most studies had a cross-sectional design, and the ways loneliness and social isolation were measured across studies were heterogenous. Community and societal determinants meaningfully shape young adults' experiences of loneliness, but evidence for social isolation remains limited. Findings highlight the need for longitudinal research, improved consistency in the use of measurement tools, and further examination of moderators between individual factors and community influences, which will all contribute to the development of multilevel public health strategies addressing structural and neighborhood conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50510,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologic Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13148868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxag007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Loneliness and social isolation are emerging public health concerns among young adults, yet the role of community and societal factors remains poorly understood. Existing research has predominantly focused on individual or interpersonal determinants. This systematic review synthesized observational evidence on community- and societal-level factors associated with loneliness and social isolation among young adults aged 18-30 years. Five databases were searched for observational studies examining place-based community or societal exposures and loneliness or social isolation outcomes. Thirteen eligible studies were identified, and a structured narrative synthesis was undertaken. The exposure variables explored were diverse. Neighborhood characteristics (including trust, safety, and atmosphere), community participation, cultural and societal norms, and structural conditions demonstrated consistent associations with loneliness. Greater neighborhood cohesion, safety, and belonging were protective, whereas neighborhood disorder, minority status, perceived discrimination, and individualistic cultural orientations were associated with greater loneliness. Evidence for social isolation was sparse and methodologically heterogeneous, though area-level disadvantage and remoteness showed emerging relevance. Most studies had a cross-sectional design, and the ways loneliness and social isolation were measured across studies were heterogenous. Community and societal determinants meaningfully shape young adults' experiences of loneliness, but evidence for social isolation remains limited. Findings highlight the need for longitudinal research, improved consistency in the use of measurement tools, and further examination of moderators between individual factors and community influences, which will all contribute to the development of multilevel public health strategies addressing structural and neighborhood conditions.

社区和社会对年轻人孤独感和社会隔离的影响:观察性研究的系统回顾。
孤独和社会孤立是年轻人中正在出现的公共卫生问题,但社区和社会因素的作用仍然知之甚少。现有的研究主要集中在个人或人际决定因素上。本系统综述综合了与18-30岁年轻人孤独感和社会隔离相关的社区和社会层面因素的观察证据。我们检索了5个数据库,寻找考察基于地点的社区或社会暴露与孤独或社会隔离结果的观察性研究。确定了13项符合条件的研究,并进行了结构化的叙述综合。研究的暴露变量多种多样。邻里特征(包括信任、安全和氛围)、社区参与、文化和社会规范以及结构条件显示出与孤独的一致关联。较高的邻里凝聚力、安全感和归属感具有保护作用,而邻里混乱、少数民族地位、感知到的歧视和个人主义文化取向则与更大的孤独感有关。社会孤立的证据很少,方法上也各不相同,尽管地区一级的不利条件和地处偏远显示出新的相关性。大多数研究在设计上是横断面的,并且在研究中测量孤独和社会隔离的方法是异质性的。社区和社会决定因素有意地塑造了年轻人的孤独经历,但社会孤立的证据仍然有限。调查结果强调需要进行纵向研究,提高测量工具使用的一致性,进一步检查个人因素与社区影响之间的调节因素,这些都将有助于制定解决结构和社区条件的多层次公共卫生战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiologic Reviews
Epidemiologic Reviews 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Epidemiologic Reviews is a leading review journal in public health. Published once a year, issues collect review articles on a particular subject. Recent issues have focused on The Obesity Epidemic, Epidemiologic Research on Health Disparities, and Epidemiologic Approaches to Global Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书