Replicating Evidence in a New Context: A Cross-Sectional Study of Multidomain Quality of Life in Serbian Prisons.

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Milena Milićević
{"title":"Replicating Evidence in a New Context: A Cross-Sectional Study of Multidomain Quality of Life in Serbian Prisons.","authors":"Milena Milićević","doi":"10.1177/0306624X261428715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional study assessed Quality of Life (QOL) using the WHOQOL-BREF among 600 prisoners (14% female, 71% in closed regimes) across five large Serbian facilities, aiming to replicate and extend international findings. Four QOL domains and their correlates, gender differences, and the contributions of each domain to overall QOL were examined. Mean scores ranged from 55.48 (environmental) to 67.02 (psychological), with overall QOL averaging below 60. Regression analysis revealed that physical health was the strongest predictor of overall QOL (β = .35), followed by environmental QOL (β = .32), diverging from U.S. data, and that males reported significantly higher QOL than females. While partially replicating earlier data, these findings provide the first detailed QOL profile of Serbian prisoners and reveal context-specific differences in correlates and demographic patterns. These findings fill a major geographical gap, confirm that QOL is profoundly compromised, and underscore the need for environment- and health-oriented prison reforms in Serbia.</p>","PeriodicalId":48041,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology","volume":" ","pages":"1645-1670"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X261428715","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This cross-sectional study assessed Quality of Life (QOL) using the WHOQOL-BREF among 600 prisoners (14% female, 71% in closed regimes) across five large Serbian facilities, aiming to replicate and extend international findings. Four QOL domains and their correlates, gender differences, and the contributions of each domain to overall QOL were examined. Mean scores ranged from 55.48 (environmental) to 67.02 (psychological), with overall QOL averaging below 60. Regression analysis revealed that physical health was the strongest predictor of overall QOL (β = .35), followed by environmental QOL (β = .32), diverging from U.S. data, and that males reported significantly higher QOL than females. While partially replicating earlier data, these findings provide the first detailed QOL profile of Serbian prisoners and reveal context-specific differences in correlates and demographic patterns. These findings fill a major geographical gap, confirm that QOL is profoundly compromised, and underscore the need for environment- and health-oriented prison reforms in Serbia.

在新的背景下复制证据:塞尔维亚监狱中多领域生活质量的横断面研究。
这项横断面研究使用WHOQOL-BREF评估了塞尔维亚五个大型设施的600名囚犯(14%为女性,71%为封闭制度)的生活质量(QOL),旨在复制和推广国际研究结果。研究了四个生活质量领域及其相关性、性别差异以及每个领域对总体生活质量的贡献。平均得分从55.48(环境)到67.02(心理)不等,总体生活质量平均低于60。回归分析显示,身体健康是总体生活质量的最强预测因子(β =。35),其次为环境生活质量(β =。32),与美国的数据不同,男性报告的生活质量明显高于女性。虽然部分复制了早期的数据,但这些发现提供了塞尔维亚囚犯的第一个详细的生活质量概况,并揭示了相关因素和人口统计模式的具体背景差异。这些调查结果填补了一个重大的地理差距,证实生活质量受到严重损害,并强调塞尔维亚需要进行以环境和健康为导向的监狱改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Press/Politics is an interdisciplinary journal for the analysis and discussion of the role of the press and politics in a globalized world. The Journal is interested in theoretical and empirical research on the linkages between the news media and political processes and actors. Special attention is given to the following subjects: the press and political institutions (e.g. the state, government, political parties, social movements, unions, interest groups, business), the politics of media coverage of social and cultural issues (e.g. race, language, health, environment, gender, nationhood, migration, labor), the dynamics and effects of political communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书