Ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: Spatiotemporal characteristics, trade-offs/synergies, and driving factors.

IF 3.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Zhihao Tao, Youzhi An, Peng Zhao, Huili Bao
{"title":"Ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: Spatiotemporal characteristics, trade-offs/synergies, and driving factors.","authors":"Zhihao Tao, Youzhi An, Peng Zhao, Huili Bao","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ecosystem services (ES) play a vital role in socioeconomic development. Existing research has primarily focused on single-service assessments and linear relationships, overlooking often neglecting non-linear interactions, threshold effects, and spatial heterogeneity among ES. The Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) was analyzed to evaluate water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), carbon storage (CS), habitat quality (HQ), and total ecosystem services (TES). Methods including constraint lines, geographically weighted regression, and machine learning were applied to systematically identify spatiotemporal evolution patterns, interrelationships, and driving factors of ES. The results indicate that: (1) From 2005 to 2020, ES in the YREB exhibited marked spatiotemporal variability; WY and SC increased over time, whereas CS, HQ, and TES declined. Spatially, SC, CS, and HQ were consistently higher in western and southern regions, while WY followed a southeast-to-northwest decreasing gradient. (2) Relationships between ES revealed distinct dynamics: CS-HQ, WY-CS, and SC-CS were dominated by trade-offs, whereas WY-SC, WY-HQ, and SC-HQ displayed synergies with constraint effects, demonstrating pronounced spatial heterogeneity. (3) Annual precipitation and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) significantly enhanced their positive driving effects on TES after exceeding their respective critical thresholds. Conversely, the influence of built-up area proportions sharply reversed from an initially positive effect to a strongly negative one once a threshold was crossed. These findings provide a scientific basis for ecological conservation strategies and regional sustainable development, advancing comprehensive assessment and management of ecosystem services.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":"1094-1106"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecosystem services (ES) play a vital role in socioeconomic development. Existing research has primarily focused on single-service assessments and linear relationships, overlooking often neglecting non-linear interactions, threshold effects, and spatial heterogeneity among ES. The Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) was analyzed to evaluate water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), carbon storage (CS), habitat quality (HQ), and total ecosystem services (TES). Methods including constraint lines, geographically weighted regression, and machine learning were applied to systematically identify spatiotemporal evolution patterns, interrelationships, and driving factors of ES. The results indicate that: (1) From 2005 to 2020, ES in the YREB exhibited marked spatiotemporal variability; WY and SC increased over time, whereas CS, HQ, and TES declined. Spatially, SC, CS, and HQ were consistently higher in western and southern regions, while WY followed a southeast-to-northwest decreasing gradient. (2) Relationships between ES revealed distinct dynamics: CS-HQ, WY-CS, and SC-CS were dominated by trade-offs, whereas WY-SC, WY-HQ, and SC-HQ displayed synergies with constraint effects, demonstrating pronounced spatial heterogeneity. (3) Annual precipitation and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) significantly enhanced their positive driving effects on TES after exceeding their respective critical thresholds. Conversely, the influence of built-up area proportions sharply reversed from an initially positive effect to a strongly negative one once a threshold was crossed. These findings provide a scientific basis for ecological conservation strategies and regional sustainable development, advancing comprehensive assessment and management of ecosystem services.

长江经济带生态系统服务:时空特征、权衡/协同效应及驱动因素
生态系统服务在社会经济发展中发挥着至关重要的作用。现有的研究主要集中在单一服务评估和线性关系上,忽视了通常忽略的非线性相互作用、阈值效应和ES之间的空间异质性。对长江经济带(YREB)进行了水量(WY)、土壤保持(SC)、碳储量(CS)、生境质量(HQ)和生态系统总服务功能(TES)评价。采用约束线、地理加权回归和机器学习等方法,系统识别ES的时空演化模式、相互关系和驱动因素。结果表明:(1)2005 - 2020年,长江经济带ES具有明显的时空变异性。随着时间的推移,WY和SC增加,而CS, HQ和TES下降。从空间上看,西部和南部地区的SC、CS和HQ均较高,而WY则呈东南-西北递减的趋势。(2) ES之间的关系呈现出明显的动态变化,CS-HQ、WY-CS和SC-CS以权衡效应为主,而WY-SC、WY-HQ和SC-HQ则表现出协同效应和约束效应,具有明显的空间异质性。(3)年降水量大于0.25和归一化植被指数大于0.46显著增强了TES的正驱动因子。大于0.49的建成区面积比例由负向正。夜间照明指数和建成区比例成为主要的负面驱动因素。研究结果为制定生态保护战略和区域可持续发展提供了科学依据,促进了生态系统服务功能的综合评价与管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESTOXICOLOGY&nbs-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas: Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making Health and ecological risk and impact assessment Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems Sustaining ecosystems Managing large-scale environmental change Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society: Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书