{"title":"Ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: Spatiotemporal characteristics, trade-offs/synergies, and driving factors.","authors":"Zhihao Tao, Youzhi An, Peng Zhao, Huili Bao","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ecosystem services (ES) play a vital role in socioeconomic development. Existing research has primarily focused on single-service assessments and linear relationships, overlooking often neglecting non-linear interactions, threshold effects, and spatial heterogeneity among ES. The Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) was analyzed to evaluate water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), carbon storage (CS), habitat quality (HQ), and total ecosystem services (TES). Methods including constraint lines, geographically weighted regression, and machine learning were applied to systematically identify spatiotemporal evolution patterns, interrelationships, and driving factors of ES. The results indicate that: (1) From 2005 to 2020, ES in the YREB exhibited marked spatiotemporal variability; WY and SC increased over time, whereas CS, HQ, and TES declined. Spatially, SC, CS, and HQ were consistently higher in western and southern regions, while WY followed a southeast-to-northwest decreasing gradient. (2) Relationships between ES revealed distinct dynamics: CS-HQ, WY-CS, and SC-CS were dominated by trade-offs, whereas WY-SC, WY-HQ, and SC-HQ displayed synergies with constraint effects, demonstrating pronounced spatial heterogeneity. (3) Annual precipitation and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) significantly enhanced their positive driving effects on TES after exceeding their respective critical thresholds. Conversely, the influence of built-up area proportions sharply reversed from an initially positive effect to a strongly negative one once a threshold was crossed. These findings provide a scientific basis for ecological conservation strategies and regional sustainable development, advancing comprehensive assessment and management of ecosystem services.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":"1094-1106"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ecosystem services (ES) play a vital role in socioeconomic development. Existing research has primarily focused on single-service assessments and linear relationships, overlooking often neglecting non-linear interactions, threshold effects, and spatial heterogeneity among ES. The Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) was analyzed to evaluate water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), carbon storage (CS), habitat quality (HQ), and total ecosystem services (TES). Methods including constraint lines, geographically weighted regression, and machine learning were applied to systematically identify spatiotemporal evolution patterns, interrelationships, and driving factors of ES. The results indicate that: (1) From 2005 to 2020, ES in the YREB exhibited marked spatiotemporal variability; WY and SC increased over time, whereas CS, HQ, and TES declined. Spatially, SC, CS, and HQ were consistently higher in western and southern regions, while WY followed a southeast-to-northwest decreasing gradient. (2) Relationships between ES revealed distinct dynamics: CS-HQ, WY-CS, and SC-CS were dominated by trade-offs, whereas WY-SC, WY-HQ, and SC-HQ displayed synergies with constraint effects, demonstrating pronounced spatial heterogeneity. (3) Annual precipitation and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) significantly enhanced their positive driving effects on TES after exceeding their respective critical thresholds. Conversely, the influence of built-up area proportions sharply reversed from an initially positive effect to a strongly negative one once a threshold was crossed. These findings provide a scientific basis for ecological conservation strategies and regional sustainable development, advancing comprehensive assessment and management of ecosystem services.
期刊介绍:
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas:
Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making
Health and ecological risk and impact assessment
Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems
Sustaining ecosystems
Managing large-scale environmental change
Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society:
Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation
Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability
Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability
Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.