The Treatment Burden for Multimorbidity Scale: A Development and Psychometric Validation Study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Kyoung Suk Lee, Jihyang Lee, Minji Kim, Rooheui Shin
{"title":"The Treatment Burden for Multimorbidity Scale: A Development and Psychometric Validation Study.","authors":"Kyoung Suk Lee, Jihyang Lee, Minji Kim, Rooheui Shin","doi":"10.1111/nhs.70318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Existing instruments have limitations in comprehensively capturing multimorbidity treatment burden. This study aimed to develop and validate a new measure, the Treatment Burden for Multimorbidity Scale (TBMS). We developed preliminary items based on the literature review and existing instruments. Content validity was evaluated with experts and patients. A longitudinal survey design was used for psychometric testing, with data collected at baseline (n = 503) and at 6-month follow-up (n = 313). We examined reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the TBMS. One item was deleted after the content validity evaluation, resulting in 12 items. Factor analyses revealed two domains (healthcare tasks and impacts) aligned with the conceptual definition. Cronbach's alpha for the total scale was 0.93. TBMS scores significantly correlated with scores of the disease burden, an existing multimorbidity treatment burden measure, and self-care as hypothesized. Changes in TBMS scores over 6 months were associated with changes in self-care, depressive symptoms, physical function, and self-rated health. The TBMS demonstrates sound reliability, validity, and responsiveness, making it a valuable tool for assessing multimorbidity treatment burden in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49730,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Health Sciences","volume":"28 1","pages":"e70318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12989467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.70318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing instruments have limitations in comprehensively capturing multimorbidity treatment burden. This study aimed to develop and validate a new measure, the Treatment Burden for Multimorbidity Scale (TBMS). We developed preliminary items based on the literature review and existing instruments. Content validity was evaluated with experts and patients. A longitudinal survey design was used for psychometric testing, with data collected at baseline (n = 503) and at 6-month follow-up (n = 313). We examined reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the TBMS. One item was deleted after the content validity evaluation, resulting in 12 items. Factor analyses revealed two domains (healthcare tasks and impacts) aligned with the conceptual definition. Cronbach's alpha for the total scale was 0.93. TBMS scores significantly correlated with scores of the disease burden, an existing multimorbidity treatment burden measure, and self-care as hypothesized. Changes in TBMS scores over 6 months were associated with changes in self-care, depressive symptoms, physical function, and self-rated health. The TBMS demonstrates sound reliability, validity, and responsiveness, making it a valuable tool for assessing multimorbidity treatment burden in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多病量表的治疗负担:一项发展和心理计量学验证研究。
现有工具在全面捕捉多病治疗负担方面存在局限性。本研究旨在开发和验证一种新的测量方法,即多病治疗负担量表(TBMS)。我们在文献综述和现有工具的基础上制定了初步项目。与专家、患者共同评价内容效度。采用纵向调查设计进行心理测试,在基线(n = 503)和6个月随访(n = 313)时收集数据。我们检验了TBMS的信度、结构效度和反应性。内容效度评估后,删除1项,共12项。因素分析揭示了与概念定义一致的两个领域(医疗保健任务和影响)。总量表的Cronbach's alpha为0.93。TBMS得分与疾病负担、现有的多病治疗负担测量和假设的自我保健得分显著相关。6个月内TBMS评分的变化与自我护理、抑郁症状、身体功能和自评健康状况的变化有关。颅磁刺激显示出良好的可靠性、有效性和响应性,使其成为临床实践中评估多病治疗负担的有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NHS has a multidisciplinary focus and broad scope and a particular focus on the translation of research into clinical practice, inter-disciplinary and multidisciplinary work, primary health care, health promotion, health education, management of communicable and non-communicable diseases, implementation of technological innovations and inclusive multicultural approaches to health services and care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书