{"title":"Individuals with unilateral chronic ankle instability exhibit deficits in bilateral postural control, muscle strength and proprioception.","authors":"Yujing Cao, Qi Wang, Yanhao Liu, Xinmeng Zhang, Wenqi Ran, Junjun Li, Wen Jing, Qipeng Song","doi":"10.1080/14763141.2026.2643338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate whether people with unilateral chronic ankle instability (CAI) have deficits in bilateral static and dynamic postural control, ankle muscle strength and ankle proprioception. A total of 31 participants with CAI and 31 non-CAI controls were recruited. Static postural control was assessed using root mean square (RMS) of the plantar centre of pressure (CoP) displacements during single-leg stance. Dynamic postural control was evaluated by measuring the time to stabilisation (TTS) following a single-leg drop onto a force plate. Ankle proprioception and muscle strength were measured using a proprioception testing device and an isokinetic dynamometer. A linear mixed-effects model of variance was used to examine the group (CAI vs. non-CAI) and limb (affected vs. unaffected) effects and interactions adjusting for activity level, limb dominant and injured side. Compared to non-CAI, those participants with unilateral CAI exhibited greater CoP-RMS(<sub>ML</sub>) bilaterally (F = 4.392, <i>p</i> = 0.0038); longer TTS bilaterally (4.102 ≤ F ≤ 10.558, 0.002 ≤ p ≤ 0.048); less ankle muscle strength bilaterally (43.126 ≤ F ≤ 5.505, 0.022 ≤ p < 0.001); and larger ankle proprioceptive thresholds bilaterally (26.159 ≤ F ≤ 8.413, 0.005 ≤ p < 0.001). Individuals with unilateral CAI exhibit bilateral deficits in static postural control, dynamic postural control, muscle strength and proprioception. CAI rehabilitation strategies should adopt comprehensive bilateral rehabilitation approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":49482,"journal":{"name":"Sports Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"1377-1394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2026.2643338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To investigate whether people with unilateral chronic ankle instability (CAI) have deficits in bilateral static and dynamic postural control, ankle muscle strength and ankle proprioception. A total of 31 participants with CAI and 31 non-CAI controls were recruited. Static postural control was assessed using root mean square (RMS) of the plantar centre of pressure (CoP) displacements during single-leg stance. Dynamic postural control was evaluated by measuring the time to stabilisation (TTS) following a single-leg drop onto a force plate. Ankle proprioception and muscle strength were measured using a proprioception testing device and an isokinetic dynamometer. A linear mixed-effects model of variance was used to examine the group (CAI vs. non-CAI) and limb (affected vs. unaffected) effects and interactions adjusting for activity level, limb dominant and injured side. Compared to non-CAI, those participants with unilateral CAI exhibited greater CoP-RMS(ML) bilaterally (F = 4.392, p = 0.0038); longer TTS bilaterally (4.102 ≤ F ≤ 10.558, 0.002 ≤ p ≤ 0.048); less ankle muscle strength bilaterally (43.126 ≤ F ≤ 5.505, 0.022 ≤ p < 0.001); and larger ankle proprioceptive thresholds bilaterally (26.159 ≤ F ≤ 8.413, 0.005 ≤ p < 0.001). Individuals with unilateral CAI exhibit bilateral deficits in static postural control, dynamic postural control, muscle strength and proprioception. CAI rehabilitation strategies should adopt comprehensive bilateral rehabilitation approaches.
期刊介绍:
Sports Biomechanics is the Thomson Reuters listed scientific journal of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (ISBS). The journal sets out to generate knowledge to improve human performance and reduce the incidence of injury, and to communicate this knowledge to scientists, coaches, clinicians, teachers, and participants. The target performance realms include not only the conventional areas of sports and exercise, but also fundamental motor skills and other highly specialized human movements such as dance (both sport and artistic).
Sports Biomechanics is unique in its emphasis on a broad biomechanical spectrum of human performance including, but not limited to, technique, skill acquisition, training, strength and conditioning, exercise, coaching, teaching, equipment, modeling and simulation, measurement, and injury prevention and rehabilitation. As well as maintaining scientific rigour, there is a strong editorial emphasis on ''reader friendliness''. By emphasising the practical implications and applications of research, the journal seeks to benefit practitioners directly.
Sports Biomechanics publishes papers in four sections: Original Research, Reviews, Teaching, and Methods and Theoretical Perspectives.