The most influential factors in the psychological impact of an abnormal cervical screening result: A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.9 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Health Psychology Open Pub Date : 2026-03-13 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20551029261432387
David Del Valle, Ane Murillo, Nuria Torres, Idoia Saenz, Gloria Agesta, Edurne Arenaza, Antonia Dávila, Cristina Sarasqueta, Irene Diez-Itza
{"title":"The most influential factors in the psychological impact of an abnormal cervical screening result: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"David Del Valle, Ane Murillo, Nuria Torres, Idoia Saenz, Gloria Agesta, Edurne Arenaza, Antonia Dávila, Cristina Sarasqueta, Irene Diez-Itza","doi":"10.1177/20551029261432387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To identify factors associated with higher levels of anxiety and poorer quality of life in women with abnormal results in a cervical screening programme. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 140 women aged 25-65 years with abnormal cervical screening results referred to the Cervical Pathology Clinic at Donostia University Hospital between May and November 2022. Anxiety and quality of life were assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Human Papillomavirus-related Quality of Life (HPV-QoL) questionnaire, respectively. Multivariable linear regression models were used to identify factors independently associated with emotional outcomes. Higher state anxiety (STAI-S) was independently associated with greater baseline trait anxiety (STAI-T) (<i>p</i> < 0.001), a first positive HPV result (<i>p</i> = 0.05), and low-to-medium educational level (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Among HPV-positive women, poorer HPV-related quality of life was independently associated with higher baseline trait anxiety (<i>p</i> = 0.008) and lower educational level (<i>p</i> = 0.032). Baseline anxiety is the strongest determinant of emotional impact after an abnormal cervical screening result, followed by first-time HPV positivity and lower educational level<b>,</b> highlighting the multifactorial nature of emotional responses in cervical screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":55856,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"20551029261432387"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12988306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20551029261432387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To identify factors associated with higher levels of anxiety and poorer quality of life in women with abnormal results in a cervical screening programme. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 140 women aged 25-65 years with abnormal cervical screening results referred to the Cervical Pathology Clinic at Donostia University Hospital between May and November 2022. Anxiety and quality of life were assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Human Papillomavirus-related Quality of Life (HPV-QoL) questionnaire, respectively. Multivariable linear regression models were used to identify factors independently associated with emotional outcomes. Higher state anxiety (STAI-S) was independently associated with greater baseline trait anxiety (STAI-T) (p < 0.001), a first positive HPV result (p = 0.05), and low-to-medium educational level (p = 0.03). Among HPV-positive women, poorer HPV-related quality of life was independently associated with higher baseline trait anxiety (p = 0.008) and lower educational level (p = 0.032). Baseline anxiety is the strongest determinant of emotional impact after an abnormal cervical screening result, followed by first-time HPV positivity and lower educational level, highlighting the multifactorial nature of emotional responses in cervical screening.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

影响子宫颈筛查结果异常心理影响的主要因素:一项横断面研究。
在子宫颈筛查项目中发现异常结果的妇女,确定与焦虑程度较高和生活质量较差相关的因素。在2022年5月至11月期间,在多诺斯蒂亚大学医院宫颈病理诊所就诊的140名25-65岁宫颈筛查结果异常的女性进行了横断面研究。焦虑和生活质量分别采用状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)和人乳头瘤病毒相关生活质量问卷(HPV-QoL)进行评估。多变量线性回归模型用于识别与情绪结果独立相关的因素。较高的状态焦虑(STAI-S)与较高的基线特征焦虑(STAI-T) (p < 0.001)、首次HPV阳性结果(p = 0.05)和中低教育水平(p = 0.03)独立相关。在hpv阳性女性中,较差的hpv相关生活质量与较高的基线特征焦虑(p = 0.008)和较低的教育水平(p = 0.032)独立相关。基线焦虑是子宫颈筛查结果异常后情绪影响的最强决定因素,其次是首次HPV阳性和教育程度较低,这突出了子宫颈筛查中情绪反应的多因素性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology Open
Health Psychology Open Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology Open (HPO) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online-only journal providing rapid publication. HPO is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge research in health psychology from around the world. HPO seeks to provide a platform for both traditional empirical analyses and more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches to health psychology. All areas of health psychology are covered, but these topics are of particular interest: Clinical health psychology Critical health psychology Community health psychology Health psychology practice Health psychology through a social, cultural or regional lens The journal particularly favours papers that focus on health psychology in practice, including submissions concerning community and/or clinical applications and interventions. Review articles are also welcomed. There is no fixed limit to the length of manuscripts, which is normally strictly limited in other journals, for example HPO’s sister journal, Journal of Health Psychology (JHP). Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书