Influence of different chelating agents on the microhardness, surface roughness, and adhesion of biodentine to root dentin.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of oral science Pub Date : 2026-04-16 Epub Date: 2026-03-14 DOI:10.2334/josnusd.25-0372
Aslı Özdemir, Mevlüt S Ocak
{"title":"Influence of different chelating agents on the microhardness, surface roughness, and adhesion of biodentine to root dentin.","authors":"Aslı Özdemir, Mevlüt S Ocak","doi":"10.2334/josnusd.25-0372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This in vitro study evaluated the effects of different chelating agents on dentin properties influencing the adhesion of calcium silicate-based biomaterials. The effects of 9% etidronic acid and 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles on the microhardness, surface roughness, and push-out bond strength of Biodentine were assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-five extracted maxillary incisors were divided into three groups according to the final irrigation protocol: 9% 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate (HEBP), 0.2% chitosan, or 0.9% saline (control). Dentin microhardness (Vickers hardness number) and surface roughness (Ra, µm) were measured before and after irrigation. For push-out testing, standardized cavities in 60 dentin discs were filled with Biodentine and stored for 24 h at 37°C and 100% humidity. Failure modes were examined under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD), Kruskal-Wallis, and paired t-tests (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups showed a significant reduction in microhardness (P < 0.001), with the greatest reduction observed in HEBP. Surface roughness increased significantly and was highest in HEBP (P < 0.001). Push-out bond strength was higher in HEBP than control (P < 0.01), with no difference between HEBP and chitosan (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both agents improved Biodentine adhesion; however, chitosan caused milder dentin alterations, indicating greater potential for dentin preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral science","volume":" ","pages":"71-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.25-0372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This in vitro study evaluated the effects of different chelating agents on dentin properties influencing the adhesion of calcium silicate-based biomaterials. The effects of 9% etidronic acid and 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles on the microhardness, surface roughness, and push-out bond strength of Biodentine were assessed.

Methods: Seventy-five extracted maxillary incisors were divided into three groups according to the final irrigation protocol: 9% 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate (HEBP), 0.2% chitosan, or 0.9% saline (control). Dentin microhardness (Vickers hardness number) and surface roughness (Ra, µm) were measured before and after irrigation. For push-out testing, standardized cavities in 60 dentin discs were filled with Biodentine and stored for 24 h at 37°C and 100% humidity. Failure modes were examined under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD), Kruskal-Wallis, and paired t-tests (P < 0.05).

Results: All groups showed a significant reduction in microhardness (P < 0.001), with the greatest reduction observed in HEBP. Surface roughness increased significantly and was highest in HEBP (P < 0.001). Push-out bond strength was higher in HEBP than control (P < 0.01), with no difference between HEBP and chitosan (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Both agents improved Biodentine adhesion; however, chitosan caused milder dentin alterations, indicating greater potential for dentin preservation.

不同螯合剂对生物牙本质显微硬度、表面粗糙度及与牙根黏附的影响。
目的:研究不同螯合剂对牙本质特性的影响及对硅酸钙基生物材料黏附性的影响。考察了9%地替膦酸和0.2%壳聚糖纳米颗粒对生物奥登汀显微硬度、表面粗糙度和推出键强度的影响。方法:将75颗拔除的上颌切牙按最终冲洗方案分为3组:9% 1-羟乙基二膦酸盐(HEBP)、0.2%壳聚糖和0.9%生理盐水(对照)。冲洗前后测定牙本质显微硬度(维氏硬度数)和表面粗糙度(Ra,µm)。在推出测试中,将60个牙本质盘的标准空腔填充生物牙本质碱,并在37℃和100%湿度下保存24小时。在体视显微镜下观察了失效模式。数据分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)、双因素显著性差异分析(HSD)、Kruskal-Wallis检验和配对t检验(P < 0.05)。结果:各组显微硬度均显著降低(P < 0.001),以HEBP降低幅度最大。表面粗糙度显著增加,HEBP组最高(P < 0.001)。HEBP组的推出粘结强度高于对照组(P < 0.01),与壳聚糖组无显著差异(P < 0.05)。结论:两种药物均能改善生物妥妥碱的粘附性;然而,壳聚糖引起的牙本质改变较轻,表明其具有更大的保存牙本质的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of oral science
Journal of oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书