{"title":"Influence of different chelating agents on the microhardness, surface roughness, and adhesion of biodentine to root dentin.","authors":"Aslı Özdemir, Mevlüt S Ocak","doi":"10.2334/josnusd.25-0372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This in vitro study evaluated the effects of different chelating agents on dentin properties influencing the adhesion of calcium silicate-based biomaterials. The effects of 9% etidronic acid and 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles on the microhardness, surface roughness, and push-out bond strength of Biodentine were assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-five extracted maxillary incisors were divided into three groups according to the final irrigation protocol: 9% 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate (HEBP), 0.2% chitosan, or 0.9% saline (control). Dentin microhardness (Vickers hardness number) and surface roughness (Ra, µm) were measured before and after irrigation. For push-out testing, standardized cavities in 60 dentin discs were filled with Biodentine and stored for 24 h at 37°C and 100% humidity. Failure modes were examined under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD), Kruskal-Wallis, and paired t-tests (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups showed a significant reduction in microhardness (P < 0.001), with the greatest reduction observed in HEBP. Surface roughness increased significantly and was highest in HEBP (P < 0.001). Push-out bond strength was higher in HEBP than control (P < 0.01), with no difference between HEBP and chitosan (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both agents improved Biodentine adhesion; however, chitosan caused milder dentin alterations, indicating greater potential for dentin preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral science","volume":" ","pages":"71-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.25-0372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This in vitro study evaluated the effects of different chelating agents on dentin properties influencing the adhesion of calcium silicate-based biomaterials. The effects of 9% etidronic acid and 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles on the microhardness, surface roughness, and push-out bond strength of Biodentine were assessed.
Methods: Seventy-five extracted maxillary incisors were divided into three groups according to the final irrigation protocol: 9% 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate (HEBP), 0.2% chitosan, or 0.9% saline (control). Dentin microhardness (Vickers hardness number) and surface roughness (Ra, µm) were measured before and after irrigation. For push-out testing, standardized cavities in 60 dentin discs were filled with Biodentine and stored for 24 h at 37°C and 100% humidity. Failure modes were examined under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD), Kruskal-Wallis, and paired t-tests (P < 0.05).
Results: All groups showed a significant reduction in microhardness (P < 0.001), with the greatest reduction observed in HEBP. Surface roughness increased significantly and was highest in HEBP (P < 0.001). Push-out bond strength was higher in HEBP than control (P < 0.01), with no difference between HEBP and chitosan (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Both agents improved Biodentine adhesion; however, chitosan caused milder dentin alterations, indicating greater potential for dentin preservation.