Ex-vivo evaluation of intratubular antibacterial activity and biocompatibility of two hydraulic calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of oral science Pub Date : 2026-04-16 Epub Date: 2026-03-16 DOI:10.2334/josnusd.25-0024
Carlo Gaeta, Federica Veneri, Giulia Malvicini, Jessika Bertacchini, Francesco Cavani, Omar Shanableh, Eva Tollapi, Chiara Falciani, Simone Grandini, Luigi Generali
{"title":"Ex-vivo evaluation of intratubular antibacterial activity and biocompatibility of two hydraulic calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers.","authors":"Carlo Gaeta, Federica Veneri, Giulia Malvicini, Jessika Bertacchini, Francesco Cavani, Omar Shanableh, Eva Tollapi, Chiara Falciani, Simone Grandini, Luigi Generali","doi":"10.2334/josnusd.25-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the antibacterial activity of two hydraulic calcium silicate-based sealers, NeoSealer Flo and AH Plus Bioceramic, against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) biofilm and their biocompatibility with pre-osteoblastic cells.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one extracted human lower incisors with single canals were inoculated with E. faecalis, and their root canals were subjected to three types of filling: A) NeoSealer Flo (n = 10), B) AH Plus Bioceramic (n = 10), and C) positive control (n = 10), as well as one negative control. The teeth were embedded in resin and sectioned at their coronal, middle, and apical thirds, yielding 160 sections. Bacterial viability was assessed by confocal laser scanning microscopy using LIVE/DEAD staining. Biocompatibility was evaluated using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NeoSealer Flo and AH Plus Bioceramic showed comparable antibacterial activity. In the coronal third of the tooth, viable bacteria were estimated at 44.1 ± 4.0% and 43.5 ± 4.0%, respectively, versus 85.7 ± 5.2% in controls. Similar results were obtained in the middle and apical thirds. Viability was significantly higher in the coronal third (P < 0.05). No significant differences in cell number or protein expression were observed between the sealers and the controls (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both sealers demonstrated similar antibacterial effectiveness and biocompatibility, with greater bacterial viability in the coronal region.</p>","PeriodicalId":16646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral science","volume":" ","pages":"51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.25-0024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the antibacterial activity of two hydraulic calcium silicate-based sealers, NeoSealer Flo and AH Plus Bioceramic, against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) biofilm and their biocompatibility with pre-osteoblastic cells.

Methods: Thirty-one extracted human lower incisors with single canals were inoculated with E. faecalis, and their root canals were subjected to three types of filling: A) NeoSealer Flo (n = 10), B) AH Plus Bioceramic (n = 10), and C) positive control (n = 10), as well as one negative control. The teeth were embedded in resin and sectioned at their coronal, middle, and apical thirds, yielding 160 sections. Bacterial viability was assessed by confocal laser scanning microscopy using LIVE/DEAD staining. Biocompatibility was evaluated using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Results: NeoSealer Flo and AH Plus Bioceramic showed comparable antibacterial activity. In the coronal third of the tooth, viable bacteria were estimated at 44.1 ± 4.0% and 43.5 ± 4.0%, respectively, versus 85.7 ± 5.2% in controls. Similar results were obtained in the middle and apical thirds. Viability was significantly higher in the coronal third (P < 0.05). No significant differences in cell number or protein expression were observed between the sealers and the controls (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Both sealers demonstrated similar antibacterial effectiveness and biocompatibility, with greater bacterial viability in the coronal region.

两种液压硅酸钙基根管密封剂的管内抗菌活性和生物相容性的体外评价。
目的:研究了两种液压硅酸钙基密封材料NeoSealer Flo和AH Plus生物陶瓷对粪肠球菌(E. faecalis)生物膜的抗菌活性及其与成骨前细胞的生物相容性。方法:用粪肠杆菌接种31例拔出的人单根管下切牙,对其根管进行3种充填:A) NeoSealer Flo (n = 10), B) AH Plus bioc陶瓷(n = 10), C)阳性对照(n = 10)和阴性对照(1)。将牙包埋在树脂中,在冠状、中间和根尖三分之一处切片,共160片。采用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜LIVE/DEAD染色法评估细菌活力。采用比辛胆酸蛋白测定法和十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳法评价其生物相容性。结果:NeoSealer Flo与AH Plus生物陶瓷具有相当的抗菌活性。在牙冠三分之一处,活菌估计分别为44.1±4.0%和43.5±4.0%,而对照组为85.7±5.2%。在中间和根尖三分之一处也得到了类似的结果。冠状三分之一的存活率显著高于其他部位(P < 0.05)。在细胞数量和蛋白表达方面,实验组与对照组差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:两种封口剂具有相似的抗菌效果和生物相容性,冠状区细菌活力更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of oral science
Journal of oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书