Characterization of Late-Life Hoarding Symptomology Among Rural Adults.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Gerontologist Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-15 DOI:10.1080/07317115.2026.2643628
Jarrod Williams, Mary E Dozier
{"title":"Characterization of Late-Life Hoarding Symptomology Among Rural Adults.","authors":"Jarrod Williams, Mary E Dozier","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2026.2643628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Extant research on hoarding has largely taken place in urban settings, preventing generalizations to rural communities. Thus, our objective was to provide a profile of late life rural hoarding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a survey distributed at community presentations (<i>N</i> = 97) and data from baseline assessments administered as part of larger treatment outcome studies for geriatric hoarding (<i>N</i> = 55).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the community sample, 33% of participants scored above the clinical cutoff on a brief screening measure. Of the older adults diagnosed with hoarding disorder, 65% lived with at least one other person and 49% were married, a strong contrast to urban samples. Participants who lived alone had higher levels of clutter than those who lived with at least one other person, but did not report higher levels of subjective hoarding symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While rurality might lead to lower clutter levels in primary rooms in the home, it does not affect the overall volume of clutter that has accumulated, nor the subjectively experienced level of distress.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Our rural sample differed substantially from urban samples on characteristics that should be considered by clinicians when forming their case conceptualization for late life hoarding patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"542-557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2026.2643628","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Extant research on hoarding has largely taken place in urban settings, preventing generalizations to rural communities. Thus, our objective was to provide a profile of late life rural hoarding.

Methods: We used data from a survey distributed at community presentations (N = 97) and data from baseline assessments administered as part of larger treatment outcome studies for geriatric hoarding (N = 55).

Results: On the community sample, 33% of participants scored above the clinical cutoff on a brief screening measure. Of the older adults diagnosed with hoarding disorder, 65% lived with at least one other person and 49% were married, a strong contrast to urban samples. Participants who lived alone had higher levels of clutter than those who lived with at least one other person, but did not report higher levels of subjective hoarding symptoms.

Conclusions: While rurality might lead to lower clutter levels in primary rooms in the home, it does not affect the overall volume of clutter that has accumulated, nor the subjectively experienced level of distress.

Clinical implications: Our rural sample differed substantially from urban samples on characteristics that should be considered by clinicians when forming their case conceptualization for late life hoarding patients.

农村成年人晚年囤积症的症状特征。
目的:现有的关于囤积的研究主要是在城市环境中进行的,防止将其推广到农村社区。因此,我们的目标是提供晚年农村囤积的概况。方法:我们使用了来自社区报告的调查数据(N = 97)和来自基线评估的数据,这些数据是老年囤积症治疗结果研究的一部分(N = 55)。结果:在社区样本中,33%的参与者在简短的筛查措施中得分高于临床临界值。在被诊断患有囤积症的老年人中,65%的人至少与另一个人住在一起,49%的人已婚,这与城市样本形成了鲜明对比。独居的参与者比那些至少和一个人住在一起的人有更高的杂乱程度,但没有更高的主观囤积症状。结论:虽然乡村性可能会导致家中主要房间的杂乱程度降低,但它不会影响累积的杂乱总量,也不会影响主观经历的痛苦程度。临床意义:我们的农村样本与城市样本在特征上存在很大差异,临床医生在形成晚年囤积患者的病例概念时应考虑这些特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Gerontologist
Clinical Gerontologist GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including: -adjustments to changing roles- issues related to diversity and aging- family caregiving- spirituality- cognitive and psychosocial assessment- depression, anxiety, and PTSD- Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders- long term care- behavioral medicine in aging- rehabilitation and education for older adults. Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书