Influence of left main-left circumflex artery angle on long-term outcomes in crossover stenting for ostial left circumflex artery lesions: insights from the Multicenter CROSS-LCX Registry.
Ezgi Gültekin Güner, Ebru Serin, Muhammed Furkan Deniz, Sezer Markirt, Mehmet Erdoğan, Kurtuluş Karaüzüm, Semih Kalkan, Ali Nazmi Çalik, Serkan Asil, Veysel Ozan Tanik, Ahmet Anil Başkurt, Fatih Levent, Faruk Kara, Enes Arslan, Cemalettin Akman, Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici, Özge Çebi, Uygar Çağdaş Yüksel, İbrahim Faruk Aktürk, Kudret Keskin, İrfan Şahin, Ahmet Güner, Fatih Uzun
{"title":"Influence of left main-left circumflex artery angle on long-term outcomes in crossover stenting for ostial left circumflex artery lesions: insights from the Multicenter CROSS-LCX Registry.","authors":"Ezgi Gültekin Güner, Ebru Serin, Muhammed Furkan Deniz, Sezer Markirt, Mehmet Erdoğan, Kurtuluş Karaüzüm, Semih Kalkan, Ali Nazmi Çalik, Serkan Asil, Veysel Ozan Tanik, Ahmet Anil Başkurt, Fatih Levent, Faruk Kara, Enes Arslan, Cemalettin Akman, Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici, Özge Çebi, Uygar Çağdaş Yüksel, İbrahim Faruk Aktürk, Kudret Keskin, İrfan Şahin, Ahmet Güner, Fatih Uzun","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The influence of left main bifurcation angles on cardiovascular outcomes following crossover stent implantation (CSI) in patients with ostial left circumflex artery (LCX) lesions has not been well established. This investigation sought to determine the relationship between left main bifurcation angles and poor cardiovascular outcomes in patients who underwent CSI of ostial LCX lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This large-scale, multicenter ( n = 14) observational, retrospective study included 267 patients [men: 192 (71.9%), mean age: 66.30 ± 10.93 years] who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with CSI for ostial LCX lesions. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, target vessel revascularization, and target vessel myocardial infarction. Patients were categorized into two groups as MACE (+) and MACE (-).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At least one MACE occurred in 49 patients (18.3%) in the study cohort. The left main-LCX angle (108.44 ± 17.93° vs. 115.89 ± 14.760°, P = 0.041) was significantly lower in the MACE (+) group compared to the MACE (-) group. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, increased left main-LCX angle was identified as one of the independent predictors of MACE (hazard ratios: 0.968, P = 0.005). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, a left main-LCX angle lower than 99° predicted the presence of MACE with a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 75% (area under the curve: 0.721, 95% confidence interval: 0.663-0.774, P < 0.001). The prevalence of MACE was notably higher in patients with left main-LCX angle <99° as compared to others (53.3 vs. 11.3%, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This multicenter study shows that a narrow left main-LCX angle (99°) value may be associated with poor cardiovascular events in patients who underwent CSI for ostial LCX disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":"449-460"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001631","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The influence of left main bifurcation angles on cardiovascular outcomes following crossover stent implantation (CSI) in patients with ostial left circumflex artery (LCX) lesions has not been well established. This investigation sought to determine the relationship between left main bifurcation angles and poor cardiovascular outcomes in patients who underwent CSI of ostial LCX lesions.
Methods: This large-scale, multicenter ( n = 14) observational, retrospective study included 267 patients [men: 192 (71.9%), mean age: 66.30 ± 10.93 years] who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with CSI for ostial LCX lesions. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, target vessel revascularization, and target vessel myocardial infarction. Patients were categorized into two groups as MACE (+) and MACE (-).
Results: At least one MACE occurred in 49 patients (18.3%) in the study cohort. The left main-LCX angle (108.44 ± 17.93° vs. 115.89 ± 14.760°, P = 0.041) was significantly lower in the MACE (+) group compared to the MACE (-) group. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, increased left main-LCX angle was identified as one of the independent predictors of MACE (hazard ratios: 0.968, P = 0.005). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, a left main-LCX angle lower than 99° predicted the presence of MACE with a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 75% (area under the curve: 0.721, 95% confidence interval: 0.663-0.774, P < 0.001). The prevalence of MACE was notably higher in patients with left main-LCX angle <99° as compared to others (53.3 vs. 11.3%, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: This multicenter study shows that a narrow left main-LCX angle (99°) value may be associated with poor cardiovascular events in patients who underwent CSI for ostial LCX disease.
期刊介绍:
Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management.
Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.