Calibration of the GOCE accelerometers by GPS- and SLR-based precise orbit determination

IF 4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
P. N. A. M. Visser, J. A. A. van den IJssel, C. Siemes
{"title":"Calibration of the GOCE accelerometers by GPS- and SLR-based precise orbit determination","authors":"P. N. A. M. Visser, J. A. A. van den IJssel, C. Siemes","doi":"10.1007/s00190-026-02046-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ESA GOCE satellite carried a gravity gradiometer consisting of three pairs of accelerometers on mutually orthogonal axes. For each accelerometer, bias and scale factors have been re-estimated by a dynamic precise orbit determination (POD) using improved gravity field modeling and standards. The kinematic orbit solution included in GPS-based Precise Science Orbit (PSO) product served as the baseline observables for 1210 daily arcs, covering the period from 1 November 2009 to 20 October 2013. Implementing improved force models almost completely resolved the deviations of the <jats:italic>Y</jats:italic> -axis scale factor obtained in earlier work (Visser and Ijssel 2016). A novel aspect is the verification by comparison with dynamic POD solutions based on SLR observations using 51 two-day orbital arcs. A high level of consistency was obtained between the kinematic PSO- and SLR-based accelerometer calibration parameters, e.g. within 0.01 nm/s <jats:inline-formula> <jats:alternatives> <jats:tex-math>$$^{ 2}$$</jats:tex-math> <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> </jats:alternatives> </jats:inline-formula> for the <jats:italic>X</jats:italic> -axis pointing predominantly in the flight direction in terms of bias. One set of accelerometer scale factors was estimated for the entire mission. These were found to be consistent to within 0.005 for all accelerometer axes. The three-dimensional consistency between the dynamic orbits and the PSO reduced-dynamic orbit solutions has a mean Root-Mean-Square (RMS) of 4.5 and 10 cm, respectively, for the PSO reduced-dynamic and SLR-based dynamic orbit solutions. In addition, the one-dimensional RMS-of-fit of the PSO kinematic orbit solution improved significantly from 6.9 in Visser and Ijssel (2016) to 2.6 cm.","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-026-02046-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ESA GOCE satellite carried a gravity gradiometer consisting of three pairs of accelerometers on mutually orthogonal axes. For each accelerometer, bias and scale factors have been re-estimated by a dynamic precise orbit determination (POD) using improved gravity field modeling and standards. The kinematic orbit solution included in GPS-based Precise Science Orbit (PSO) product served as the baseline observables for 1210 daily arcs, covering the period from 1 November 2009 to 20 October 2013. Implementing improved force models almost completely resolved the deviations of the Y -axis scale factor obtained in earlier work (Visser and Ijssel 2016). A novel aspect is the verification by comparison with dynamic POD solutions based on SLR observations using 51 two-day orbital arcs. A high level of consistency was obtained between the kinematic PSO- and SLR-based accelerometer calibration parameters, e.g. within 0.01 nm/s $$^{ 2}$$ 2 for the X -axis pointing predominantly in the flight direction in terms of bias. One set of accelerometer scale factors was estimated for the entire mission. These were found to be consistent to within 0.005 for all accelerometer axes. The three-dimensional consistency between the dynamic orbits and the PSO reduced-dynamic orbit solutions has a mean Root-Mean-Square (RMS) of 4.5 and 10 cm, respectively, for the PSO reduced-dynamic and SLR-based dynamic orbit solutions. In addition, the one-dimensional RMS-of-fit of the PSO kinematic orbit solution improved significantly from 6.9 in Visser and Ijssel (2016) to 2.6 cm.
基于GPS和slr精确定轨的GOCE加速度计定标
欧空局GOCE卫星携带的重力梯度仪由相互正交轴上的三对加速度计组成。利用改进的重力场模型和标准,通过动态精确定轨(POD)对每个加速度计的偏差和尺度因子进行了重新估计。基于gps的精确科学轨道(PSO)产品中包含的运动学轨道解作为2009年11月1日至2013年10月20日1210日弧的基线观测值。实施改进的力模型几乎完全解决了早期工作中获得的Y轴比例因子的偏差(Visser和Ijssel 2016)。一个新颖的方面是通过与基于51个两天轨道弧的单反观测的动态POD解决方案进行比较验证。在运动学PSO和基于slr的加速度计校准参数之间获得了高度的一致性,例如,在0.01 nm/s $$^{ 2}$$ 2内,X轴主要指向飞行方向。为整个任务估计了一组加速度计尺度因子。这些被发现是一致的0.005内所有加速度计轴。基于PSO的动态轨道简化解和基于slr的动态轨道简化解的三维一致性均方根(RMS)分别为4.5 cm和10 cm。此外,PSO运动学轨道解的一维拟合均方根从Visser和Ijssel(2016)的6.9显著提高到2.6 cm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书