Understanding the preferences of younger women for the delivery of a service to predict breast cancer risk: a discrete choice experiment.

Stuart J Wright, Shabnam Thapa, Amber Salisbury, Sarah Hindmarch, David P French, Sacha J Howell, Katherine Payne
{"title":"Understanding the preferences of younger women for the delivery of a service to predict breast cancer risk: a discrete choice experiment.","authors":"Stuart J Wright, Shabnam Thapa, Amber Salisbury, Sarah Hindmarch, David P French, Sacha J Howell, Katherine Payne","doi":"10.1038/s44276-026-00209-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to understand the preferences of a sample of younger women (30-39 years) for the attributes of models of service delivery for a breast cancer risk-prediction service to identify how best to design a service to optimise uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A discrete choice experiment was used to quantify the preferences of a purposive sample of younger women (aged 30-39) without prior knowledge of their risk of developing breast cancer. Respondents chose from a series of questions including two unlabelled alternatives, representing different models of a risk-prediction service, and an opt-out alternative. Data were analysed using random parameter logit and latent class models to explore potential heterogeneity in preferences for the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The predicted uptake for a risk-prediction service ranged from 77 to 89%. Participants preferred a service with more flexible appointments which could be booked by the individual themselves. Latent class analysis suggested that around 7% of women would never have their risk predicted and for approximately 30% of women the choice would depend on the design of the service.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Younger women would be likely to choose to have their breast cancer risk predicted, although some groups were sensitive to the design of the prediction service.</p>","PeriodicalId":519964,"journal":{"name":"BJC reports","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12987935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJC reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44276-026-00209-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to understand the preferences of a sample of younger women (30-39 years) for the attributes of models of service delivery for a breast cancer risk-prediction service to identify how best to design a service to optimise uptake.

Methods: A discrete choice experiment was used to quantify the preferences of a purposive sample of younger women (aged 30-39) without prior knowledge of their risk of developing breast cancer. Respondents chose from a series of questions including two unlabelled alternatives, representing different models of a risk-prediction service, and an opt-out alternative. Data were analysed using random parameter logit and latent class models to explore potential heterogeneity in preferences for the intervention.

Results: The predicted uptake for a risk-prediction service ranged from 77 to 89%. Participants preferred a service with more flexible appointments which could be booked by the individual themselves. Latent class analysis suggested that around 7% of women would never have their risk predicted and for approximately 30% of women the choice would depend on the design of the service.

Conclusion: Younger women would be likely to choose to have their breast cancer risk predicted, although some groups were sensitive to the design of the prediction service.

了解年轻女性对提供乳腺癌风险预测服务的偏好:离散选择实验。
背景:本研究旨在了解年轻女性(30-39岁)样本对乳腺癌风险预测服务提供模式属性的偏好,以确定如何最好地设计服务以优化吸收。方法:采用离散选择实验来量化年轻女性(30-39岁)的偏好,这些女性事先不知道自己患乳腺癌的风险。受访者从一系列问题中进行选择,包括两个未标记的替代方案,代表风险预测服务的不同模型,以及一个选择退出替代方案。使用随机参数logit和潜在类别模型对数据进行分析,以探索干预偏好的潜在异质性。结果:对风险预测服务的预测吸收范围为77%至89%。与会者更喜欢有更灵活预约的服务,可以由个人自己预约。潜在类别分析表明,大约7%的女性永远无法预测她们的风险,而大约30%的女性的选择取决于服务的设计。结论:年轻女性可能会选择乳腺癌风险预测,尽管一些群体对预测服务的设计很敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书