Stuart J Wright, Shabnam Thapa, Amber Salisbury, Sarah Hindmarch, David P French, Sacha J Howell, Katherine Payne
{"title":"Understanding the preferences of younger women for the delivery of a service to predict breast cancer risk: a discrete choice experiment.","authors":"Stuart J Wright, Shabnam Thapa, Amber Salisbury, Sarah Hindmarch, David P French, Sacha J Howell, Katherine Payne","doi":"10.1038/s44276-026-00209-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to understand the preferences of a sample of younger women (30-39 years) for the attributes of models of service delivery for a breast cancer risk-prediction service to identify how best to design a service to optimise uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A discrete choice experiment was used to quantify the preferences of a purposive sample of younger women (aged 30-39) without prior knowledge of their risk of developing breast cancer. Respondents chose from a series of questions including two unlabelled alternatives, representing different models of a risk-prediction service, and an opt-out alternative. Data were analysed using random parameter logit and latent class models to explore potential heterogeneity in preferences for the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The predicted uptake for a risk-prediction service ranged from 77 to 89%. Participants preferred a service with more flexible appointments which could be booked by the individual themselves. Latent class analysis suggested that around 7% of women would never have their risk predicted and for approximately 30% of women the choice would depend on the design of the service.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Younger women would be likely to choose to have their breast cancer risk predicted, although some groups were sensitive to the design of the prediction service.</p>","PeriodicalId":519964,"journal":{"name":"BJC reports","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12987935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJC reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44276-026-00209-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to understand the preferences of a sample of younger women (30-39 years) for the attributes of models of service delivery for a breast cancer risk-prediction service to identify how best to design a service to optimise uptake.
Methods: A discrete choice experiment was used to quantify the preferences of a purposive sample of younger women (aged 30-39) without prior knowledge of their risk of developing breast cancer. Respondents chose from a series of questions including two unlabelled alternatives, representing different models of a risk-prediction service, and an opt-out alternative. Data were analysed using random parameter logit and latent class models to explore potential heterogeneity in preferences for the intervention.
Results: The predicted uptake for a risk-prediction service ranged from 77 to 89%. Participants preferred a service with more flexible appointments which could be booked by the individual themselves. Latent class analysis suggested that around 7% of women would never have their risk predicted and for approximately 30% of women the choice would depend on the design of the service.
Conclusion: Younger women would be likely to choose to have their breast cancer risk predicted, although some groups were sensitive to the design of the prediction service.