Validation of the Two-Factor Collaborative Structure of the Chinese Adult Self-Compassion Scale and Its Clinical Implications.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Xucheng Guo, Yibing Wang, Qiuhan Wan, Mingjie Zhou
{"title":"Validation of the Two-Factor Collaborative Structure of the Chinese Adult Self-Compassion Scale and Its Clinical Implications.","authors":"Xucheng Guo, Yibing Wang, Qiuhan Wan, Mingjie Zhou","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2026.2633781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To advance culturally sensitive measurement, this study examined the structural universality and specificity of the Chinese Adult Self-Compassion Scale (SCS-CA) in China. Data from Chinese adults (<i>N</i> = 1,638) completing the SCS-CA and Parental Burnout Assessment were analyzed using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM; testing eight competing models), bifactor indexes (assessing total score utility), exploratory graph analysis (EGA; mapping the network structure), and external validity tests. ESEM supported both six- and two-factor models, but the two-factor model (compassionate self-responding vs. uncompassionate self-responding) fit best. Bifactor indexes ruled out the use of a single total score. EGA confirmed a synergistic two-dimensional structure, identifying self-judgment as the central node and common humanity as the key bridge. The uncompassionate self-responding dimension also emerged as a significantly stronger predictor of parental burnout. The results establish a culturally specific, two-dimensional model of self-compassion for China, revealing distinct dynamics between its components and providing a foundation for tailored interventions and future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2026.2633781","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To advance culturally sensitive measurement, this study examined the structural universality and specificity of the Chinese Adult Self-Compassion Scale (SCS-CA) in China. Data from Chinese adults (N = 1,638) completing the SCS-CA and Parental Burnout Assessment were analyzed using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM; testing eight competing models), bifactor indexes (assessing total score utility), exploratory graph analysis (EGA; mapping the network structure), and external validity tests. ESEM supported both six- and two-factor models, but the two-factor model (compassionate self-responding vs. uncompassionate self-responding) fit best. Bifactor indexes ruled out the use of a single total score. EGA confirmed a synergistic two-dimensional structure, identifying self-judgment as the central node and common humanity as the key bridge. The uncompassionate self-responding dimension also emerged as a significantly stronger predictor of parental burnout. The results establish a culturally specific, two-dimensional model of self-compassion for China, revealing distinct dynamics between its components and providing a foundation for tailored interventions and future research.

中国成人自我同情量表双因素协同结构的验证及其临床意义。
本研究旨在探讨中国成人自我同情量表(SCS-CA)在中国的结构普遍性和特异性。本研究采用探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)、双因子指数(评估总分效用)、探索性图分析(EGA)和外部效度检验对1638名完成父母倦怠量表和父母倦怠量表的中国成年人的数据进行分析。ESEM同时支持六因素模型和两因素模型,但两因素模型(富有同情心的自我反应与无同情心的自我反应)最适合。双因素指数排除了单一总分的使用。EGA确认了一个协同的二维结构,以自我判断为中心节点,以共同人性为关键桥梁。无同情心的自我反应维度也成为父母倦怠的一个显著更强的预测因子。研究结果为中国建立了一个具有文化特异性的二维自我同情模型,揭示了其组成部分之间的独特动态,为量身定制的干预措施和未来的研究提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Assessment (JPA) primarily publishes articles dealing with the development, evaluation, refinement, and application of personality assessment methods. Desirable articles address empirical, theoretical, instructional, or professional aspects of using psychological tests, interview data, or the applied clinical assessment process. They also advance the measurement, description, or understanding of personality, psychopathology, and human behavior. JPA is broadly concerned with developing and using personality assessment methods in clinical, counseling, forensic, and health psychology settings; with the assessment process in applied clinical practice; with the assessment of people of all ages and cultures; and with both normal and abnormal personality functioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书