{"title":"The impact of Assisted Reproductive Technology on the neonatal prognosis of newborns < 29 weeks gestational age: a retrospective case-control study.","authors":"Andréa Villeneuve, Aude Ansel-Wallois, Géraldine Porcu Buisson, Daniel Cohen, Aurélie Amar Hoffet, Anne Céline Reyss, Yves Jasaitis, Farid Boubred, Blandine Courbiere","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2026.103158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the neonatal prognosis of preterm infants born before 29 weeks of gestation based on their mode of conception (Medically Assisted Reproduction vs spontaneous pregnancy).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective case-control study was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit of the Hôpital de la Conception in Marseille.</p><p><strong>Subjetcs: </strong>All preterm newborns under 29 weeks of gestation hospitalized between 2014 and 2020 were included. Newborns conceived through Medically Assisted Reproduction were compared to a control group of newborns from spontaneous pregnancies, matched at a ratio of 1 case to 3 controls.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Medically Assisted Reproduction MAIN OUTCOME MESURES: The primary outcome was a composite criterion including the number of deaths, bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks of gestation, severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grade 3 or higher), severe retinopathy of prematurity (grade 3), and/or necrotizing enterocolitis (grade 2 or higher). Secondary outcomes included Apgar score, cesarean section rate, and average age at discharge from neonatal intensive care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 616 hospitalized newborns, 18.8% were conceived through Medically Assisted Reproduction (n=112). A total of 448 patients were included, with 112 cases and 336 controls. Among the cases, 21 were conceived via intrauterine insemination, 14 through ovulation stimulation with clomiphene, 54 through In Vitro Fertilization, and 23 through IntraCytoplasmic Sperm Injection. Multiple pregnancies were more common in the Medically Assisted Reproduction group (61.6%) compared to spontaneous conception (30.6%). No significant difference was observed in the neonatal prognosis between newborns conceived via Medically Assisted Reproduction and those from spontaneous pregnancies (74.1% vs 77.1%, p=0.52). The cesarean section rate was significantly higher among mothers who underwent Medically Assisted Reproduction (83% vs 59.2%, p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that newborns under 29 weeks of gestation conceived through Medically Assisted Reproduction have a neonatal prognosis comparable to those from spontaneous pregnancies, although cesarean section rates are higher among mothers who used Medically Assisted Reproduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":" ","pages":"103158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2026.103158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the neonatal prognosis of preterm infants born before 29 weeks of gestation based on their mode of conception (Medically Assisted Reproduction vs spontaneous pregnancy).
Design: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit of the Hôpital de la Conception in Marseille.
Subjetcs: All preterm newborns under 29 weeks of gestation hospitalized between 2014 and 2020 were included. Newborns conceived through Medically Assisted Reproduction were compared to a control group of newborns from spontaneous pregnancies, matched at a ratio of 1 case to 3 controls.
Exposure: Medically Assisted Reproduction MAIN OUTCOME MESURES: The primary outcome was a composite criterion including the number of deaths, bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks of gestation, severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grade 3 or higher), severe retinopathy of prematurity (grade 3), and/or necrotizing enterocolitis (grade 2 or higher). Secondary outcomes included Apgar score, cesarean section rate, and average age at discharge from neonatal intensive care.
Results: Among the 616 hospitalized newborns, 18.8% were conceived through Medically Assisted Reproduction (n=112). A total of 448 patients were included, with 112 cases and 336 controls. Among the cases, 21 were conceived via intrauterine insemination, 14 through ovulation stimulation with clomiphene, 54 through In Vitro Fertilization, and 23 through IntraCytoplasmic Sperm Injection. Multiple pregnancies were more common in the Medically Assisted Reproduction group (61.6%) compared to spontaneous conception (30.6%). No significant difference was observed in the neonatal prognosis between newborns conceived via Medically Assisted Reproduction and those from spontaneous pregnancies (74.1% vs 77.1%, p=0.52). The cesarean section rate was significantly higher among mothers who underwent Medically Assisted Reproduction (83% vs 59.2%, p<0.05).
Conclusion: This study suggests that newborns under 29 weeks of gestation conceived through Medically Assisted Reproduction have a neonatal prognosis comparable to those from spontaneous pregnancies, although cesarean section rates are higher among mothers who used Medically Assisted Reproduction.
目的:探讨医学辅助生殖与自然妊娠对妊娠29周前早产儿新生儿预后的影响。设计:在马赛Hôpital de la Conception医院的新生儿重症监护室进行回顾性病例对照研究。研究对象:纳入2014年至2020年间住院的所有妊娠29周以下的早产新生儿。通过医学辅助生殖受孕的新生儿与自然受孕的新生儿对照组进行了比较,对照比例为1比3。主要结局指标:主要结局指标是一个复合标准,包括死亡人数、妊娠36周时支气管肺发育不良、严重脑室内出血(3级或以上)、严重早产儿视网膜病变(3级)和/或坏死性小肠结肠炎(2级或以上)。次要结局包括Apgar评分、剖宫产率和新生儿重症监护出院时的平均年龄。结果:616例住院新生儿中,通过医学辅助生殖受孕的占18.8%(112例)。共纳入448例患者,其中病例112例,对照组336例。其中宫内人工授精21例,克罗米芬促排卵14例,体外受精54例,胞浆内单精子注射23例。与自然受孕(30.6%)相比,多胎妊娠在医学辅助生殖组中更为常见(61.6%)。通过医学辅助生殖受孕的新生儿与自然受孕的新生儿预后无显著差异(74.1% vs 77.1%, p=0.52)。结论:本研究表明,通过医学辅助生殖受孕的29周以下新生儿的新生儿预后与自然妊娠的新生儿相当,尽管使用医学辅助生殖的母亲的剖宫产率更高。
期刊介绍:
Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF).
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines.
Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.