Anticipating incomplete patient-reported outcomes in schizophrenia: a machine learning approach to predict the occurrence of missing data.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Guillaume Barbalat, Julien Plasse, Isabelle Chéreau-Boudet, Benjamin Gouache, Emilie Legros-Lafarge, Nathalie Guillard-Bouhet, Nicolas Franck
{"title":"Anticipating incomplete patient-reported outcomes in schizophrenia: a machine learning approach to predict the occurrence of missing data.","authors":"Guillaume Barbalat, Julien Plasse, Isabelle Chéreau-Boudet, Benjamin Gouache, Emilie Legros-Lafarge, Nathalie Guillard-Bouhet, Nicolas Franck","doi":"10.1186/s12955-026-02511-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Missing data in patient-reported outcome (PRO) databases is a pervasive challenge, particularly in psychiatry and psychosocial rehabilitation. Incomplete data may reduce the generalizability of findings and introduce selection bias. It may also signal loss of access to care, potentially hindering recovery and rehabilitation efforts. Proactively anticipating missingness can help mitigate this issue by identifying individuals at risk of missing values, enabling services to take timely and targeted actions in response. However, the predictability of incomplete PRO data remains underexplored. METHODS: We used data from the French multicentric psychosocial rehabilitation database REHABase, focusing our analysis on patients with schizophrenia. We developed an ensemble machine learning model to predict missing data occurrence across six PROs, incorporating treatment center affiliation, sociodemographic features and clinical predictors. To ensure interpretability, we applied the concept of Shapley values to quantify individual predictor contributions to missing data patterns. RESULTS: Our sample comprised N = 2,363 participants. Averaged areas under the receiving operating curve (AUC) measured on the holdout testing observations ranged from 0.73 to 0.78 across the six PRO scales, demonstrating good predictive performance of our ensemble model. Treatment center affiliation emerged as a critical predictor of missing data. The ten most influential patient-level predictors were: being a disabled worker beneficiary; educational attainment; housing status; duration of illness; antipsychotic medication; origin of the referrer; number of suicide attempts; addictions comorbidity; having a forensic history; and sex. We also identified directional contributions distinguishing positive (increased likelihood of missing values) and negative effects (decreased likelihood). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this work represents the first predictive analytics framework for the occurrence of missing PRO data in psychosocial rehabilitation. Our ensemble algorithm holds dual potential: improving data collection strategies and informing targeted interventions to enhance patient engagement and retention. By proactively identifying at-risk individuals and refining study designs, our model could also indirectly support better functional recovery outcomes for schizophrenia patients. </p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13104463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-026-02511-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Missing data in patient-reported outcome (PRO) databases is a pervasive challenge, particularly in psychiatry and psychosocial rehabilitation. Incomplete data may reduce the generalizability of findings and introduce selection bias. It may also signal loss of access to care, potentially hindering recovery and rehabilitation efforts. Proactively anticipating missingness can help mitigate this issue by identifying individuals at risk of missing values, enabling services to take timely and targeted actions in response. However, the predictability of incomplete PRO data remains underexplored. METHODS: We used data from the French multicentric psychosocial rehabilitation database REHABase, focusing our analysis on patients with schizophrenia. We developed an ensemble machine learning model to predict missing data occurrence across six PROs, incorporating treatment center affiliation, sociodemographic features and clinical predictors. To ensure interpretability, we applied the concept of Shapley values to quantify individual predictor contributions to missing data patterns. RESULTS: Our sample comprised N = 2,363 participants. Averaged areas under the receiving operating curve (AUC) measured on the holdout testing observations ranged from 0.73 to 0.78 across the six PRO scales, demonstrating good predictive performance of our ensemble model. Treatment center affiliation emerged as a critical predictor of missing data. The ten most influential patient-level predictors were: being a disabled worker beneficiary; educational attainment; housing status; duration of illness; antipsychotic medication; origin of the referrer; number of suicide attempts; addictions comorbidity; having a forensic history; and sex. We also identified directional contributions distinguishing positive (increased likelihood of missing values) and negative effects (decreased likelihood). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this work represents the first predictive analytics framework for the occurrence of missing PRO data in psychosocial rehabilitation. Our ensemble algorithm holds dual potential: improving data collection strategies and informing targeted interventions to enhance patient engagement and retention. By proactively identifying at-risk individuals and refining study designs, our model could also indirectly support better functional recovery outcomes for schizophrenia patients.

预测精神分裂症患者报告的不完整结果:一种预测缺失数据发生的机器学习方法。
背景:患者报告结果(PRO)数据库中的数据缺失是一个普遍的挑战,特别是在精神病学和社会心理康复领域。不完整的数据可能会降低研究结果的普遍性,并引入选择偏差。它还可能表明无法获得护理,可能阻碍恢复和康复工作。通过识别存在价值缺失风险的个体,主动预测缺失可以帮助缓解这一问题,从而使服务部门能够及时采取有针对性的应对措施。然而,不完整PRO数据的可预测性仍未得到充分探索。方法:我们使用来自法国多中心心理社会康复数据库REHABase的数据,重点分析精神分裂症患者。我们开发了一个集成机器学习模型,结合治疗中心隶属关系、社会人口统计学特征和临床预测因素,预测六个PROs的数据缺失情况。为了确保可解释性,我们应用Shapley值的概念来量化单个预测因子对缺失数据模式的贡献。结果:我们的样本包括N = 2,363名参与者。在6个PRO量表上,holdout测试观测到的接收工作曲线下的平均面积(AUC)在0.73 ~ 0.78之间,表明我们的集成模型具有良好的预测性能。治疗中心隶属关系成为缺失数据的关键预测因子。10个最具影响力的患者水平预测因素是:残疾工人受益人;受教育程度;住房状况;患病时间;抗精神病药物;举报人的来源;自杀未遂人数;成瘾疾病;有法医鉴定史的;和性。我们还确定了区分积极(增加丢失值的可能性)和消极影响(降低可能性)的方向性贡献。结论:据我们所知,这项工作代表了社会心理康复中PRO数据缺失的第一个预测分析框架。我们的集成算法具有双重潜力:改进数据收集策略和告知有针对性的干预措施,以提高患者的参与度和保留率。通过主动识别高危个体和改进研究设计,我们的模型也可以间接支持精神分裂症患者更好的功能恢复结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书