Mastic gum as an adjunct therapy to standard bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A randomized single-blind pilot study.

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Vinay Tulsian, Ravi Kant, Itish Patnaik, Meenakshi Khapre, Kiran Meena, Balachandra Routhu
{"title":"Mastic gum as an adjunct therapy to standard bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A randomized single-blind pilot study.","authors":"Vinay Tulsian, Ravi Kant, Itish Patnaik, Meenakshi Khapre, Kiran Meena, Balachandra Routhu","doi":"10.1007/s12664-026-01968-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Helicobacter pylori infection is highly prevalent globally. Standard bismuth quadruple therapy is commonly used in India, but there are growing concerns regarding the emergence of anti-microbial resistance and treatment failure, necessitating the search for newer modalities. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of adding mastic gum to standard bismuth quadruple therapy (BQTs) for H. pylori eradication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-blind, randomized pilot trial, adults with Helicobacter pylori infection were assigned to receive two weeks' course of either standard bismuth quadruple therapy combined with mastic gum (Group A, n = 32) or bismuth quadruple therapy alone (Group B, n = 32). The primary endpoint was the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori assessed by urea breath test at six weeks after therapy. Secondary endpoints included symptom improvement, measured by Dyspepsia Symptom Severity Index (DSSI), adverse events and compliance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Urea breath test demonstrated higher eradication rates in Group A vs. Group B (85% vs. 67%, absolute risk reduction = 0.18, number needed to treat ≈ six). However, it failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.19). Both groups showed significant reductions in DSSI scores, with greater mean improvement in Group A (0.941 vs. 0.766, p = 0.001). Both treatment regimens were well-tolerated and treatment compliance was notably high in both groups, with 84.4% in each group reporting 100% compliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pilot study, the addition of mastic gum to standard bismuth quadruple therapy resulted in an observed increase in the proportion of eradicated cases; however, it did not meet the primary endpoint due to a lack of statistical significance. Nevertheless, the adjunct therapy was associated with significantly greater dyspepsia symptom relief and was well-tolerated without increasing adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":13404,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-026-01968-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Helicobacter pylori infection is highly prevalent globally. Standard bismuth quadruple therapy is commonly used in India, but there are growing concerns regarding the emergence of anti-microbial resistance and treatment failure, necessitating the search for newer modalities. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of adding mastic gum to standard bismuth quadruple therapy (BQTs) for H. pylori eradication.

Methods: In this single-blind, randomized pilot trial, adults with Helicobacter pylori infection were assigned to receive two weeks' course of either standard bismuth quadruple therapy combined with mastic gum (Group A, n = 32) or bismuth quadruple therapy alone (Group B, n = 32). The primary endpoint was the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori assessed by urea breath test at six weeks after therapy. Secondary endpoints included symptom improvement, measured by Dyspepsia Symptom Severity Index (DSSI), adverse events and compliance.

Results: Urea breath test demonstrated higher eradication rates in Group A vs. Group B (85% vs. 67%, absolute risk reduction = 0.18, number needed to treat ≈ six). However, it failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.19). Both groups showed significant reductions in DSSI scores, with greater mean improvement in Group A (0.941 vs. 0.766, p = 0.001). Both treatment regimens were well-tolerated and treatment compliance was notably high in both groups, with 84.4% in each group reporting 100% compliance.

Conclusions: In this pilot study, the addition of mastic gum to standard bismuth quadruple therapy resulted in an observed increase in the proportion of eradicated cases; however, it did not meet the primary endpoint due to a lack of statistical significance. Nevertheless, the adjunct therapy was associated with significantly greater dyspepsia symptom relief and was well-tolerated without increasing adverse effects.

乳香胶作为标准铋四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的辅助疗法:一项随机单盲先导研究。
背景和目的:幽门螺杆菌感染在全球范围内高度流行。标准的铋四联疗法在印度普遍使用,但人们越来越担心出现抗微生物药物耐药性和治疗失败,因此需要寻找新的治疗方式。本研究评估了在标准铋四联疗法(BQTs)中添加乳香胶根除幽门螺杆菌的有效性和安全性。方法:在这项单盲、随机的先导试验中,患有幽门螺杆菌感染的成年人被分配接受两周的疗程,要么接受标准四联治疗联合乳脂胶(A组,n = 32),要么接受单独四联治疗(B组,n = 32)。主要终点是治疗后6周通过尿素呼气试验评估幽门螺杆菌的根除率。次要终点包括以消化不良症状严重程度指数(DSSI)衡量的症状改善、不良事件和依从性。结果:尿素呼气试验显示A组比B组根除率更高(85%比67%,绝对风险降低= 0.18,需要治疗的人数≈6)。但没有达到统计学意义(p = 0.19)。两组的DSSI评分均显著降低,A组的平均改善幅度更大(0.941比0.766,p = 0.001)。两组治疗方案耐受性良好,治疗依从性都很高,每组84.4%的患者报告100%的依从性。结论:在这项初步研究中,在标准铋四联疗法中添加乳脂胶可观察到根除病例比例的增加;然而,由于缺乏统计学意义,它没有达到主要终点。然而,辅助治疗与明显更大的消化不良症状缓解相关,并且耐受性良好,没有增加不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Gastroenterology aims to help doctors everywhere practise better medicine and to influence the debate on gastroenterology. To achieve these aims, we publish original scientific studies, state-of -the-art special articles, reports and papers commenting on the clinical, scientific and public health factors affecting aspects of gastroenterology. We shall be delighted to receive articles for publication in all of these categories and letters commenting on the contents of the Journal or on issues of interest to our readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书