Africa's Critical Role in Shaping and Implementing the Pandemic Agreement's PABS Annex in an Era of Fragmentation.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nelson Aghogho Evaborhene
{"title":"Africa's Critical Role in Shaping and Implementing the Pandemic Agreement's PABS Annex in an Era of Fragmentation.","authors":"Nelson Aghogho Evaborhene","doi":"10.1186/s12992-026-01190-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The adoption of the World Health Organization Pandemic Agreement in May 2025 marked a political commitment to stronger global pandemic preparedness. Its credibility, however, depends on the successful negotiation and implementation of the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing annex under Article 12, to be finalized by April 2026. The COVID 19 pandemic exposed the failures of voluntary global health mechanisms, as African countries rapidly shared pathogen samples and sequence data yet faced severe delays in access to vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics. The PABS annex therefore represents the core test of whether the Agreement can move beyond symbolic equity toward enforceable obligations. This commentary argues that African countries enter the PABS negotiations with an unusual convergence of leverage: early scientific contributions, expanding regulatory and manufacturing capacity, and coordinated diplomacy through the African Union and Africa CDC. In a fragmented multilateral environment dominated by high income state interests, the central challenge is not recognition but conversion of capacity into binding rules. African negotiators have responded by pushing for standardized contracts, traceability of pathogen materials and sequence information, and compliance mechanisms that condition access on enforceable benefit sharing. Drawing on Africa’s institutional readiness, the paper contends that the continent is positioned not merely to influence the PABS annex, but to co-design its operational architecture. Whether this potential is realized will determine if the Pandemic Agreement corrects past inequities or reproduces them under a new legal form.</p>","PeriodicalId":12747,"journal":{"name":"Globalization and Health","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12989124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Globalization and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-026-01190-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adoption of the World Health Organization Pandemic Agreement in May 2025 marked a political commitment to stronger global pandemic preparedness. Its credibility, however, depends on the successful negotiation and implementation of the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing annex under Article 12, to be finalized by April 2026. The COVID 19 pandemic exposed the failures of voluntary global health mechanisms, as African countries rapidly shared pathogen samples and sequence data yet faced severe delays in access to vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics. The PABS annex therefore represents the core test of whether the Agreement can move beyond symbolic equity toward enforceable obligations. This commentary argues that African countries enter the PABS negotiations with an unusual convergence of leverage: early scientific contributions, expanding regulatory and manufacturing capacity, and coordinated diplomacy through the African Union and Africa CDC. In a fragmented multilateral environment dominated by high income state interests, the central challenge is not recognition but conversion of capacity into binding rules. African negotiators have responded by pushing for standardized contracts, traceability of pathogen materials and sequence information, and compliance mechanisms that condition access on enforceable benefit sharing. Drawing on Africa’s institutional readiness, the paper contends that the continent is positioned not merely to influence the PABS annex, but to co-design its operational architecture. Whether this potential is realized will determine if the Pandemic Agreement corrects past inequities or reproduces them under a new legal form.

在碎片化时代,非洲在制定和执行《大流行病协定》paabs附件方面的关键作用。
世界卫生组织于2025年5月通过《大流行病协定》,标志着加强全球大流行病防范的政治承诺。然而,其可信度取决于第12条下病原体获取和惠益分享附件的成功谈判和实施,该附件将于2026年4月前完成。2019冠状病毒病大流行暴露了自愿全球卫生机制的失败,非洲国家迅速共享病原体样本和序列数据,但在获得疫苗、诊断和治疗方面却面临严重延误。因此,PABS附件代表了协议是否能够超越象征性权益向可执行义务迈进的核心测试。这篇评论认为,非洲国家进入PABS谈判时具有不同寻常的优势:早期科学贡献、扩大监管和制造能力,以及通过非洲联盟和非洲疾病预防控制中心协调外交。在一个由高收入国家利益主导的支离破碎的多边环境中,核心挑战不是承认,而是将能力转化为有约束力的规则。非洲谈判代表的回应是推动标准化合同、病原体材料和序列信息的可追溯性,以及以可执行的利益分享为条件的合规机制。根据非洲的制度准备情况,该报告认为,非洲大陆不仅可以影响PABS附件,而且可以共同设计其业务架构。能否实现这一潜力将决定《大流行病协定》是纠正过去的不公平现象,还是以新的法律形式再现它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Globalization and Health
Globalization and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: "Globalization and Health" is a pioneering transdisciplinary journal dedicated to situating public health and well-being within the dynamic forces of global development. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, original research that explores the impact of globalization processes on global public health. This includes examining how globalization influences health systems and the social, economic, commercial, and political determinants of health. The journal welcomes contributions from various disciplines, including policy, health systems, political economy, international relations, and community perspectives. While single-country studies are accepted, they must emphasize global/globalization mechanisms and their relevance to global-level policy discourse and decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书