Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of the Calibrated Intraoral Scan Protocol: An In Vitro Comparison of Three Scan Calibrator Designs In an Edentulous Implant Model
Shengtao Yang, Chenyi Zhang, Yan Bao, Shuo Wang, Lei Chi, Li Yue, Quan Yuan, Junying Li
{"title":"Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of the Calibrated Intraoral Scan Protocol: An In Vitro Comparison of Three Scan Calibrator Designs In an Edentulous Implant Model","authors":"Shengtao Yang, Chenyi Zhang, Yan Bao, Shuo Wang, Lei Chi, Li Yue, Quan Yuan, Junying Li","doi":"10.1111/clr.70117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To introduce a universal scan calibrator (SC) and to evaluate its accuracy in the calibrated intraoral scan protocol (CISP) by comparison with two previously published SCs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Three SCs were evaluated on an edentulous implant model containing six scan bodies (SBs) positioned at the screw-retained abutment (SRA) level: (1) a universal SC with a C-shaped window (SC-CW), (2) an SC covering only the alveolar ridge (SC-R), and (3) an SC limited to the palatal region (SC-P). Each SC was attached to the model and scanned 10 times using an intraoral scanner (IOS). The intraoral scans were subsequently corrected using the corresponding desktop scans of the SCs as reference data. A desktop scan of the model served as the reference. The test scans were superimposed onto the reference scan by: (1) using all SBs to evaluate the overall fit, and (2) using the first and second SBs to simulate the virtual Sheffield test. Linear and angular deviations of SRAs were measured using Python scripts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>When aligned by all SBs, all three groups exhibited significant improvements in trueness and linear precision following correction. In the virtual Sheffield test, no statistically significant differences were observed in post-correction trueness or angular precision at the ending SRA6. All three groups achieved clinically acceptable trueness and precision values following correction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>All three SCs yielded clinically acceptable impressions after correction under in vitro conditions. The novel SC represents a promising approach for CISP; however, further in vivo clinical evidence is required.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"37 6","pages":"747-759"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/clr.70117","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.70117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To introduce a universal scan calibrator (SC) and to evaluate its accuracy in the calibrated intraoral scan protocol (CISP) by comparison with two previously published SCs.
Materials and Methods
Three SCs were evaluated on an edentulous implant model containing six scan bodies (SBs) positioned at the screw-retained abutment (SRA) level: (1) a universal SC with a C-shaped window (SC-CW), (2) an SC covering only the alveolar ridge (SC-R), and (3) an SC limited to the palatal region (SC-P). Each SC was attached to the model and scanned 10 times using an intraoral scanner (IOS). The intraoral scans were subsequently corrected using the corresponding desktop scans of the SCs as reference data. A desktop scan of the model served as the reference. The test scans were superimposed onto the reference scan by: (1) using all SBs to evaluate the overall fit, and (2) using the first and second SBs to simulate the virtual Sheffield test. Linear and angular deviations of SRAs were measured using Python scripts.
Results
When aligned by all SBs, all three groups exhibited significant improvements in trueness and linear precision following correction. In the virtual Sheffield test, no statistically significant differences were observed in post-correction trueness or angular precision at the ending SRA6. All three groups achieved clinically acceptable trueness and precision values following correction.
Conclusions
All three SCs yielded clinically acceptable impressions after correction under in vitro conditions. The novel SC represents a promising approach for CISP; however, further in vivo clinical evidence is required.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.