QUALITATIVE AND SEMIQUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF INTRALESIONAL UPTAKE MISMATCH BETWEEN FDG AND PSMA PET/CT IN NEOPLASTIC LESIONS

IF 1.6 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.htct.2026.106332
Adrhyann Jullyanne de Sousa Portilho, Maria Emilia Seren Takahashi, Simone Kuba, Natália Tobar Toledo Prudente da Silva, Murilo Oliveira Cerci, Carmino Antonio de Souza, Celso Dario Ramos
{"title":"QUALITATIVE AND SEMIQUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF INTRALESIONAL UPTAKE MISMATCH BETWEEN FDG AND PSMA PET/CT IN NEOPLASTIC LESIONS","authors":"Adrhyann Jullyanne de Sousa Portilho,&nbsp;Maria Emilia Seren Takahashi,&nbsp;Simone Kuba,&nbsp;Natália Tobar Toledo Prudente da Silva,&nbsp;Murilo Oliveira Cerci,&nbsp;Carmino Antonio de Souza,&nbsp;Celso Dario Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.htct.2026.106332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with [18F]FDG is widely used to assess tumor glycolytic metabolism, whereas [18F]PSMA-1007 or [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT is associated with tumor neovascularization. Notably, some lesions exhibit an intralesional “mismatch”, in which different regions within the same lesion demonstrate higher uptake of either [18F]FDG or PSMA-targeted radiotracers, suggesting distinct metabolic phenotypes and possible intratumoral heterogeneity. However, few studies have explored the combined use of these tracers. To evaluate the intralesional distribution of [18F]FDG and ([18F]PSMA-1007 or [68Ga]PSMA-11) in PET/CT images across malignancies using qualitative and semiquantitative parameters, aiming to investigate patterns of intralesional uptake mismatch. This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients with differentiated thyroid cancer, lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma undergoing staging or restaging. All patients underwent both [18F]FDG and [18F]PSMA-1007 or [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT within an interval. The largest soft-tissue lesion (or bone lesion with a soft-tissue component) with a maximum diameter = 4 cm was selected for analysis. PET/CT images were evaluated qualitatively and semiquantitatively. Qualitative assessment of intralesional tracer uptake differences was performed using a classification system. Intralesional PSMA distribution relative to FDG uptake was classified as peripheral (1), central (2), diffuse (3), or segmental (4). Semiquantitative parameters, including SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion metabolism (TLM; MTV × SUVmean), were measured with a PET/CT viewer plug-in for ImageJ (FIJI). MTV was defined using a fixed SUV threshold (= 2.5) for [18F]FDG and uptake above the mediastinal blood pool for PSMA tracers.Eleven patients were included: 3/11 (27%) thyroid cancer, 3/11 (27%) lung cancer, 2/11 (18%) hepatocellular carcinoma, 2/11 (18%) multiple myeloma, and 1/11 (9%) lymphoma (3 males, 8 females; mean age 63.4 ± 13.8 years). Visual analysis demonstrated predominantly peripheral PSMA uptake in 5/11 patients (46%), including all thyroid cancer cases. Segmental PSMA uptake was observed in 3/11 (27%), central uptake in 2/11 (18%), and diffuse uptake in 1/11 (9%). Median (range) SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, and TLM for PSMA and FDG were respectively: 21.5 (4.9–73) vs 14.8 (4.1–36.6) [p = 0.4389]; 6.22 (2.93–12.5) vs 7 (3–17.6); [p = 0.9314]; 81.7 (3.3–228.9) vs. 77.2 (14.9–313.5) [p = 0.6665]; and 519.5 (9.7–1345.3) vs 716.2 (46.8–4229.2) [p = 0.5457].Intralesional uptake mismatch between FDG and PSMA is highly prevalent across neoplastic lesions from different malignancies. However, semiquantitative parameters did not differ significantly at the population level, possibly due to the limited sample size or because this phenomenon is predominantly spatial and not fully captured by global metrics. The frequent peripheral PSMA uptake pattern may reflect neovascularization surrounding relatively hypoxic or necrotic tumor cores. Segmental and central uptake patterns may suggest the coexistence of distinct tumor cell clones within the same lesion, whereas diffuse uptake may reflect more homogeneous tumor biology. Further studies integrating PET imaging with spatially correlated, multi-site tumor biopsies are warranted to clarify the biological significance of intralesional FDG/PSMA mismatch patterns across different cancers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12958,"journal":{"name":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 106332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137926000799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with [18F]FDG is widely used to assess tumor glycolytic metabolism, whereas [18F]PSMA-1007 or [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT is associated with tumor neovascularization. Notably, some lesions exhibit an intralesional “mismatch”, in which different regions within the same lesion demonstrate higher uptake of either [18F]FDG or PSMA-targeted radiotracers, suggesting distinct metabolic phenotypes and possible intratumoral heterogeneity. However, few studies have explored the combined use of these tracers. To evaluate the intralesional distribution of [18F]FDG and ([18F]PSMA-1007 or [68Ga]PSMA-11) in PET/CT images across malignancies using qualitative and semiquantitative parameters, aiming to investigate patterns of intralesional uptake mismatch. This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients with differentiated thyroid cancer, lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma undergoing staging or restaging. All patients underwent both [18F]FDG and [18F]PSMA-1007 or [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT within an interval. The largest soft-tissue lesion (or bone lesion with a soft-tissue component) with a maximum diameter = 4 cm was selected for analysis. PET/CT images were evaluated qualitatively and semiquantitatively. Qualitative assessment of intralesional tracer uptake differences was performed using a classification system. Intralesional PSMA distribution relative to FDG uptake was classified as peripheral (1), central (2), diffuse (3), or segmental (4). Semiquantitative parameters, including SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion metabolism (TLM; MTV × SUVmean), were measured with a PET/CT viewer plug-in for ImageJ (FIJI). MTV was defined using a fixed SUV threshold (= 2.5) for [18F]FDG and uptake above the mediastinal blood pool for PSMA tracers.Eleven patients were included: 3/11 (27%) thyroid cancer, 3/11 (27%) lung cancer, 2/11 (18%) hepatocellular carcinoma, 2/11 (18%) multiple myeloma, and 1/11 (9%) lymphoma (3 males, 8 females; mean age 63.4 ± 13.8 years). Visual analysis demonstrated predominantly peripheral PSMA uptake in 5/11 patients (46%), including all thyroid cancer cases. Segmental PSMA uptake was observed in 3/11 (27%), central uptake in 2/11 (18%), and diffuse uptake in 1/11 (9%). Median (range) SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, and TLM for PSMA and FDG were respectively: 21.5 (4.9–73) vs 14.8 (4.1–36.6) [p = 0.4389]; 6.22 (2.93–12.5) vs 7 (3–17.6); [p = 0.9314]; 81.7 (3.3–228.9) vs. 77.2 (14.9–313.5) [p = 0.6665]; and 519.5 (9.7–1345.3) vs 716.2 (46.8–4229.2) [p = 0.5457].Intralesional uptake mismatch between FDG and PSMA is highly prevalent across neoplastic lesions from different malignancies. However, semiquantitative parameters did not differ significantly at the population level, possibly due to the limited sample size or because this phenomenon is predominantly spatial and not fully captured by global metrics. The frequent peripheral PSMA uptake pattern may reflect neovascularization surrounding relatively hypoxic or necrotic tumor cores. Segmental and central uptake patterns may suggest the coexistence of distinct tumor cell clones within the same lesion, whereas diffuse uptake may reflect more homogeneous tumor biology. Further studies integrating PET imaging with spatially correlated, multi-site tumor biopsies are warranted to clarify the biological significance of intralesional FDG/PSMA mismatch patterns across different cancers.
肿瘤病变中FDG与psma pet / ct摄取不匹配的定性和半定量评估
[18F]FDG的正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)被广泛用于评估肿瘤糖溶代谢,而[18F]PSMA-1007或[68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT与肿瘤新生血管形成有关。值得注意的是,一些病变表现出病变内的“错配”,即同一病变内的不同区域对[18F]FDG或psma靶向放射性示踪剂的摄取更高,这表明不同的代谢表型和可能的肿瘤内异质性。然而,很少有研究探索这些示踪剂的联合使用。利用定性和半定量参数评估恶性肿瘤PET/CT图像中[18F]FDG和([18F]PSMA-1007或[68Ga]PSMA-11)在病灶内的分布,旨在研究病灶内摄取错配的模式。这项回顾性横断面研究包括分期或再分期的分化甲状腺癌、肺癌、肝细胞癌、淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤患者。所有患者均在一段时间内接受了[18F]FDG和[18F]PSMA-1007或[68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT检查。选取最大直径 = 4 cm的软组织病变(或含软组织成分的骨病变)进行分析。PET/CT图像进行定性和半定量评价。采用分类系统对局部示踪剂摄取差异进行定性评估。与FDG摄取相关的病灶内PSMA分布分为外周(1)、中心(2)、弥漫性(3)和节段性(4)。使用ImageJ (FIJI)的PET/CT查看器插件测量半定量参数,包括SUVmax、SUVmean、代谢肿瘤体积(MTV)和总病变代谢(TLM; MTV × SUVmean)。MTV使用固定的SUV阈值(= 2.5)来定义[18F]FDG和PSMA示踪剂在纵隔血池上方的摄取。11例患者:3/11(27%)甲状腺癌,3/11(27%)肺癌,2/11(18%)肝细胞癌,2/11(18%)多发性骨髓瘤,1/11(9%)淋巴瘤(男3例,女8例,平均年龄63.4±13.8岁)。视觉分析显示5/11的患者(46%)主要摄取外周PSMA,包括所有甲状腺癌病例。3/11出现节段性PSMA摄取(27%),2/11出现中枢摄取(18%),1/11出现弥漫性摄取(9%)。PSMA和FDG的SUVmax、SUVmean、MTV和TLM的中位数(范围)分别为:21.5 (4.9-73)vs 14.8 (4.1-36.6) [p = 0.4389];6.22 (2.93-12.5) vs 7 (3-17.6);(p = 0.9314);81.7(3.3 - -228.9)和77.2 (14.9 - -313.5)(p = 0.6665);和519.5(9.7 - -1345.3)和716.2 (46.8 - -4229.2)[p = 0.5457]。在不同恶性肿瘤的肿瘤病变中,FDG和PSMA的病变内摄取不匹配是非常普遍的。然而,半定量参数在总体水平上没有显着差异,可能是由于样本量有限,或者因为这种现象主要是空间的,没有被全球指标完全捕获。频繁的外周PSMA摄取模式可能反映了相对缺氧或坏死肿瘤核心周围的新生血管。节段性和中枢性摄取模式可能表明在同一病变内存在不同的肿瘤细胞克隆共存,而弥漫性摄取可能反映了更均匀的肿瘤生物学。进一步的研究将PET成像与空间相关的多部位肿瘤活检相结合,以阐明不同癌症的病灶内FDG/PSMA错配模式的生物学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1419
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书