Autocratization through academic capture: When and how would-be autocrats threaten academic freedom

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Angelo Vito Panaro
{"title":"Autocratization through academic capture: When and how would-be autocrats threaten academic freedom","authors":"Angelo Vito Panaro","doi":"10.1016/j.ijer.2026.102984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past decade, academic freedom has faced unprecedented challenges worldwide. While existing scholarship often treats restrictions on academia as a collateral damage of autocratization, this article argues that the erosion of academic freedom constitutes a distinct mode of autocratization through academic capture. Drawing on global data from the Episodes of Regime Transformation (ERT) and the Academic Freedom Index (AFI), the article examines the relationship between autocratization episodes and changes in academic freedom between 1990 and 2024. The empirical analysis demonstrates significant declines across all dimensions of academic freedom following the onset of autocratization. In the majority of cases where autocratization episodes coincide with decline episodes of academic freedom, these processes culminate either in the consolidation of authoritarian rule or democratic breakdown. To complement the quantitative analysis, four illustrative case studies – India, Georgia, Venezuela, and Poland – trace the strategies through which governments undermine academic freedom as part of their broader autocratizing toolkit. The case studies reveal that academic capture is not confined to authoritarian regimes but can unfold in liberal and electoral democracies alike, often through a combination of different strategies. Overall, the article offers a novel conceptual lens for understanding the dynamics of autocratization, recognising academic capture not as a symptom of autocratization, but as a distinct pathway through which autocratization unfolds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Research","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 102984"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035526000558","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past decade, academic freedom has faced unprecedented challenges worldwide. While existing scholarship often treats restrictions on academia as a collateral damage of autocratization, this article argues that the erosion of academic freedom constitutes a distinct mode of autocratization through academic capture. Drawing on global data from the Episodes of Regime Transformation (ERT) and the Academic Freedom Index (AFI), the article examines the relationship between autocratization episodes and changes in academic freedom between 1990 and 2024. The empirical analysis demonstrates significant declines across all dimensions of academic freedom following the onset of autocratization. In the majority of cases where autocratization episodes coincide with decline episodes of academic freedom, these processes culminate either in the consolidation of authoritarian rule or democratic breakdown. To complement the quantitative analysis, four illustrative case studies – India, Georgia, Venezuela, and Poland – trace the strategies through which governments undermine academic freedom as part of their broader autocratizing toolkit. The case studies reveal that academic capture is not confined to authoritarian regimes but can unfold in liberal and electoral democracies alike, often through a combination of different strategies. Overall, the article offers a novel conceptual lens for understanding the dynamics of autocratization, recognising academic capture not as a symptom of autocratization, but as a distinct pathway through which autocratization unfolds.
通过学术俘获的独裁:何时以及如何威胁到学术自由
在过去的十年里,学术自由在世界范围内面临着前所未有的挑战。虽然现有的学术界经常将对学术的限制视为专制的附带损害,但本文认为,学术自由的侵蚀通过学术捕获构成了一种独特的专制模式。本文利用政权转型事件(ERT)和学术自由指数(AFI)的全球数据,研究了1990年至2024年间独裁事件与学术自由变化之间的关系。实证分析表明,在专制开始后,学术自由的各个维度都出现了显著下降。在大多数情况下,专制时期与学术自由的衰落时期同时发生,这些过程最终要么是威权统治的巩固,要么是民主的崩溃。为了补充定量分析,四个说明性案例研究——印度、格鲁吉亚、委内瑞拉和波兰——追踪了政府破坏学术自由的策略,作为其更广泛的独裁工具的一部分。案例研究表明,学术俘获并不局限于专制政权,也可以在自由民主和选举民主国家展开,通常是通过不同策略的结合。总体而言,本文提供了一个全新的概念视角来理解专制的动态,认识到学术捕获不是专制的症状,而是专制展开的独特途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Research
International Journal of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Educational Research publishes regular papers and special issues on specific topics of interest to international audiences of educational researchers. Examples of recent Special Issues published in the journal illustrate the breadth of topics that have be included in the journal: Students Perspectives on Learning Environments, Social, Motivational and Emotional Aspects of Learning Disabilities, Epistemological Beliefs and Domain, Analyzing Mathematics Classroom Cultures and Practices, and Music Education: A site for collaborative creativity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书