VALIDATION OF THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY (TLC) FOR RADIOCHEMICAL IMPURITY DETERMINATION OF 68GA-PSMA-11

IF 1.5 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.htct.2026.106340
Luiza Mascarenhas Balieiro, Laila Lima da Silva, Maria Renata Brandão Freire, Luana Pereira, Renata Ruggier de Mattos, Joel Mendes dos Santos, Margareth Mie Nakamura Matsuda, Elaine Bortoleti de Araujo
{"title":"VALIDATION OF THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY (TLC) FOR RADIOCHEMICAL IMPURITY DETERMINATION OF 68GA-PSMA-11","authors":"Luiza Mascarenhas Balieiro,&nbsp;Laila Lima da Silva,&nbsp;Maria Renata Brandão Freire,&nbsp;Luana Pereira,&nbsp;Renata Ruggier de Mattos,&nbsp;Joel Mendes dos Santos,&nbsp;Margareth Mie Nakamura Matsuda,&nbsp;Elaine Bortoleti de Araujo","doi":"10.1016/j.htct.2026.106340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>European Pharmacopoeia (EP) published in 2024 the monograph “Gallium (68Ga) PSMA-11 injection”, one of the most used PET-radiopharmaceutical for prostate cancer diagnosis, establishing the limit and procedure for radiochemical impurity determination by TLC. When the method for release the product is pharmacompendial, it is not required to validate the analytical method; instead, it must be performed the verification of the method to demonstrate the performance under the laboratory conditions. This work aimed to validate the TLC method used to quantify % free Ga-68 after labeling BLINDING PSMA-11 cold kit formulation, performing repeatability, intermediate precision, selectivity, linearity, and robustness tests. TLC was performed as described in EP. Radioactive samples of 37 MBq/mL were applied to iTLC strips (1.5 × 12.5 cm) at 1.5 cm from the base. Automatic gamma counter (Cobra II, Packard) was used to measure the radioactivity of the strips at 300–1200 keV energy window. For assessment the repeatability, 6 samples were prepared by the same analyst. For intermediate precision, samples were tested by another analyst; both assays evaluated the relative standard deviation (RSD) of % free Ga-68. The selectivity evaluate the retention factor (Rf) and the profile of the chromatographic separation of 6 samples containing or not the following solutions 0.1 mL of 68Ga-PSMA-11, 68GaCl3 or excipient (0.02 mL of 100 mg/mL mannitol) in final volume of 1 mL. The analytical curve was obtained with radioactive concentrations solutions of 1.11, 3.7, 18.5, 29.6, 37, and 44.4 MBq/mL. The counting of the strips considered Ga-68 decay using the time of beginning of the test. Counting of the strips related to free Ga-68 should be proportional to concentration, the slope must be significantly different from zero, and the correlation coefficient must be above 0.990. Linearity analysis was performed using statistical methods. Robustness evaluated the influence of sample radioactive concentration (44 MBq/mL and 18.5 MBq/mL), sample volume (5 µL and 2 µL), and stationary phase (iTLC and TLC). The acceptance criteria established for this assay was Ga-68 &lt; 3%, Rf Ga-68 of 0.2 and RSD = 25.0%. All assays were performed in triplicate. The RSD of repeatability and intermediate precision assays were 9.36 and 12.4%, respectively. According to TLC profile, the Rf of 68Ga-PSMA-11 was 0.8–1.0 and the selectivity test showed that there is no variation in the Rf of the product and free Ga-68 even in the presence of mannitol (component of the cold kit formulation). In linearity, Cochran test showed homoscedasticity of the results, demonstrating that the use of ordinary least squares (OLS) is adequate, F-test confirmed the linear correlation between radioactive concentration and counting, and the variance of the analytical curve. Shapiro-Wilk test demonstrated normal distribution of the residuals, and consequently, Grubbs test indicated that there are no outliers. Slope and correlation coefficient were 24438 and 0.997, respectively. Robustness assays yielded values up to RSD 14.22%, obtained with 0.5 mCi/mL, 2.0 µL sample volume, and iTLC strips. The TLC method described in EP 11th Edition to determine % free Ga-68 after the labeling PSMA-11 cold kit was evaluated in accordance to ANVISA Normatives (RDC 166/2017 and Guide 10 for statistical analyses, 2017), demonstrating selectivity, repeatability, intermediate precision, linearity, and robustness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12958,"journal":{"name":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 106340"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137926000878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

European Pharmacopoeia (EP) published in 2024 the monograph “Gallium (68Ga) PSMA-11 injection”, one of the most used PET-radiopharmaceutical for prostate cancer diagnosis, establishing the limit and procedure for radiochemical impurity determination by TLC. When the method for release the product is pharmacompendial, it is not required to validate the analytical method; instead, it must be performed the verification of the method to demonstrate the performance under the laboratory conditions. This work aimed to validate the TLC method used to quantify % free Ga-68 after labeling BLINDING PSMA-11 cold kit formulation, performing repeatability, intermediate precision, selectivity, linearity, and robustness tests. TLC was performed as described in EP. Radioactive samples of 37 MBq/mL were applied to iTLC strips (1.5 × 12.5 cm) at 1.5 cm from the base. Automatic gamma counter (Cobra II, Packard) was used to measure the radioactivity of the strips at 300–1200 keV energy window. For assessment the repeatability, 6 samples were prepared by the same analyst. For intermediate precision, samples were tested by another analyst; both assays evaluated the relative standard deviation (RSD) of % free Ga-68. The selectivity evaluate the retention factor (Rf) and the profile of the chromatographic separation of 6 samples containing or not the following solutions 0.1 mL of 68Ga-PSMA-11, 68GaCl3 or excipient (0.02 mL of 100 mg/mL mannitol) in final volume of 1 mL. The analytical curve was obtained with radioactive concentrations solutions of 1.11, 3.7, 18.5, 29.6, 37, and 44.4 MBq/mL. The counting of the strips considered Ga-68 decay using the time of beginning of the test. Counting of the strips related to free Ga-68 should be proportional to concentration, the slope must be significantly different from zero, and the correlation coefficient must be above 0.990. Linearity analysis was performed using statistical methods. Robustness evaluated the influence of sample radioactive concentration (44 MBq/mL and 18.5 MBq/mL), sample volume (5 µL and 2 µL), and stationary phase (iTLC and TLC). The acceptance criteria established for this assay was Ga-68 < 3%, Rf Ga-68 of 0.2 and RSD = 25.0%. All assays were performed in triplicate. The RSD of repeatability and intermediate precision assays were 9.36 and 12.4%, respectively. According to TLC profile, the Rf of 68Ga-PSMA-11 was 0.8–1.0 and the selectivity test showed that there is no variation in the Rf of the product and free Ga-68 even in the presence of mannitol (component of the cold kit formulation). In linearity, Cochran test showed homoscedasticity of the results, demonstrating that the use of ordinary least squares (OLS) is adequate, F-test confirmed the linear correlation between radioactive concentration and counting, and the variance of the analytical curve. Shapiro-Wilk test demonstrated normal distribution of the residuals, and consequently, Grubbs test indicated that there are no outliers. Slope and correlation coefficient were 24438 and 0.997, respectively. Robustness assays yielded values up to RSD 14.22%, obtained with 0.5 mCi/mL, 2.0 µL sample volume, and iTLC strips. The TLC method described in EP 11th Edition to determine % free Ga-68 after the labeling PSMA-11 cold kit was evaluated in accordance to ANVISA Normatives (RDC 166/2017 and Guide 10 for statistical analyses, 2017), demonstrating selectivity, repeatability, intermediate precision, linearity, and robustness.
薄层色谱法测定放射性化学杂质68ga-psma-11的验证
欧洲药典(EP)于2024年出版了专著《镓(68Ga) PSMA-11注射液》,确立了薄层色谱法测定放射化学杂质的限度和程序。镓(68Ga) PSMA-11注射液是诊断前列腺癌最常用的pet放射性药物之一。当产品放行方法为药典时,不需要对分析方法进行验证;相反,必须对该方法进行验证,以证明其在实验室条件下的性能。本工作旨在验证用于定量%游离Ga-68的TLC方法,在标记BLINDING PSMA-11冷试剂盒配方后,进行重复性、中间精密度、选择性、线性和鲁棒性测试。薄层色谱按照EP的描述进行。37 MBq/mL放射性样品在距底座1.5 cm处(1.5 × 12.5 cm)涂于iTLC条上。采用自动伽马计数器(Cobra II, Packard)在300 - 1200kev能量窗下测量条带的放射性。为了评估重复性,由同一分析师制备了6个样品。对于中等精度,样品由另一位分析人员测试;两种方法均评估游离Ga-68的相对标准偏差(RSD)。在终体积为1ml的样品中分别加入0.1 mL的68Ga-PSMA-11、68GaCl3或赋形剂(0.02 mL的100mg /mL甘露醇),对6种样品的保留因子(Rf)和色谱分离谱进行选择性评价。在放射性浓度分别为1.11、3.7、18.5、29.6、37、44.4 MBq/mL的样品中获得分析曲线。计数条考虑Ga-68衰变使用测试开始的时间。游离Ga-68相关条带计数应与浓度成正比,斜率必须显著不同于零,相关系数必须大于0.990。采用统计学方法进行线性分析。鲁棒性评估了样品放射性浓度(44 MBq/mL和18.5 MBq/mL)、样品体积(5µL和2µL)和固定相(iTLC和TLC)的影响。本试验建立的接受标准为Ga-68 3%, Rf Ga-68为0.2,RSD = 25.0%。所有试验均为三份。重复性和中间精密度的RSD分别为9.36和12.4%。根据TLC谱图可知,68Ga-PSMA-11的Rf值为0.8 ~ 1.0,选择性测试表明,即使在甘露醇(冷试剂盒配方成分)存在的情况下,产品和游离Ga-68的Rf值也没有变化。在线性方面,Cochran检验显示结果均方差,说明使用普通最小二乘法(OLS)是适当的;f检验证实了放射性浓度与计数和分析曲线方差之间的线性相关。Shapiro-Wilk检验表明残差呈正态分布,Grubbs检验表明残差不存在异常值。斜率为24438,相关系数为0.997。在0.5 mCi/mL、2.0µL样品体积和iTLC试纸条条件下,稳健性测定的RSD值高达14.22%。在标记PSMA-11冷试剂盒后,根据ANVISA规范(RDC 166/2017和统计分析指南10,2017)评估了EP第11版中描述的TLC方法,以确定游离Ga-68的百分比,证明了选择性,可重复性,中间精度,线性和鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1419
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书