Levelized cost pass-through of green hydrogen in the bioethanol fuel value chain in U.S. Midwest

IF 7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Karey Maynor , Mariam Arzumanyan , Ning Lin , Vaibhav Bahadur
{"title":"Levelized cost pass-through of green hydrogen in the bioethanol fuel value chain in U.S. Midwest","authors":"Karey Maynor ,&nbsp;Mariam Arzumanyan ,&nbsp;Ning Lin ,&nbsp;Vaibhav Bahadur","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2026.104911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study provides an integrated levelized cost pass-through analysis of the green hydrogen–green ammonia–corn–ethanol value chain, combining techno-economic modeling, environmental impact assessment, and federal tax credit incentives (Inflation Reduction Act, 45V and 45Q) into a unified analytical framework within the U.S. Midwest corn and ethanol supply chain. We determine that the levelized cost of green hydrogen ranges from $2.79/kg to $5.39/kg — depending on the availability of a $3/kg 45V tax credit — compared to $1.49–$2.18/kg for conventional hydrogen produced via steam methane reforming. These differences propagate downstream, resulting in green ammonia costs of $0.65/kg with the tax credit and $1.16/kg without, relative to a conventional cost range of $0.39–$0.59/kg. Consequently, corn production costs increase by $0.11 to $0.35 per bushel, which in turn raises the ethanol break-even price by $0.04–$0.12 per gallon. Despite these cost increases, green ammonia offers substantial environmental benefits, achieving up to a 96% reduction in lifecycle <figure><img></figure> emissions compared to conventional ammonia and lowering emissions from corn production and ethanol generation by 33% and 9.1%, respectively. Our in-depth analysis illuminates the complex trade-offs between higher input costs and environmental benefits, providing a robust assessment of the long-term viability of green fertilizer inputs in the agricultural and biofuel sectors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 104911"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138826000974","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study provides an integrated levelized cost pass-through analysis of the green hydrogen–green ammonia–corn–ethanol value chain, combining techno-economic modeling, environmental impact assessment, and federal tax credit incentives (Inflation Reduction Act, 45V and 45Q) into a unified analytical framework within the U.S. Midwest corn and ethanol supply chain. We determine that the levelized cost of green hydrogen ranges from $2.79/kg to $5.39/kg — depending on the availability of a $3/kg 45V tax credit — compared to $1.49–$2.18/kg for conventional hydrogen produced via steam methane reforming. These differences propagate downstream, resulting in green ammonia costs of $0.65/kg with the tax credit and $1.16/kg without, relative to a conventional cost range of $0.39–$0.59/kg. Consequently, corn production costs increase by $0.11 to $0.35 per bushel, which in turn raises the ethanol break-even price by $0.04–$0.12 per gallon. Despite these cost increases, green ammonia offers substantial environmental benefits, achieving up to a 96% reduction in lifecycle
emissions compared to conventional ammonia and lowering emissions from corn production and ethanol generation by 33% and 9.1%, respectively. Our in-depth analysis illuminates the complex trade-offs between higher input costs and environmental benefits, providing a robust assessment of the long-term viability of green fertilizer inputs in the agricultural and biofuel sectors.
绿色氢在美国中西部生物乙醇燃料价值链中的成本传递
本研究提供了绿色氢-绿色氨-玉米-乙醇价值链的综合成本传递分析,将技术经济模型、环境影响评估和联邦税收抵免激励(通货膨胀减少法案,45V和45Q)结合到美国中西部玉米和乙醇供应链的统一分析框架中。我们确定绿色氢的平准化成本在2.79美元/千克到5.39美元/千克之间,这取决于是否有3美元/千克的45V税收抵免,而通过蒸汽甲烷重整生产的传统氢的成本为1.49美元- 2.18美元/千克。这些差异向下游传播,导致有税收抵免的绿色氨成本为0.65美元/千克,没有税收抵免的绿色氨成本为1.16美元/千克,而传统成本范围为0.39美元至0.59美元/千克。因此,玉米生产成本每蒲式耳增加0.11美元至0.35美元,这反过来又使乙醇的盈亏平衡价格每加仑提高0.04美元至0.12美元。尽管成本增加,但绿色氨提供了可观的环境效益,与传统氨相比,其生命周期排放量减少了96%,玉米生产和乙醇生产的排放量分别减少了33%和9.1%。我们的深入分析阐明了高投入成本和环境效益之间的复杂权衡,为农业和生物燃料部门绿色肥料投入的长期可行性提供了强有力的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1091
期刊介绍: Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书