Impacts of AI-enhanced task-based learning on EFL postgraduates’ higher order thinking skills and English academic writing self-efficacy

IF 3.7 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Journal of English for Academic Purposes Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2026.101652
Lijie Hao , Shahazwan Mat Yusoff , Kun Tian
{"title":"Impacts of AI-enhanced task-based learning on EFL postgraduates’ higher order thinking skills and English academic writing self-efficacy","authors":"Lijie Hao ,&nbsp;Shahazwan Mat Yusoff ,&nbsp;Kun Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2026.101652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how AI-enhanced task-based learning (AI-TBL) affects postgraduate EFL students' higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) and academic writing self-efficacy (SEF) compared with traditional task-based learning (TBL). Guided by constructivist learning theory, a 14-week quasi-experimental design was implemented with 168 postgraduate participants from various disciplines, all enrolled in an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) course at a Chinese university. The experimental group engaged in AI-enhanced instruction via the Yuketang platform, integrating AI-adaptive prompting, AI-generative feedback and AI-supported collaboration, while the control group followed conventional TBL without AI. Data were analyzed using MANCOVA, ANCOVA, and Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA). Findings revealed that AI-TBL significantly improved students’ critical thinking and problem-solving abilities, though its impact on creativity was limited. In academic writing self-efficacy, notable gains emerged in linguistic knowledge, information organization, writing performance, and self-regulation, whereas rehearsal and memory efficacy remained unchanged. The Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) results reveal that AI-TBL fostered denser interconnections between HOTS and SEF, forming a cohesive structure linking critical thinking, problem-solving, linguistic confidence, and metacognitive control. However, the impact on creativity and rehearsal-memory efficacy was minimal. The study contributes to understanding how AI scaffolding facilitates the relationship between HOTS and SEF in task-based pedagogy, supporting deeper engagement and metacognitive control. Implications for AI-enhanced EAP instruction emphasize the balance between technological adaptivity and human-guided creativity and reflection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 101652"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147515852600024X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how AI-enhanced task-based learning (AI-TBL) affects postgraduate EFL students' higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) and academic writing self-efficacy (SEF) compared with traditional task-based learning (TBL). Guided by constructivist learning theory, a 14-week quasi-experimental design was implemented with 168 postgraduate participants from various disciplines, all enrolled in an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) course at a Chinese university. The experimental group engaged in AI-enhanced instruction via the Yuketang platform, integrating AI-adaptive prompting, AI-generative feedback and AI-supported collaboration, while the control group followed conventional TBL without AI. Data were analyzed using MANCOVA, ANCOVA, and Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA). Findings revealed that AI-TBL significantly improved students’ critical thinking and problem-solving abilities, though its impact on creativity was limited. In academic writing self-efficacy, notable gains emerged in linguistic knowledge, information organization, writing performance, and self-regulation, whereas rehearsal and memory efficacy remained unchanged. The Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) results reveal that AI-TBL fostered denser interconnections between HOTS and SEF, forming a cohesive structure linking critical thinking, problem-solving, linguistic confidence, and metacognitive control. However, the impact on creativity and rehearsal-memory efficacy was minimal. The study contributes to understanding how AI scaffolding facilitates the relationship between HOTS and SEF in task-based pedagogy, supporting deeper engagement and metacognitive control. Implications for AI-enhanced EAP instruction emphasize the balance between technological adaptivity and human-guided creativity and reflection.
人工智能增强任务型学习对英语研究生高阶思维技能和英语学术写作自我效能感的影响
本研究探讨了人工智能增强的任务型学习(AI-TBL)与传统的任务型学习(TBL)相比如何影响研究生英语学生的高阶思维技能(HOTS)和学术写作自我效能感(SEF)。本研究以建构主义学习理论为指导,对168名研究生进行了为期14周的准实验设计,这些研究生均来自不同学科,均参加了一所中国大学的学术英语课程。实验组通过育可堂平台进行人工智能增强教学,整合人工智能自适应提示、人工智能生成反馈和人工智能支持协作,对照组采用常规TBL,不使用人工智能。使用MANCOVA、ANCOVA和认知网络分析(ENA)对数据进行分析。研究结果显示,AI-TBL显著提高了学生的批判性思维和解决问题的能力,但对创造力的影响有限。学术写作自我效能在语言知识、信息组织、写作表现和自我调节方面有显著提高,而排练和记忆效能没有变化。认知网络分析(ENA)结果显示,AI-TBL在HOTS和SEF之间培养了更紧密的联系,形成了一个连接批判性思维、解决问题、语言自信和元认知控制的内聚结构。然而,对创造力和排练记忆效率的影响很小。该研究有助于理解人工智能脚手架如何促进任务型教学法中HOTS和SEF之间的关系,从而支持更深层次的参与和元认知控制。对人工智能增强的EAP教学的影响强调了技术适应性与人类引导的创造力和反思之间的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of English for Academic Purposes provides a forum for the dissemination of information and views which enables practitioners of and researchers in EAP to keep current with developments in their field and to contribute to its continued updating. JEAP publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges in the linguistic, sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic description of English as it occurs in the contexts of academic study and scholarly exchange itself.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书