Exploring willingness to communicate vis-à-vis learner talk in an EAP classroom: An observation-assisted repeated Q methodology study

IF 3.4 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Journal of English for Academic Purposes Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2026.101642
Qianqian Zhou, Qingyang Sun, Yuqing Wang , Yangxu Shen
{"title":"Exploring willingness to communicate vis-à-vis learner talk in an EAP classroom: An observation-assisted repeated Q methodology study","authors":"Qianqian Zhou,&nbsp;Qingyang Sun,&nbsp;Yuqing Wang ,&nbsp;Yangxu Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2026.101642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extensive scholarship has investigated willingness to communicate (WTC) concerning its intensity, antecedents, and correlations with other learner variables. Yet, empirical research into the dynamic interplay of factors through which WTC translates into talk, and the relative salience of such factors in the interactions, remains underexplored. To address this gap, the present study examines how English for Academic Purposes (EAP) students translate WTC into classroom talk within a pre-sessional English course, targeting the combined effects and relative strength of factors underlying their WTC–talk interface. Methodological triangulation integrated two rounds of Q methodology (n = 38), semi-structured interviews conducted at two timepoints, and one round of classroom observations. This repeated mixed-methods design revealed two profiles which remain largely consistent across both timepoints: 1) Internally driven and externally aided communicators (Profile 1, n = 23), and 2) Internally restrained and externally reliant communicators (Profile 2, n = 8). Two learner groups consistently identified with these two distinct profiles, and a third group (n = 7) transitioned between them. The findings empirically substantiate that factors are neither indiscriminately activated nor equally impactful across different communicative moments and scenarios. By illuminating salient factors and their interactional patterns underlying students’ WTC–talk processes, the study highlights between-group stability, within-learner stability and variability, thereby yielding context- and agent-contingent, pedagogically actionable implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 101642"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158526000147","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive scholarship has investigated willingness to communicate (WTC) concerning its intensity, antecedents, and correlations with other learner variables. Yet, empirical research into the dynamic interplay of factors through which WTC translates into talk, and the relative salience of such factors in the interactions, remains underexplored. To address this gap, the present study examines how English for Academic Purposes (EAP) students translate WTC into classroom talk within a pre-sessional English course, targeting the combined effects and relative strength of factors underlying their WTC–talk interface. Methodological triangulation integrated two rounds of Q methodology (n = 38), semi-structured interviews conducted at two timepoints, and one round of classroom observations. This repeated mixed-methods design revealed two profiles which remain largely consistent across both timepoints: 1) Internally driven and externally aided communicators (Profile 1, n = 23), and 2) Internally restrained and externally reliant communicators (Profile 2, n = 8). Two learner groups consistently identified with these two distinct profiles, and a third group (n = 7) transitioned between them. The findings empirically substantiate that factors are neither indiscriminately activated nor equally impactful across different communicative moments and scenarios. By illuminating salient factors and their interactional patterns underlying students’ WTC–talk processes, the study highlights between-group stability, within-learner stability and variability, thereby yielding context- and agent-contingent, pedagogically actionable implications.
探索沟通意愿与-à-vis学习者在EAP课堂上的谈话:一项观察辅助的重复Q方法研究
广泛的学术研究调查了沟通意愿(WTC)的强度、前因以及与其他学习者变量的相关性。然而,关于WTC转化为谈话的因素之间动态相互作用的实证研究,以及这些因素在相互作用中的相对显著性,仍未得到充分探索。为了解决这一差距,本研究调查了学术英语(EAP)学生如何在课前英语课程中将WTC转化为课堂会话,目标是WTC - talk界面背后因素的综合效应和相对强度。方法学三角测量结合了两轮Q方法(n = 38)、在两个时间点进行的半结构化访谈和一轮课堂观察。这种重复的混合方法设计揭示了两个在两个时间点上基本保持一致的特征:1)内部驱动和外部辅助的通信器(特征1,n = 23),以及2)内部约束和外部依赖的通信器(特征2,n = 8)。两组学习者一致认同这两种不同的特征,第三组(n = 7)在两者之间过渡。研究结果从经验上证实,在不同的交流时刻和场景中,因素既不是不分青红皂白地激活,也不是同等地影响。通过阐明学生WTC-talk过程的突出因素及其相互作用模式,本研究强调了群体之间的稳定性、学习者内部的稳定性和可变性,从而产生了情境和主体偶然的、教学上可操作的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of English for Academic Purposes provides a forum for the dissemination of information and views which enables practitioners of and researchers in EAP to keep current with developments in their field and to contribute to its continued updating. JEAP publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges in the linguistic, sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic description of English as it occurs in the contexts of academic study and scholarly exchange itself.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书