Landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning with a novel SHAP-based sampling strategy

IF 12.7 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Geoscience frontiers Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102188
Lei-Lei Liu , Can Duan , Jun-Hua Gao , Hao Xiao , Wen-Qing Zhu , Can Yang
{"title":"Landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning with a novel SHAP-based sampling strategy","authors":"Lei-Lei Liu ,&nbsp;Can Duan ,&nbsp;Jun-Hua Gao ,&nbsp;Hao Xiao ,&nbsp;Wen-Qing Zhu ,&nbsp;Can Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The landslide and non-landslide samples are important inputs for machine learning-based landslide susceptibility assessment. Compared to landslide samples, non-landslide samples generally present higher uncertainty due to random sampling. However, most sampling strategies (e.g., the feature space-based) for non-landslides only consider the characteristics of a single factor or the overall characteristics of all factors, which subsequently leads to either excessive artificial concentration of non-landslide samples or sampling information redundancy. To address these issues, a SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) based sampling strategy considering combined characteristics of landslide conditioning factors (LCFs) is proposed. This strategy sorts the importance of LCFs based on SHAP algorithm and generates multiple sampling spaces using different numbers of LCFs in the sense of importance order. The optimal sampling space is selected according to the Bayesian optimization algorithm. Then, random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models are utilized to assess the susceptibility of Chaling County, Yanling County, and Guidong County, China, based on the proposed strategy and traditional random sampling. The results indicate that, compared with the traditional RF and XGBoost models, the improved models show better performance with an 8.2% and 9.0% increase in the AUC, respectively. Furthermore, the SHAP-based sampling framework demonstrates good adaptability across the study areas with different geological and geomorphic conditions, suggesting its potential transferability to other regions, although local optimization of parameter settings may still be required.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12711,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience frontiers","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102188"},"PeriodicalIF":12.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987125001938","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The landslide and non-landslide samples are important inputs for machine learning-based landslide susceptibility assessment. Compared to landslide samples, non-landslide samples generally present higher uncertainty due to random sampling. However, most sampling strategies (e.g., the feature space-based) for non-landslides only consider the characteristics of a single factor or the overall characteristics of all factors, which subsequently leads to either excessive artificial concentration of non-landslide samples or sampling information redundancy. To address these issues, a SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) based sampling strategy considering combined characteristics of landslide conditioning factors (LCFs) is proposed. This strategy sorts the importance of LCFs based on SHAP algorithm and generates multiple sampling spaces using different numbers of LCFs in the sense of importance order. The optimal sampling space is selected according to the Bayesian optimization algorithm. Then, random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models are utilized to assess the susceptibility of Chaling County, Yanling County, and Guidong County, China, based on the proposed strategy and traditional random sampling. The results indicate that, compared with the traditional RF and XGBoost models, the improved models show better performance with an 8.2% and 9.0% increase in the AUC, respectively. Furthermore, the SHAP-based sampling framework demonstrates good adaptability across the study areas with different geological and geomorphic conditions, suggesting its potential transferability to other regions, although local optimization of parameter settings may still be required.

Abstract Image

基于shap采样策略的机器学习滑坡易感性评估
滑坡和非滑坡样本是基于机器学习的滑坡易感性评估的重要输入。与滑坡样本相比,非滑坡样本通常由于随机抽样而具有更高的不确定性。然而,大多数非滑坡采样策略(如基于特征空间的采样策略)只考虑单个因素的特征或所有因素的总体特征,从而导致非滑坡样本的人工过度集中或采样信息冗余。为了解决这些问题,提出了一种基于SHapley加性解释(SHAP)的采样策略,该策略考虑了滑坡调节因子(LCFs)的组合特征。该策略基于SHAP算法对lcf的重要性进行排序,使用不同数量的lcf按重要性顺序产生多个采样空间。根据贝叶斯优化算法选择最优采样空间。然后,利用随机森林(RF)和极端梯度增强(XGBoost)模型,在传统随机抽样的基础上,对中国茶陵县、鄢陵县和桂东县进行了敏感性评估。结果表明,与传统的RF和XGBoost模型相比,改进模型的AUC分别提高了8.2%和9.0%,具有更好的性能。此外,基于shap的采样框架在不同地质地貌条件的研究区域表现出良好的适应性,表明其可能可转移到其他区域,尽管仍需要局部优化参数设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoscience frontiers
Geoscience frontiers Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
147
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Geoscience Frontiers (GSF) is the Journal of China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. It publishes peer-reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences. GSF covers various research areas including petrology and geochemistry, lithospheric architecture and mantle dynamics, global tectonics, economic geology and fuel exploration, geophysics, stratigraphy and paleontology, environmental and engineering geology, astrogeology, and the nexus of resources-energy-emissions-climate under Sustainable Development Goals. The journal aims to bridge innovative, provocative, and challenging concepts and models in these fields, providing insights on correlations and evolution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书