Lei-Lei Liu , Can Duan , Jun-Hua Gao , Hao Xiao , Wen-Qing Zhu , Can Yang
{"title":"Landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning with a novel SHAP-based sampling strategy","authors":"Lei-Lei Liu , Can Duan , Jun-Hua Gao , Hao Xiao , Wen-Qing Zhu , Can Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The landslide and non-landslide samples are important inputs for machine learning-based landslide susceptibility assessment. Compared to landslide samples, non-landslide samples generally present higher uncertainty due to random sampling. However, most sampling strategies (e.g., the feature space-based) for non-landslides only consider the characteristics of a single factor or the overall characteristics of all factors, which subsequently leads to either excessive artificial concentration of non-landslide samples or sampling information redundancy. To address these issues, a SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) based sampling strategy considering combined characteristics of landslide conditioning factors (LCFs) is proposed. This strategy sorts the importance of LCFs based on SHAP algorithm and generates multiple sampling spaces using different numbers of LCFs in the sense of importance order. The optimal sampling space is selected according to the Bayesian optimization algorithm. Then, random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models are utilized to assess the susceptibility of Chaling County, Yanling County, and Guidong County, China, based on the proposed strategy and traditional random sampling. The results indicate that, compared with the traditional RF and XGBoost models, the improved models show better performance with an 8.2% and 9.0% increase in the AUC, respectively. Furthermore, the SHAP-based sampling framework demonstrates good adaptability across the study areas with different geological and geomorphic conditions, suggesting its potential transferability to other regions, although local optimization of parameter settings may still be required.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12711,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience frontiers","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102188"},"PeriodicalIF":12.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987125001938","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The landslide and non-landslide samples are important inputs for machine learning-based landslide susceptibility assessment. Compared to landslide samples, non-landslide samples generally present higher uncertainty due to random sampling. However, most sampling strategies (e.g., the feature space-based) for non-landslides only consider the characteristics of a single factor or the overall characteristics of all factors, which subsequently leads to either excessive artificial concentration of non-landslide samples or sampling information redundancy. To address these issues, a SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) based sampling strategy considering combined characteristics of landslide conditioning factors (LCFs) is proposed. This strategy sorts the importance of LCFs based on SHAP algorithm and generates multiple sampling spaces using different numbers of LCFs in the sense of importance order. The optimal sampling space is selected according to the Bayesian optimization algorithm. Then, random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models are utilized to assess the susceptibility of Chaling County, Yanling County, and Guidong County, China, based on the proposed strategy and traditional random sampling. The results indicate that, compared with the traditional RF and XGBoost models, the improved models show better performance with an 8.2% and 9.0% increase in the AUC, respectively. Furthermore, the SHAP-based sampling framework demonstrates good adaptability across the study areas with different geological and geomorphic conditions, suggesting its potential transferability to other regions, although local optimization of parameter settings may still be required.
Geoscience frontiersEarth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
147
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍:
Geoscience Frontiers (GSF) is the Journal of China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. It publishes peer-reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences. GSF covers various research areas including petrology and geochemistry, lithospheric architecture and mantle dynamics, global tectonics, economic geology and fuel exploration, geophysics, stratigraphy and paleontology, environmental and engineering geology, astrogeology, and the nexus of resources-energy-emissions-climate under Sustainable Development Goals. The journal aims to bridge innovative, provocative, and challenging concepts and models in these fields, providing insights on correlations and evolution.