Jacqueline M. Vogel, Abigail S. Golden, Marissa L. Baskett, Timothy E. Essington, Dan Holland, Katherine E. Mills, Arielle Levine
{"title":"Fisheries Managers Acknowledge the Importance of Adaptive Traits but Report Limited Ability to Influence Them","authors":"Jacqueline M. Vogel, Abigail S. Golden, Marissa L. Baskett, Timothy E. Essington, Dan Holland, Katherine E. Mills, Arielle Levine","doi":"10.1111/faf.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marine fishery management systems are experiencing unprecedented pressure from climate change. Prior research has identified adaptive traits that, when present in a management system, can promote effective responses to these changes and minimise negative outcomes for fish and fishery systems. Understanding the extent to which managers identify these traits as important and actively influencing management can identify gaps and opportunities for putting this theory into practice. To address this, we surveyed 321 fishery management professionals and scientists across all eight U.S. fisheries management regions. Questions focused on 16 adaptive traits related to topics such as systemic flexibility, opportunities for knowledge exchange and agency to act. For each trait, at least 68% of respondents identified the trait as important for supporting adaptation in their region. The two traits relating to fishermen and management's ability to learn and innovate were the most widely identified as important for adaptation. However, when asked about the role of management in influencing these traits, positive perceptions dropped by about 20% (at most 44% agreement per trait). Perceived importance and influence of adaptive traits significantly varied by the education level of survey respondents, with higher education levels correlating with higher perceived trait importance. Mapping this mismatch between perceived importance of adaptive traits and the ability of management to address them provides a blueprint for areas where a shared understanding of climate‐ready fishery goals would benefit both fishermen and regulators under future change.","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70075","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Marine fishery management systems are experiencing unprecedented pressure from climate change. Prior research has identified adaptive traits that, when present in a management system, can promote effective responses to these changes and minimise negative outcomes for fish and fishery systems. Understanding the extent to which managers identify these traits as important and actively influencing management can identify gaps and opportunities for putting this theory into practice. To address this, we surveyed 321 fishery management professionals and scientists across all eight U.S. fisheries management regions. Questions focused on 16 adaptive traits related to topics such as systemic flexibility, opportunities for knowledge exchange and agency to act. For each trait, at least 68% of respondents identified the trait as important for supporting adaptation in their region. The two traits relating to fishermen and management's ability to learn and innovate were the most widely identified as important for adaptation. However, when asked about the role of management in influencing these traits, positive perceptions dropped by about 20% (at most 44% agreement per trait). Perceived importance and influence of adaptive traits significantly varied by the education level of survey respondents, with higher education levels correlating with higher perceived trait importance. Mapping this mismatch between perceived importance of adaptive traits and the ability of management to address them provides a blueprint for areas where a shared understanding of climate‐ready fishery goals would benefit both fishermen and regulators under future change.
期刊介绍:
Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.