Diversity and Subjectivity of Model Uncertainty Specification in Global Tuna Stock Assessment

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Runze Wang, Sisong Dong, André E. Punt, Jiangfeng Zhu, Fan Zhang
{"title":"Diversity and Subjectivity of Model Uncertainty Specification in Global Tuna Stock Assessment","authors":"Runze Wang, Sisong Dong, André E. Punt, Jiangfeng Zhu, Fan Zhang","doi":"10.1111/faf.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a major source of scientific uncertainty in stock assessments and fisheries management, model uncertainty in tuna stock assessments is primarily examined using sensitivity analysis and ensemble modelling. However, uncertainty specifications (i.e., factors and levels included in uncertainty analyses) for tuna assessments vary within and among tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (tRFMOs). We reviewed the uncertainty specification in 133 stock assessments conducted over the past 20 years by five tRFMOs, covering seven major commercial tuna species. Our analysis revealed four key findings: although a wide range of uncertainty specifications has been applied, only a few factors are commonly considered across assessments; patterns in uncertainty specification are more closely aligned with management organisation than with species; the emphasis on different factors has shifted over time (e.g., increasing attention to growth and decreasing focus on data weighting); and a change to the modelling platform is a key factor leading to changing uncertainty specifications between successive assessments. Our findings demonstrated the diverse range of uncertainty specifications in tuna stock assessments, and revealed the important role of subjective factors in making these selections. We propose some best practices for specifying uncertainty to enhance consistency and reducing subjectivity across tuna stock assessments.","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70077","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a major source of scientific uncertainty in stock assessments and fisheries management, model uncertainty in tuna stock assessments is primarily examined using sensitivity analysis and ensemble modelling. However, uncertainty specifications (i.e., factors and levels included in uncertainty analyses) for tuna assessments vary within and among tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (tRFMOs). We reviewed the uncertainty specification in 133 stock assessments conducted over the past 20 years by five tRFMOs, covering seven major commercial tuna species. Our analysis revealed four key findings: although a wide range of uncertainty specifications has been applied, only a few factors are commonly considered across assessments; patterns in uncertainty specification are more closely aligned with management organisation than with species; the emphasis on different factors has shifted over time (e.g., increasing attention to growth and decreasing focus on data weighting); and a change to the modelling platform is a key factor leading to changing uncertainty specifications between successive assessments. Our findings demonstrated the diverse range of uncertainty specifications in tuna stock assessments, and revealed the important role of subjective factors in making these selections. We propose some best practices for specifying uncertainty to enhance consistency and reducing subjectivity across tuna stock assessments.
全球金枪鱼种群评估中模型不确定性规范的多样性和主观性
作为种群评估和渔业管理中科学不确定性的主要来源,金枪鱼种群评估中的模型不确定性主要使用敏感性分析和集合模型进行检查。然而,金枪鱼评估的不确定性规格(即不确定性分析中包括的因素和水平)在金枪鱼区域渔业管理组织(tRFMOs)内部和之间各不相同。我们回顾了5个tRFMOs在过去20年中进行的133次种群评估的不确定度规格,涵盖了7个主要的商业金枪鱼品种。我们的分析揭示了四个关键发现:尽管应用了广泛的不确定性规格,但在评估中通常只考虑几个因素;不确定性规范中的模式与管理组织的关系比与物种的关系更密切;随着时间的推移,对不同因素的强调已经发生了变化(例如,越来越重视增长,越来越不重视数据权重);建模平台的变化是导致连续评估之间不确定性规格变化的关键因素。我们的研究结果显示了金枪鱼种群评估中不确定度规格的多样性,并揭示了主观因素在这些选择中的重要作用。我们提出了一些最佳实践来指定不确定性,以增强一致性和减少金枪鱼种群评估的主观性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fish and Fisheries
Fish and Fisheries 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书