Runze Wang, Sisong Dong, André E. Punt, Jiangfeng Zhu, Fan Zhang
{"title":"Diversity and Subjectivity of Model Uncertainty Specification in Global Tuna Stock Assessment","authors":"Runze Wang, Sisong Dong, André E. Punt, Jiangfeng Zhu, Fan Zhang","doi":"10.1111/faf.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a major source of scientific uncertainty in stock assessments and fisheries management, model uncertainty in tuna stock assessments is primarily examined using sensitivity analysis and ensemble modelling. However, uncertainty specifications (i.e., factors and levels included in uncertainty analyses) for tuna assessments vary within and among tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (tRFMOs). We reviewed the uncertainty specification in 133 stock assessments conducted over the past 20 years by five tRFMOs, covering seven major commercial tuna species. Our analysis revealed four key findings: although a wide range of uncertainty specifications has been applied, only a few factors are commonly considered across assessments; patterns in uncertainty specification are more closely aligned with management organisation than with species; the emphasis on different factors has shifted over time (e.g., increasing attention to growth and decreasing focus on data weighting); and a change to the modelling platform is a key factor leading to changing uncertainty specifications between successive assessments. Our findings demonstrated the diverse range of uncertainty specifications in tuna stock assessments, and revealed the important role of subjective factors in making these selections. We propose some best practices for specifying uncertainty to enhance consistency and reducing subjectivity across tuna stock assessments.","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70077","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As a major source of scientific uncertainty in stock assessments and fisheries management, model uncertainty in tuna stock assessments is primarily examined using sensitivity analysis and ensemble modelling. However, uncertainty specifications (i.e., factors and levels included in uncertainty analyses) for tuna assessments vary within and among tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (tRFMOs). We reviewed the uncertainty specification in 133 stock assessments conducted over the past 20 years by five tRFMOs, covering seven major commercial tuna species. Our analysis revealed four key findings: although a wide range of uncertainty specifications has been applied, only a few factors are commonly considered across assessments; patterns in uncertainty specification are more closely aligned with management organisation than with species; the emphasis on different factors has shifted over time (e.g., increasing attention to growth and decreasing focus on data weighting); and a change to the modelling platform is a key factor leading to changing uncertainty specifications between successive assessments. Our findings demonstrated the diverse range of uncertainty specifications in tuna stock assessments, and revealed the important role of subjective factors in making these selections. We propose some best practices for specifying uncertainty to enhance consistency and reducing subjectivity across tuna stock assessments.
期刊介绍:
Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.