Marie-Luise Aitzetmüller-Klietz, Laura Acar, Mahmut Öztürk, Maximilian Kückelhaus, Martial Mboulla Nzomo, Ursula Marschall, Matthias Aitzetmüller-Klietz, Tobias Hirsch
{"title":"Lipödem – eine verborgene Erkrankung mit einer Prävalenz von 0,95% – basierend auf 8,7 Millionen Versicherten.","authors":"Marie-Luise Aitzetmüller-Klietz, Laura Acar, Mahmut Öztürk, Maximilian Kückelhaus, Martial Mboulla Nzomo, Ursula Marschall, Matthias Aitzetmüller-Klietz, Tobias Hirsch","doi":"10.1055/a-2763-4919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Despite ongoing research, the prevalence of lipoedema still relies on estimates, with figures in the recent literature ranging from 1% to 10%. Large-scale epidemiological studies on lipoedema are lacking.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study analysed health insurance claims data from the second-largest health insurance fund in Germany (8.7 million insured individuals), focusing on women with lipoedema stages I-III. Propensity score matching was performed to compare co-morbidities in lipoedema patients with those in the general patient population and in patients with grade III obesity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2017 and 2021, the documented prevalence of lipoedema increased by 123.5% (from 3.89 to 8.69 cases per 1,000 insured individuals). Stage II lipoedema was the most common, with a prevalence of 0.34% in 2021. Extrapolation of the data to the total population suggests approximately 338.200 affected women in Germany in 2021, corresponding to a prevalence of 0.95%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the first to provide a robust nationwide extrapolation of lipoedema prevalence. The findings highlight the underutilisation of conservative treatment and the significant comorbidities present in the affected patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":520635,"journal":{"name":"Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V...","volume":" ","pages":"285-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V...","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2763-4919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Despite ongoing research, the prevalence of lipoedema still relies on estimates, with figures in the recent literature ranging from 1% to 10%. Large-scale epidemiological studies on lipoedema are lacking.
Patients and methods: This retrospective observational study analysed health insurance claims data from the second-largest health insurance fund in Germany (8.7 million insured individuals), focusing on women with lipoedema stages I-III. Propensity score matching was performed to compare co-morbidities in lipoedema patients with those in the general patient population and in patients with grade III obesity.
Results: Between 2017 and 2021, the documented prevalence of lipoedema increased by 123.5% (from 3.89 to 8.69 cases per 1,000 insured individuals). Stage II lipoedema was the most common, with a prevalence of 0.34% in 2021. Extrapolation of the data to the total population suggests approximately 338.200 affected women in Germany in 2021, corresponding to a prevalence of 0.95%.
Conclusions: This study is the first to provide a robust nationwide extrapolation of lipoedema prevalence. The findings highlight the underutilisation of conservative treatment and the significant comorbidities present in the affected patient population.