Comparison of Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Properties of a New Endodontic Sealer against Enterococcus faecalis with AH Plus Sealer.

Shahriar Shahi, Solmaz Maleki Dizaj, Naiemeh Motallebi, Simin Sharifi, Danial Haghighi, Majid Yaltaghiani
{"title":"Comparison of Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Properties of a New Endodontic Sealer against Enterococcus faecalis with AH Plus Sealer.","authors":"Shahriar Shahi, Solmaz Maleki Dizaj, Naiemeh Motallebi, Simin Sharifi, Danial Haghighi, Majid Yaltaghiani","doi":"10.2174/0118715265387112251115065105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties of a novel endodontic sealer against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis). Long-lasting antimicrobial sealers can inhibit bacterial growth and reduce persistent infections following root canal treatment. The primary objective was to compare the new sealer with the AH Plus sealer in terms of antimicrobial and antibiofilm efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five experimental sealer formulations (Groups A-E) were prepared using the spatula mixing method. Disks (6 mm diameter) were fabricated and evaluated using colony-forming unit (CFU) counts and disk diffusion assays. Biofilm formation by E. faecalis was assessed prior to testing the antibiofilm activity, which was quantified using the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group D and AH Plus sealer demonstrated the lowest CFU counts among the new sealer formulations (P>0.05). Group D exhibited the largest inhibition zone compared to the other experimental groups (P>0.05). The mean MBIC against E. faecalis was 256 μg/mL for both Group D and AH Plus sealer.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The newly developed sealer (Group D) displayed antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects comparable to AH Plus sealer against E. faecalis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Group D shows promise as a candidate for further evaluation in clinical studies, demonstrating efficacy similar to the commercially available AH Plus sealer.</p>","PeriodicalId":101326,"journal":{"name":"Infectious disorders drug targets","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious disorders drug targets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118715265387112251115065105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties of a novel endodontic sealer against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis). Long-lasting antimicrobial sealers can inhibit bacterial growth and reduce persistent infections following root canal treatment. The primary objective was to compare the new sealer with the AH Plus sealer in terms of antimicrobial and antibiofilm efficacy.

Methods: Five experimental sealer formulations (Groups A-E) were prepared using the spatula mixing method. Disks (6 mm diameter) were fabricated and evaluated using colony-forming unit (CFU) counts and disk diffusion assays. Biofilm formation by E. faecalis was assessed prior to testing the antibiofilm activity, which was quantified using the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC).

Results: Group D and AH Plus sealer demonstrated the lowest CFU counts among the new sealer formulations (P>0.05). Group D exhibited the largest inhibition zone compared to the other experimental groups (P>0.05). The mean MBIC against E. faecalis was 256 μg/mL for both Group D and AH Plus sealer.

Discussion: The newly developed sealer (Group D) displayed antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects comparable to AH Plus sealer against E. faecalis.

Conclusion: Group D shows promise as a candidate for further evaluation in clinical studies, demonstrating efficacy similar to the commercially available AH Plus sealer.

一种新型牙髓封闭剂与AH +封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌和抗菌膜性能比较。
简介:本研究旨在评价一种新型牙髓密封剂对粪肠球菌(E. faecalis)的抗菌和抗菌膜性能。长效抗菌封口剂可以抑制细菌生长,减少根管治疗后的持续感染。主要目的是比较新的封口剂与AH加封口剂在抗菌和抗生物膜功效方面。方法:采用刮刀混合法制备5种实验封口剂配方(A-E组)。制作圆盘(直径6 mm),并使用菌落形成单位(CFU)计数和圆盘扩散试验进行评估。在测试抗生素活性之前,评估粪肠杆菌形成的生物膜,并使用最低生物膜抑制浓度(MBIC)对其进行量化。结果:D组和AH +封口剂在新剂型中CFU计数最低(P < 0.05)。与其他实验组相比,D组抑制区最大(P < 0.05)。D组和AH +封印剂对粪肠杆菌的平均MBIC均为256 μg/mL。讨论:新开发的封口剂(D组)显示出与AH Plus封口剂相当的抗菌和抗生物膜效果。结论:D组有希望在临床研究中进一步评估,其疗效与市售AH Plus封口剂相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书