Jenny Ehrmanntraut, Matthias Aitzetmüller, Melodi Motamedi, Sixtus Allert
{"title":"[Before-and-After Pictures in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: European Legal Perspectives and an Approach for Germany].","authors":"Jenny Ehrmanntraut, Matthias Aitzetmüller, Melodi Motamedi, Sixtus Allert","doi":"10.1055/a-2787-5156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In plastic and aesthetic surgery, before-and-after photographs play a central role in patient education and decision-making. The recent court decision of the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH) on the use of before-and-after images in minimally invasive treatments (e. g., hyaluronic acid injections, case no. I ZR 170/24, issued July 31, 2025) highlights an ongoing conflict: according to recent case law in Germany, the publication of before-and-after photographs - particularly for advertising purposes and in procedures \"without medical necessity\" - is prohibited under the German Drug Advertising Act (Heilmittelwerbegesetz, HWG) §11, the Medical Professional Code ((Muster-)Berufsordnung für die in Deutschland tätigen Ärztinnen und Ärzte, MBO), and the Unfair Competition Act (Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb, UWG). Nevertheless, such images can still be found online, as they are legally hosted on foreign servers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a doctoral dissertation project, the German legal framework was analyzed in international comparison, and a quantitative survey of patients and plastic surgeons was conducted. The survey addressed topics such as sources of information, willingness to consent to the publication of personal images, and the influence of social media. Data were analyzed descriptively and tested for statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings demonstrate a clear demand for before-and-after images among both patients and physicians. Controlled legalization of such photographs could enhance transparency, promote realistic expectations, and increase patient safety. The introduction of a standardized seal or disclaimer is recommended to ensure authenticity and ethical acceptability. Legislative adjustments should safeguard against misleading representations while upholding ethical standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":520635,"journal":{"name":"Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V...","volume":" ","pages":"338-343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V...","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2787-5156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In plastic and aesthetic surgery, before-and-after photographs play a central role in patient education and decision-making. The recent court decision of the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH) on the use of before-and-after images in minimally invasive treatments (e. g., hyaluronic acid injections, case no. I ZR 170/24, issued July 31, 2025) highlights an ongoing conflict: according to recent case law in Germany, the publication of before-and-after photographs - particularly for advertising purposes and in procedures "without medical necessity" - is prohibited under the German Drug Advertising Act (Heilmittelwerbegesetz, HWG) §11, the Medical Professional Code ((Muster-)Berufsordnung für die in Deutschland tätigen Ärztinnen und Ärzte, MBO), and the Unfair Competition Act (Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb, UWG). Nevertheless, such images can still be found online, as they are legally hosted on foreign servers.
Methods: As part of a doctoral dissertation project, the German legal framework was analyzed in international comparison, and a quantitative survey of patients and plastic surgeons was conducted. The survey addressed topics such as sources of information, willingness to consent to the publication of personal images, and the influence of social media. Data were analyzed descriptively and tested for statistical significance.
Conclusion: The findings demonstrate a clear demand for before-and-after images among both patients and physicians. Controlled legalization of such photographs could enhance transparency, promote realistic expectations, and increase patient safety. The introduction of a standardized seal or disclaimer is recommended to ensure authenticity and ethical acceptability. Legislative adjustments should safeguard against misleading representations while upholding ethical standards.
在整形和美容手术中,前后对比照片在患者教育和决策中起着核心作用。德国联邦法院(Bundesgerichtshof, BGH)最近就在微创治疗中使用前后对比图像(例如:透明质酸注射,病例号。I ZR 170/24(2025年7月31日发布)强调了持续的冲突:根据德国最近的判例法,《德国药品广告法》(Heilmittelwerbegesetz, HWG)第11条、《医疗专业守则》(Berufsordnung f r die in Deutschland tätigen Ärztinnen und Ärzte, MBO)和《不正当竞争法》(Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb, UWG)禁止发布前后对比照片,特别是用于广告目的和“无医疗需要”的程序。尽管如此,这些图片仍然可以在网上找到,因为它们是合法托管在外国服务器上的。作为博士论文项目的一部分,在国际比较中分析了德国的法律框架,并对患者和整形外科医生进行了定量调查。调查涉及的主题包括信息来源、同意发布个人照片的意愿以及社交媒体的影响。对数据进行描述性分析并检验统计显著性。研究结果表明,患者和医生对前后对比图像都有明确的需求。此类照片的受控合法化可以提高透明度,促进现实的期望,并增加患者的安全。推荐采用标准化印章或免责声明,以确保真实性和道德可接受性。立法调整应在维护道德标准的同时防范误导性陈述。