Diffusion MRI sampling schemes bias diffusion metrics and tractography.

IF 2.5
Frontiers in neuroimaging Pub Date : 2026-02-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnimg.2026.1670604
Ivanei Bramati, Diego Szczupak, Marina Carneiro Monteiro, Fernanda Meireles, Daniel Menezes Guimarães, Ryan J Dean, Lynn K Paul, Fernanda Tovar-Moll
{"title":"Diffusion MRI sampling schemes bias diffusion metrics and tractography.","authors":"Ivanei Bramati, Diego Szczupak, Marina Carneiro Monteiro, Fernanda Meireles, Daniel Menezes Guimarães, Ryan J Dean, Lynn K Paul, Fernanda Tovar-Moll","doi":"10.3389/fnimg.2026.1670604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diffusion MRI is increasingly used to study white-matter architecture, but tractography and diffusion metrics can be biased by different sampling schemes. We assessed systematic differences across four common protocols-single-shell high-angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI), Siemens clinical multi-shell (Sms), diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI), and Human Connectome Project multi-shell (HCPms)-in healthy adults and individuals with corpus callosum dysgenesis (CCD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All data were acquired on a single 3 T scanner and processed uniformly to extract fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), effective contrast-to-noise ratio (eCNR), and orientation dispersion within the corpus callosum (CC), corona radiata (CR), and centrum semiovale (CSO). In controls, we measured tract volumes for CC, bilateral CR, anterior commissure (AC) and posterior commissure (PC), and streamline counts for AC and PC; in CCD, we quantified volumes of the Probst and sigmoid bundles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across participants, FA and MD showed moderate cross-scheme correlations for most ROIs, but matched means were rare (only Sms-HARDI in CC). eCNR and dispersion exhibited few cross-scheme correlations; however, means were similar for eCNR between Sms and HCPms and for dispersion among HARDI, DSI, and HCPms. Tract-based volumes correlated across Sms, DSI, and HCPms for CC in controls and for the right sigmoid and both Probst bundles in CCD. DSI and HCPms yielded similar volumes in all ROIs (controls and CCD). In controls, Sms volumes agreed with DSI/HCPms in CR, but were lower in CC and in all CCD ROIs. HARDI produced higher volumes in CC and bilateral CR in controls and in all CCD ROIs. For AC and PC in controls, tract-based means (volumes, streamlines, streamlines/volume) were consistent across schemes; nonetheless, correlations were limited-streamlines and streamlines/volume correlated for Sms, DSI, and HARDI in AC, and for DSI and HCPms in PC.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings demonstrate systematic differences in voxel-wise metrics and tractography outcomes from four diffusion-sampling schemes. In addition to qualitatively informing attempts to consolidate or contrast data across schemes, future work could explore regression-based harmonization-and other methods-to reduce residual bias and enable pooled analyses across diverse protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":73094,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in neuroimaging","volume":"5 ","pages":"1670604"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12975589/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnimg.2026.1670604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diffusion MRI is increasingly used to study white-matter architecture, but tractography and diffusion metrics can be biased by different sampling schemes. We assessed systematic differences across four common protocols-single-shell high-angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI), Siemens clinical multi-shell (Sms), diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI), and Human Connectome Project multi-shell (HCPms)-in healthy adults and individuals with corpus callosum dysgenesis (CCD).

Methods: All data were acquired on a single 3 T scanner and processed uniformly to extract fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), effective contrast-to-noise ratio (eCNR), and orientation dispersion within the corpus callosum (CC), corona radiata (CR), and centrum semiovale (CSO). In controls, we measured tract volumes for CC, bilateral CR, anterior commissure (AC) and posterior commissure (PC), and streamline counts for AC and PC; in CCD, we quantified volumes of the Probst and sigmoid bundles.

Results: Across participants, FA and MD showed moderate cross-scheme correlations for most ROIs, but matched means were rare (only Sms-HARDI in CC). eCNR and dispersion exhibited few cross-scheme correlations; however, means were similar for eCNR between Sms and HCPms and for dispersion among HARDI, DSI, and HCPms. Tract-based volumes correlated across Sms, DSI, and HCPms for CC in controls and for the right sigmoid and both Probst bundles in CCD. DSI and HCPms yielded similar volumes in all ROIs (controls and CCD). In controls, Sms volumes agreed with DSI/HCPms in CR, but were lower in CC and in all CCD ROIs. HARDI produced higher volumes in CC and bilateral CR in controls and in all CCD ROIs. For AC and PC in controls, tract-based means (volumes, streamlines, streamlines/volume) were consistent across schemes; nonetheless, correlations were limited-streamlines and streamlines/volume correlated for Sms, DSI, and HARDI in AC, and for DSI and HCPms in PC.

Discussion: These findings demonstrate systematic differences in voxel-wise metrics and tractography outcomes from four diffusion-sampling schemes. In addition to qualitatively informing attempts to consolidate or contrast data across schemes, future work could explore regression-based harmonization-and other methods-to reduce residual bias and enable pooled analyses across diverse protocols.

弥散MRI采样方案偏置弥散度量和束状图。
扩散MRI越来越多地用于研究白质结构,但束状图和扩散指标可能因不同的采样方案而产生偏差。我们评估了健康成人和胼胝体发育不良(CCD)患者在四种常见方案中的系统差异——单壳高角分辨率扩散成像(HARDI)、西门子临床多壳成像(Sms)、扩散光谱成像(DSI)和人类连接组计划多壳成像(HCPms)。方法:所有数据均在一台3 T扫描仪上获取,并进行统一处理,提取分数各向异性(FA)、平均扩散率(MD)、有效对比噪声比(eCNR)和胼胝体(CC)、辐射冠(CR)和半瓣膜中心(CSO)内的取向弥散。在对照组中,我们测量了CC、双侧CR、前连合(AC)和后连合(PC)的束体积,以及AC和PC的流线计数;在CCD中,我们量化了Probst束和sigmoid束的体积。结果:在参与者中,FA和MD对大多数roi显示适度的交叉方案相关性,但匹配的平均值很少(CC中只有Sms-HARDI)。eCNR与色散表现出很少的交叉方案相关性;然而,Sms和HCPms之间的eCNR平均值以及HARDI, DSI和HCPms之间的分散程度相似。基于导管的体积在对照组CC的Sms、DSI和HCPms中相关,在CCD的右s形束和两个Probst束中相关。DSI和HCPms在所有roi(对照和CCD)中产生相似的体积。在对照组中,Sms体积与CR的DSI/HCPms一致,但在CC和所有CCD roi中较低。HARDI在对照和所有CCD roi中产生了更高的CC和双边CR。对于控制中的AC和PC,基于通道的方法(体积、流线、流线/体积)在不同方案中是一致的;尽管如此,相关性是有限的- AC中的Sms, DSI和HARDI以及PC中的DSI和HCPms的流线和流线/体积相关。讨论:这些发现证明了四种扩散采样方案在体素指标和轨迹成像结果上的系统性差异。除了为整合或对比不同方案的数据提供定性信息之外,未来的工作还可以探索基于回归的协调和其他方法,以减少剩余偏差,并实现跨不同方案的汇总分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书