Surface Texture and Clinical Performance of Milled BioHPP Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Single Posterior Crowns Veneered with Two Different Techniques: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Q3 Dentistry
Ahmed Kamal Dief, Omnia Elshehy, Omnia Nabil
{"title":"Surface Texture and Clinical Performance of Milled BioHPP Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Single Posterior Crowns Veneered with Two Different Techniques: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Ahmed Kamal Dief, Omnia Elshehy, Omnia Nabil","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-4007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the present study was to evaluate surface texture (ST) and clinical performance (CP) of milled biocompatible high-performance polymer (BioHPP) polyetheretherketone (PEEK) single posterior crowns veneered with two different techniques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 32 patients requiring posterior crowns were divided randomly into two equal groups (<i>n</i> = 16) according to the veneering technique used. The manual group included patients receiving milled BioHPP PEEK copings veneered with manual layering, and the computer-aided designing (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) group included patients receiving milled BioHPP PEEK copings veneered with CAD/CAM composite resin [high impact performance composite (HIPC)]. Surface texture and CP were evaluated at cementation time and every 6 months for 1-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both veneering techniques performed comparably in terms of maintaining ST and CP for 1-year follow-up. Regarding ST, the results (<i>p</i> = 0.8993) indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in the survival patterns between the two groups over the study period. Also, for CP, there was no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> > 0.9999) between the CAD/CAM composite resin veneered and manually veneered BioHPP PEEK copings over the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Milled BioHPP PEEK copings veneered with manual veneering and CAD/CAM composite resin veneering showed clinically accepted ST and CP after 1 year of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Polyetheretherketone veneered crowns are a valid treatment option for restoring posterior endodontically treated teeth when properly finished and polished following the manufacturer's recommendation. How to cite this article: Dief AK, Elshehy O, Nabil O. Surface Texture and Clinical Performance of Milled BioHPP Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Single Posterior Crowns Veneered with Two Different Techniques: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2026;27(1):67-77.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":"67-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-4007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate surface texture (ST) and clinical performance (CP) of milled biocompatible high-performance polymer (BioHPP) polyetheretherketone (PEEK) single posterior crowns veneered with two different techniques.

Materials and methods: A total of 32 patients requiring posterior crowns were divided randomly into two equal groups (n = 16) according to the veneering technique used. The manual group included patients receiving milled BioHPP PEEK copings veneered with manual layering, and the computer-aided designing (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) group included patients receiving milled BioHPP PEEK copings veneered with CAD/CAM composite resin [high impact performance composite (HIPC)]. Surface texture and CP were evaluated at cementation time and every 6 months for 1-year follow-up period.

Results: Both veneering techniques performed comparably in terms of maintaining ST and CP for 1-year follow-up. Regarding ST, the results (p = 0.8993) indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in the survival patterns between the two groups over the study period. Also, for CP, there was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.9999) between the CAD/CAM composite resin veneered and manually veneered BioHPP PEEK copings over the study period.

Conclusion: Milled BioHPP PEEK copings veneered with manual veneering and CAD/CAM composite resin veneering showed clinically accepted ST and CP after 1 year of follow-up.

Clinical significance: Polyetheretherketone veneered crowns are a valid treatment option for restoring posterior endodontically treated teeth when properly finished and polished following the manufacturer's recommendation. How to cite this article: Dief AK, Elshehy O, Nabil O. Surface Texture and Clinical Performance of Milled BioHPP Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Single Posterior Crowns Veneered with Two Different Techniques: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2026;27(1):67-77.

两种不同工艺的聚醚醚酮(PEEK)单后牙冠的表面结构和临床性能:随机对照临床试验
目的:本研究的目的是评估两种不同技术的磨生物相容性高性能聚合物(BioHPP)聚醚醚酮(PEEK)单后牙冠的表面结构(ST)和临床性能(CP)。材料与方法:32例需要后牙冠的患者根据采用的贴面技术随机分为两组(n = 16)。手工组包括接受手工贴面的铣削BioHPP PEEK涂层的患者,计算机辅助设计(CAD)/计算机辅助制造(CAM)组包括接受用CAD/CAM复合树脂贴面的铣削BioHPP PEEK涂层的患者[高冲击性能复合材料(HIPC)]。术后随访1年,每6个月进行一次表面纹理和CP评价。结果:在1年的随访中,两种贴面技术在维持ST和CP方面表现相当。ST方面,结果(p = 0.8993)显示两组在研究期间的生存模式无统计学差异。此外,在研究期间,CAD/CAM复合树脂贴面和手工贴面BioHPP PEEK贴面之间的CP没有统计学上的显著差异(p > 0.9999)。结论:经过1年的随访,手工贴面和CAD/CAM复合树脂贴面的bihpp PEEK覆膜在ST和CP方面均为临床可接受的。临床意义:聚醚醚酮贴面冠是修复后牙根管治疗后牙的有效治疗选择,只要按照制造商的建议进行适当的加工和抛光。Dief AK, Elshehy O, Nabil O.两种不同工艺的聚醚醚酮(PEEK)单后牙冠的表面结构和临床性能:随机对照临床试验。现代医疗实践[J]; 2009;27(1):67-77。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书