Skin Colour Does Not Define Ethnicity: Quantifying Variation and Overlap Across Diverse Populations.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Yan Lu, Kaida Xiao, Changjun Li, Michael Pointer
{"title":"Skin Colour Does Not Define Ethnicity: Quantifying Variation and Overlap Across Diverse Populations.","authors":"Yan Lu, Kaida Xiao, Changjun Li, Michael Pointer","doi":"10.1111/srt.70343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skin colour is a prominent human trait historically used to define ethnicity, yet its validity as a classification tool remains questionable.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We quantitatively analyse over 14 000 skin reflectance measurements from eight ethnically diverse groups in the International Skin Spectra Archive (ISSA), using a standard colour space designed to model human visual perception. We assess intragroup variation and intergroup overlap through two complementary approaches: individual-level perceptual differences and group-level shared gamut volumes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results show that within-group variability in chromaticity and lightness frequently exceeds between-group differences. At the individual level, 89.4% (95% CI: 81.5%-91.9%) of samples have perceptually indistinguishable counterparts across ethnicities. At the group level, the median shared gamut overlap is 60.5% (95% CI: 54.5%-63.6%), indicating substantial overlap in skin colour distributions. The two methods correlate strongly (r = 0.83, p < 0.001), confirming robust intergroup overlap.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Skin colour exhibits high within-group dispersion and extensive between-group overlap. These findings challenge the use of skin colour as a reliable indicator of ethnicity and underscore the need for objective, data-driven classification frameworks. They also highlight the complex, continuous nature of human skin variation, beyond simplistic ethnic categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":21746,"journal":{"name":"Skin Research and Technology","volume":"32 3","pages":"e70343"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13097458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin Research and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.70343","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Skin colour is a prominent human trait historically used to define ethnicity, yet its validity as a classification tool remains questionable.

Materials and methods: We quantitatively analyse over 14 000 skin reflectance measurements from eight ethnically diverse groups in the International Skin Spectra Archive (ISSA), using a standard colour space designed to model human visual perception. We assess intragroup variation and intergroup overlap through two complementary approaches: individual-level perceptual differences and group-level shared gamut volumes.

Results: Results show that within-group variability in chromaticity and lightness frequently exceeds between-group differences. At the individual level, 89.4% (95% CI: 81.5%-91.9%) of samples have perceptually indistinguishable counterparts across ethnicities. At the group level, the median shared gamut overlap is 60.5% (95% CI: 54.5%-63.6%), indicating substantial overlap in skin colour distributions. The two methods correlate strongly (r = 0.83, p < 0.001), confirming robust intergroup overlap.

Conclusion: Skin colour exhibits high within-group dispersion and extensive between-group overlap. These findings challenge the use of skin colour as a reliable indicator of ethnicity and underscore the need for objective, data-driven classification frameworks. They also highlight the complex, continuous nature of human skin variation, beyond simplistic ethnic categories.

肤色不能定义种族:量化不同人群的变异和重叠。
背景:肤色是历史上用来定义种族的重要人类特征,但其作为分类工具的有效性仍然值得怀疑。材料和方法:我们定量分析了国际皮肤光谱档案(ISSA)中来自八个种族不同群体的14000多个皮肤反射率测量值,使用标准色彩空间来模拟人类的视觉感知。我们通过两种互补的方法来评估群体内的变化和群体间的重叠:个体水平的感知差异和群体水平的共享色域体积。结果:结果表明,组内色度和亮度的变化往往超过组间差异。在个体水平上,89.4% (95% CI: 81.5%-91.9%)的样本在不同种族之间具有感知上无法区分的对应物。在群体水平上,共享色域重叠的中位数为60.5% (95% CI: 54.5%-63.6%),表明肤色分布存在大量重叠。这两种方法相关性很强(r = 0.83, p < 0.001),证实了组间重叠。结论:肤色具有较高的群内分散性和广泛的群间重叠性。这些发现对将肤色作为可靠的种族指标提出了挑战,并强调了建立客观、数据驱动的分类框架的必要性。他们还强调了人类皮肤变化的复杂性和连续性,超越了简单的种族分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Skin Research and Technology
Skin Research and Technology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Skin Research and Technology is a clinically-oriented journal on biophysical methods and imaging techniques and how they are used in dermatology, cosmetology and plastic surgery for noninvasive quantification of skin structure and functions. Papers are invited on the development and validation of methods and their application in the characterization of diseased, abnormal and normal skin. Topics include blood flow, colorimetry, thermography, evaporimetry, epidermal humidity, desquamation, profilometry, skin mechanics, epiluminiscence microscopy, high-frequency ultrasonography, confocal microscopy, digital imaging, image analysis and computerized evaluation and magnetic resonance. Noninvasive biochemical methods (such as lipids, keratin and tissue water) and the instrumental evaluation of cytological and histological samples are also covered. The journal has a wide scope and aims to link scientists, clinical researchers and technicians through original articles, communications, editorials and commentaries, letters, reviews, announcements and news. Contributions should be clear, experimentally sound and novel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书