Core stability in women with and without chronic pelvic pain.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-13 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.70103
Hannah V Chatwin, Abhilasha Kumar, Michael Wesolowski, Laura Glaser, Colleen M Fitzgerald, Stacey Bennis
{"title":"Core stability in women with and without chronic pelvic pain.","authors":"Hannah V Chatwin, Abhilasha Kumar, Michael Wesolowski, Laura Glaser, Colleen M Fitzgerald, Stacey Bennis","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.70103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity (PA) and core stability levels are unknown for women with musculoskeletal chronic pelvic pain (CPP) compared to healthy women. At this time, there is no validated treatment method aimed specifically at CPP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To elucidate the PA habits and core stability of women with and without CPP. We hypothesized that aerobic and resistance PA (aPA, rPA) and core stability would differ significantly.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, cross-sectional study. Wilcoxon rank sum tests, simple and multiple linear regressions, and Pearson chi-square test were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Primary and specialty care outpatient physical medicine and rehabilitation, female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery, and gynecology clinics associated with a large tertiary center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We recruited 91 women aged 18-70 years with and without CPP (defined by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Physical activity, core stability scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women with CPP demonstrated lower overall core stability (p = .04). Having CPP predicted a 2-point decrease in overall core score (p < .01). Women with CPP demonstrated significantly worse scores for the supine bridge (p < .01) and prone bridge (p = .03). There were no significant differences in aPA or rPA between women with and without CPP. Pelvic floor muscle strength did not have a significant effect on core scores in women with CPP before or after adjusting for age, parity, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reports a novel finding that women with CPP had significantly reduced core scores (suggestive of weaker core stability) but similar levels of physical activity (aPA and rPA) compared to women without CPP. Future directions will include larger, multicenter, randomized controlled trials to investigate the association between pelvic floor muscles and core stability as well as therapeutic interventions to include specific exercises targeted at improving overall core stability in women with CPP.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":"1184-1193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13686104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.70103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) and core stability levels are unknown for women with musculoskeletal chronic pelvic pain (CPP) compared to healthy women. At this time, there is no validated treatment method aimed specifically at CPP.

Objective: To elucidate the PA habits and core stability of women with and without CPP. We hypothesized that aerobic and resistance PA (aPA, rPA) and core stability would differ significantly.

Design: Prospective, cross-sectional study. Wilcoxon rank sum tests, simple and multiple linear regressions, and Pearson chi-square test were used for analysis.

Setting: Primary and specialty care outpatient physical medicine and rehabilitation, female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery, and gynecology clinics associated with a large tertiary center.

Patients: We recruited 91 women aged 18-70 years with and without CPP (defined by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists).

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Physical activity, core stability scores.

Results: Women with CPP demonstrated lower overall core stability (p = .04). Having CPP predicted a 2-point decrease in overall core score (p < .01). Women with CPP demonstrated significantly worse scores for the supine bridge (p < .01) and prone bridge (p = .03). There were no significant differences in aPA or rPA between women with and without CPP. Pelvic floor muscle strength did not have a significant effect on core scores in women with CPP before or after adjusting for age, parity, and body mass index.

Conclusions: This study reports a novel finding that women with CPP had significantly reduced core scores (suggestive of weaker core stability) but similar levels of physical activity (aPA and rPA) compared to women without CPP. Future directions will include larger, multicenter, randomized controlled trials to investigate the association between pelvic floor muscles and core stability as well as therapeutic interventions to include specific exercises targeted at improving overall core stability in women with CPP.

有或无慢性盆腔疼痛妇女的核心稳定性。
背景:与健康女性相比,患有肌肉骨骼慢性盆腔疼痛(CPP)的女性的身体活动(PA)和核心稳定性水平尚不清楚。目前,尚无针对CPP的有效治疗方法。目的:探讨有和无CPP妇女的PA习惯及核心稳定性。我们假设有氧和阻力PA (aPA, rPA)和核心稳定性会有显著差异。设计:前瞻性横断面研究。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验、单线性和多元线性回归、Pearson卡方检验进行分析。机构:初级和专科护理门诊物理医学和康复,女性骨盆医学和重建外科,以及与大型三级中心相关的妇科诊所。患者:我们招募了91名年龄在18-70岁的女性,有或没有CPP(由美国妇产科医师学会定义)。干预措施:不适用。主要观察指标:身体活动、核心稳定性评分。结果:女性CPP表现出较低的整体核心稳定性(p = 0.04)。结论:本研究报告了一个新的发现,与没有CPP的女性相比,患有CPP的女性核心得分显著降低(表明核心稳定性较弱),但身体活动水平(aPA和rPA)相似。未来的方向将包括更大的、多中心的、随机对照试验,以研究骨盆底肌肉和核心稳定性之间的关系,以及治疗干预措施,包括针对提高CPP女性整体核心稳定性的特定锻炼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书