Do Social Judgements Made From Facial Photographs Predict Those Made In-Person?

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Anthony J Lee, Amy A Z Zhao, Morgan J Sidari, Brendan P Zietsch
{"title":"Do Social Judgements Made From Facial Photographs Predict Those Made In-Person?","authors":"Anthony J Lee, Amy A Z Zhao, Morgan J Sidari, Brendan P Zietsch","doi":"10.1177/17470218261434907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People form rapid social judgements of others based on facial appearance. However, research to date relies on highly standardised photographs. We examined whether social judgements made from photographs predict judgements by different raters after an in-person interaction with the photographed persons. In a 'speed-dating' study, 689 participants (344 males, 345 females) rated each other on several traits after a 3-min interaction. Participants also provided facial photographs, which were rated on the same traits by a separate sample of 356 raters. Physical traits, such as attractiveness and athleticism, showed strong correspondence between face-only and in-person ratings. However, we also found correspondence between some non-physical traits, including creativity and intelligence for males, and confidence and extraversion for females. Correspondence between face-only and in-person judgements are required if personality traits can be accurately inferred from faces or if faces have lasting effects on interpersonal perceptions. Our findings have important implications regarding the ecological validity of research based solely on facial photographs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"2579-2585"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13601687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218261434907","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People form rapid social judgements of others based on facial appearance. However, research to date relies on highly standardised photographs. We examined whether social judgements made from photographs predict judgements by different raters after an in-person interaction with the photographed persons. In a 'speed-dating' study, 689 participants (344 males, 345 females) rated each other on several traits after a 3-min interaction. Participants also provided facial photographs, which were rated on the same traits by a separate sample of 356 raters. Physical traits, such as attractiveness and athleticism, showed strong correspondence between face-only and in-person ratings. However, we also found correspondence between some non-physical traits, including creativity and intelligence for males, and confidence and extraversion for females. Correspondence between face-only and in-person judgements are required if personality traits can be accurately inferred from faces or if faces have lasting effects on interpersonal perceptions. Our findings have important implications regarding the ecological validity of research based solely on facial photographs.

《快报》:从面部照片中做出的社会判断是否能预测面对面的社会判断?
人们会根据外表迅速形成对他人的社会判断。然而,迄今为止的研究依赖于高度标准化的照片。我们研究了从照片中做出的社会判断是否能预测不同评分者在与照片中的人进行面对面互动后做出的判断。在一项“速配”研究中,689名参与者(344名男性,345名女性)在3分钟的互动后,对彼此的几个特征进行了打分。参与者还提供了面部照片,这些照片由356名评分者根据相同的特征进行评分。身体特征,如吸引力和运动能力,在只看脸和面对面的评分中显示出强烈的对应关系。然而,我们也发现了一些非身体特征之间的对应关系,包括男性的创造力和智力,以及女性的自信和外向性。如果人格特征可以从脸中准确推断出来,或者如果脸对人际感知有持久的影响,那么只有脸的判断和面对面的判断之间就需要对应。我们的发现对于仅基于面部照片的研究的生态有效性具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书