Patient perspective of Hesitancies and strategies to increase cancer clinical trial participation.

IF 2.7 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2026-02-12 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2026.10695
Bre-Anne Fifield, Allison Baker, Omer Elkhidir, Nick Philbin, Isabelle Hinch, Nora McVinnie, Amy Llancari, Claudia Pecoraro, Mahsa Rahimi, Tiana Visconti, Alexandra Shoust, Suzanne McMurphy, Kendall Soucie, Caroline Hamm, Lisa A Porter
{"title":"Patient perspective of Hesitancies and strategies to increase cancer clinical trial participation.","authors":"Bre-Anne Fifield, Allison Baker, Omer Elkhidir, Nick Philbin, Isabelle Hinch, Nora McVinnie, Amy Llancari, Claudia Pecoraro, Mahsa Rahimi, Tiana Visconti, Alexandra Shoust, Suzanne McMurphy, Kendall Soucie, Caroline Hamm, Lisa A Porter","doi":"10.1017/cts.2026.10695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Strategies to improve accrual and reduce barriers to cancer clinical trials participation are critical for the advancement and implementation of new treatments and processes to improve cancer patient outcomes. While researchers have identified several barriers to accrual from the perspective of health care providers and patients, mechanisms to address and alleviate these concerns are needed to increase participation and interest in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A focus group of 9 people with lived experience of a cancer diagnosis were accrued randomly and provided with a hands-on research experience and educational resources about clinical trials, followed by a focused group discussion to capture perspectives and/or experiences with clinical trials. Focus groups were transcribed and analyzed via Braun & Clarke's 6-phase reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five key themes were identified as important to increase clinical trial accrual. These included a patient-centered approach, easily digestible educational resources, a personalized understanding of motivating factors, local outreach, and transparency on outcomes and progress of the work. Qualitative input also identified methods that could positively influence accrual rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providing participants with opportunities to see first-hand how research works and data are used was noted as an overwhelmingly positive experience that could improve clinical trial accrual rates. This work confirms several previous findings with respect to patient identified barriers to participation in clinical trials and provides support and a framework for development of knowledge translation strategies to increase awareness and knowledge of the importance of clinical research to improve health outcomes for cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"e39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12975619/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2026.10695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Strategies to improve accrual and reduce barriers to cancer clinical trials participation are critical for the advancement and implementation of new treatments and processes to improve cancer patient outcomes. While researchers have identified several barriers to accrual from the perspective of health care providers and patients, mechanisms to address and alleviate these concerns are needed to increase participation and interest in clinical trials.

Methods: A focus group of 9 people with lived experience of a cancer diagnosis were accrued randomly and provided with a hands-on research experience and educational resources about clinical trials, followed by a focused group discussion to capture perspectives and/or experiences with clinical trials. Focus groups were transcribed and analyzed via Braun & Clarke's 6-phase reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Five key themes were identified as important to increase clinical trial accrual. These included a patient-centered approach, easily digestible educational resources, a personalized understanding of motivating factors, local outreach, and transparency on outcomes and progress of the work. Qualitative input also identified methods that could positively influence accrual rates.

Conclusions: Providing participants with opportunities to see first-hand how research works and data are used was noted as an overwhelmingly positive experience that could improve clinical trial accrual rates. This work confirms several previous findings with respect to patient identified barriers to participation in clinical trials and provides support and a framework for development of knowledge translation strategies to increase awareness and knowledge of the importance of clinical research to improve health outcomes for cancer patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

患者对犹豫的看法和增加癌症临床试验参与的策略。
导读:提高累积性和减少癌症临床试验参与障碍的策略对于推进和实施新的治疗方法和过程以改善癌症患者的预后至关重要。虽然研究人员已经从卫生保健提供者和患者的角度确定了一些障碍,但需要解决和减轻这些问题的机制来增加临床试验的参与和兴趣。方法:随机抽取有癌症诊断经历的9人组成焦点小组,为其提供临床试验的实践研究经验和教育资源,然后进行焦点小组讨论,以获取临床试验的观点和/或经验。通过Braun & Clarke的6阶段反身性主题分析对焦点小组进行转录和分析。结果:五个关键主题被确定为增加临床试验收益的重要因素。这些措施包括以患者为中心的方法、易于消化的教育资源、对激励因素的个性化理解、地方推广以及工作结果和进展的透明度。定性投入还确定了可能对应计费率产生积极影响的方法。结论:让参与者有机会亲眼看到研究工作和数据是如何使用的,这是一种非常积极的体验,可以提高临床试验的应计率。这项工作证实了先前关于患者确定的参与临床试验障碍的若干发现,并为制定知识转化战略提供了支持和框架,以提高对临床研究对改善癌症患者健康结果重要性的认识和了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书