Low Frequency Stimulation and Seizure Induction in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Drug Resistant Epilepsy Undergoing Stereoelectroencephalography.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Caren Armstrong, Samuel B Tomlinson, Patrick Davis, William Ojemann, Sudha Kilaru Kessler, Benjamin C Kennedy, Erin C Conrad, Eric D Marsh
{"title":"Low Frequency Stimulation and Seizure Induction in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Drug Resistant Epilepsy Undergoing Stereoelectroencephalography.","authors":"Caren Armstrong, Samuel B Tomlinson, Patrick Davis, William Ojemann, Sudha Kilaru Kessler, Benjamin C Kennedy, Erin C Conrad, Eric D Marsh","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Describe the tolerability and outcome of direct brain stimulation for seizure induction in children and young adults undergoing intracranial electroencephalography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients received low frequency stimulation (LFS) consisting of 30 seconds of 1 Hz bipolar, biphasic brain stimulation. A subset also received high frequency stimulation (HFS) for clinical purposes. Clinical data regarding epilepsy characteristics, stimulation, and outcomes were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four patients (aged 1.8 to 23.4 years) with pediatric onset epilepsy were enrolled at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. Side effects during LFS included focal sensation (22%) and motor responses (41%). Non-seizure electrographic abnormalities were noted during stimulation in 87% of patients. During LFS, typical clinical seizures were seen in 24% of patients. During HFS (50 Hz), 58% of 36 patients had seizures (71% typical semiology). In 30% of patients, stimulated typical clinical seizures identified a contact not previously identified as part of the seizure onset zone. Of 43 patients who went on to have resection, ablation, or neuromodulation, 39 patients had ≥12 months of follow-up. Although 84% of 19 patients with stimulated typical clinical seizures had a good outcome, 60% of 20 patients with atypical or no clinical seizures during stimulation had good outcomes (P = 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LFS is well tolerated in pediatric and young adult DRE patients and in one fourth of cases identifies potential additional nodes of the seizure network. These data, consistent with adult studies, affirm that LFS has a role complementing HFS in evaluating pediatric DRE patients undergoing stereoelectroencephalography.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Describe the tolerability and outcome of direct brain stimulation for seizure induction in children and young adults undergoing intracranial electroencephalography.

Methods: Patients received low frequency stimulation (LFS) consisting of 30 seconds of 1 Hz bipolar, biphasic brain stimulation. A subset also received high frequency stimulation (HFS) for clinical purposes. Clinical data regarding epilepsy characteristics, stimulation, and outcomes were collected.

Results: Fifty-four patients (aged 1.8 to 23.4 years) with pediatric onset epilepsy were enrolled at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. Side effects during LFS included focal sensation (22%) and motor responses (41%). Non-seizure electrographic abnormalities were noted during stimulation in 87% of patients. During LFS, typical clinical seizures were seen in 24% of patients. During HFS (50 Hz), 58% of 36 patients had seizures (71% typical semiology). In 30% of patients, stimulated typical clinical seizures identified a contact not previously identified as part of the seizure onset zone. Of 43 patients who went on to have resection, ablation, or neuromodulation, 39 patients had ≥12 months of follow-up. Although 84% of 19 patients with stimulated typical clinical seizures had a good outcome, 60% of 20 patients with atypical or no clinical seizures during stimulation had good outcomes (P = 0.09).

Conclusions: LFS is well tolerated in pediatric and young adult DRE patients and in one fourth of cases identifies potential additional nodes of the seizure network. These data, consistent with adult studies, affirm that LFS has a role complementing HFS in evaluating pediatric DRE patients undergoing stereoelectroencephalography.

低频刺激和癫痫诱导在儿童和青年耐药癫痫患者行立体脑电图。
目的:描述接受颅内脑电图检查的儿童和青少年直接脑刺激诱导癫痫发作的耐受性和结果。方法:患者接受低频刺激(LFS),包括30秒的1hz双相双相脑刺激。为了临床目的,一部分患者也接受了高频刺激(HFS)。收集有关癫痫特征、刺激和结局的临床资料。结果:54例儿童癫痫患者(年龄1.8 ~ 23.4岁)入组于费城儿童医院和宾夕法尼亚大学医院。LFS期间的副作用包括局灶感觉(22%)和运动反应(41%)。87%的患者在刺激期间出现非癫痫性电图异常。在LFS期间,24%的患者出现典型的临床癫痫发作。在HFS (50 Hz)期间,36例患者中58%发生癫痫发作(71%为典型符号学)。在30%的患者中,受刺激的典型临床癫痫发作确定了先前未确定为癫痫发作区一部分的接触者。在43例继续进行切除、消融或神经调节的患者中,39例患者随访≥12个月。19例刺激期典型临床发作患者中84%预后良好,20例刺激期非典型或无临床发作患者中60%预后良好(P = 0.09)。结论:LFS在儿童和年轻成人DRE患者中具有良好的耐受性,并且在四分之一的病例中识别出癫痫网络的潜在附加节点。这些数据与成人研究一致,证实了LFS在接受立体脑电图评估儿科DRE患者方面具有补充HFS的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书