Bhavya Bhavya, Ajay Kumar Shukla, Abhijit Rozatkar, Shubham Atal
{"title":"Pharmacological Treatment and Cognition in Bipolar I Disorder: Evidence From a Prospective Study in India.","authors":"Bhavya Bhavya, Ajay Kumar Shukla, Abhijit Rozatkar, Shubham Atal","doi":"10.1097/JCP.0000000000002162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bipolar I disorder is frequently accompanied by persistent cognitive dysfunction, but the extent to which routine pharmacological treatment influences subjective and objective cognition remains unclear. We sought to examine short-term changes in cognitive functioning among euthymic bipolar I disorder patients receiving routine pharmacotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, adults with bipolar I disorder in euthymia (Young Mania Rating Scale ≤10; Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ≤7) underwent cognitive assessment using the Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at baseline and again after 3 to 4 months. Medication regimens, dose stability, adherence, and clinical variables were recorded. Paired tests evaluated within-subject cognitive change; categorical shifts were examined using the McNemar test. Limitations related to study design were explicitly evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one participants were enrolled (median age 39 years), and 50 completed follow-up. COBRA scores improved from 7.48±7.13 to 4.04±5.94 (mean change -3.44; P <0.001), and MoCA scores increased from 23.90±4.89 to 25.84±4.40 (mean change +1.94; P <0.001). The proportion with normal cognition increased from 42% to 78% on MoCA, while COBRA-defined impairment decreased from 20% to 6%. Improvements were observed across medication classes, and no regimen demonstrated consistent superiority.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine pharmacological treatment was associated with short-term cognitive improvement, but the findings are preliminary and not causal.</p>","PeriodicalId":15455,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"420-426"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000002162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Bipolar I disorder is frequently accompanied by persistent cognitive dysfunction, but the extent to which routine pharmacological treatment influences subjective and objective cognition remains unclear. We sought to examine short-term changes in cognitive functioning among euthymic bipolar I disorder patients receiving routine pharmacotherapy.
Methods: In this prospective observational study, adults with bipolar I disorder in euthymia (Young Mania Rating Scale ≤10; Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ≤7) underwent cognitive assessment using the Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at baseline and again after 3 to 4 months. Medication regimens, dose stability, adherence, and clinical variables were recorded. Paired tests evaluated within-subject cognitive change; categorical shifts were examined using the McNemar test. Limitations related to study design were explicitly evaluated.
Results: Fifty-one participants were enrolled (median age 39 years), and 50 completed follow-up. COBRA scores improved from 7.48±7.13 to 4.04±5.94 (mean change -3.44; P <0.001), and MoCA scores increased from 23.90±4.89 to 25.84±4.40 (mean change +1.94; P <0.001). The proportion with normal cognition increased from 42% to 78% on MoCA, while COBRA-defined impairment decreased from 20% to 6%. Improvements were observed across medication classes, and no regimen demonstrated consistent superiority.
Conclusions: Routine pharmacological treatment was associated with short-term cognitive improvement, but the findings are preliminary and not causal.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, a leading publication in psychopharmacology, offers a wide range of articles reporting on clinical trials and studies, side effects, drug interactions, overdose management, pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and psychiatric effects of non-psychiatric drugs. The journal keeps clinician-scientists and trainees up-to-date on the latest clinical developments in psychopharmacologic agents, presenting the extensive coverage needed to keep up with every development in this fast-growing field.