Diagnostic and prognostic value of (cone-beam) computed tomography in dental sleep medicine for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Janine Sambale, Janine Hass, Ulrich Koehler, Susanne Waldmann, Heike Maria Korbmacher-Steiner
{"title":"Diagnostic and prognostic value of (cone-beam) computed tomography in dental sleep medicine for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review.","authors":"Janine Sambale, Janine Hass, Ulrich Koehler, Susanne Waldmann, Heike Maria Korbmacher-Steiner","doi":"10.1186/s13005-026-00609-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>STUDY OBJECTIVES: Determine whether cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) or computed tomography (CT) measurements of the upper airway, craniofacial structures and soft tissues provide diagnostic or prognostic value for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in dental sleep medicine. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov. Eligible studies until September 2025 included polysomnography or polygraphy confirmed OSA, CBCT- or CT-based measurements, and either PSG/PG-confirmed non-OSA controls, defined OSA severity strata or treatment responder classifications. Data were extracted for diagnostic and therapeutic studies and risk of bias was assessed with the QUIPS tool. RESULTS: Of 392 records, 11 met inclusion criteria (7 diagnostic, 4 therapeutic). Most were subject to high risk of bias and showed heterogeneity in imaging protocols, measurements and outcome definitions, with little adjustment for age, gender or body mass index. Individuals with OSA often had smaller retropalatal minimum cross-sectional area (CSAmin) whereas findings for retroglossal dimensions, total airway volume, skeletal morphology and soft-tissue measures were inconsistent and lacked clear correlation with disease severity. In therapeutic studies, upper-airway volume generally increased, but baseline CBCT- and CT-derived variables and treatment-related airway enlargement did not reliably distinguish responders from non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence does not support CBCT- and CT-derived airway, skeletal or soft-tissue parameter as useful tools for diagnosing and grading of OSA or predicting treatment response. Given the high radiation exposure associated with both modalities, routine CBCT or CT solely for OSA screening or outcome prediction in dental sleep medicine is not justified and should be limited to established guidelines or surgical planning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID CRD42024556837. </p>","PeriodicalId":12994,"journal":{"name":"Head & Face Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13063646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Face Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-026-00609-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Determine whether cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) or computed tomography (CT) measurements of the upper airway, craniofacial structures and soft tissues provide diagnostic or prognostic value for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in dental sleep medicine. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov. Eligible studies until September 2025 included polysomnography or polygraphy confirmed OSA, CBCT- or CT-based measurements, and either PSG/PG-confirmed non-OSA controls, defined OSA severity strata or treatment responder classifications. Data were extracted for diagnostic and therapeutic studies and risk of bias was assessed with the QUIPS tool. RESULTS: Of 392 records, 11 met inclusion criteria (7 diagnostic, 4 therapeutic). Most were subject to high risk of bias and showed heterogeneity in imaging protocols, measurements and outcome definitions, with little adjustment for age, gender or body mass index. Individuals with OSA often had smaller retropalatal minimum cross-sectional area (CSAmin) whereas findings for retroglossal dimensions, total airway volume, skeletal morphology and soft-tissue measures were inconsistent and lacked clear correlation with disease severity. In therapeutic studies, upper-airway volume generally increased, but baseline CBCT- and CT-derived variables and treatment-related airway enlargement did not reliably distinguish responders from non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence does not support CBCT- and CT-derived airway, skeletal or soft-tissue parameter as useful tools for diagnosing and grading of OSA or predicting treatment response. Given the high radiation exposure associated with both modalities, routine CBCT or CT solely for OSA screening or outcome prediction in dental sleep medicine is not justified and should be limited to established guidelines or surgical planning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID CRD42024556837.

锥形束计算机断层扫描在牙科睡眠医学中对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的诊断和预后价值:一项系统综述。
研究目的:确定锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)或计算机断层扫描(CT)测量上气道、颅面结构和软组织是否为牙科睡眠医学中的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)提供诊断或预后价值。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science和ClinicalTrials.gov进行全面检索。截至2025年9月的合格研究包括多导睡眠图或多导睡眠图证实的OSA、CBCT或基于ct的测量、PSG/ pg证实的非OSA对照、确定的OSA严重程度分层或治疗反应者分类。提取诊断和治疗研究的数据,并使用QUIPS工具评估偏倚风险。结果:392例记录中,11例符合纳入标准(7例诊断性,4例治疗性)。大多数研究存在高偏倚风险,在成像方案、测量方法和结果定义方面存在异质性,对年龄、性别或体重指数的调整很少。OSA患者通常腭后最小横截面积(CSAmin)较小,而舌后尺寸、气道总容积、骨骼形态和软组织测量结果不一致,缺乏与疾病严重程度的明确相关性。在治疗性研究中,上气道容积普遍增加,但基线CBCT和ct衍生变量以及治疗相关的气道扩大并不能可靠地区分反应者和无反应者。结论:现有证据不支持CBCT和ct衍生的气道、骨骼或软组织参数作为OSA诊断和分级或预测治疗反应的有用工具。考虑到两种方式的高辐射暴露,常规CBCT或CT单独用于OSA筛查或牙科睡眠医学的结果预测是不合理的,应限于既定的指导方针或手术计划。试验注册:prospero id crd42024556837。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Head & Face Medicine
Head & Face Medicine DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Head & Face Medicine is a multidisciplinary open access journal that publishes basic and clinical research concerning all aspects of cranial, facial and oral conditions. The journal covers all aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. It has been designed as a multidisciplinary journal for clinicians and researchers involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of diseases which affect the human head and face. The journal is wide-ranging, covering the development, aetiology, epidemiology and therapy of head and face diseases to the basic science that underlies these diseases. Management of head and face diseases includes all aspects of surgical and non-surgical treatments including psychopharmacological therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书