Early Therapeutic Response Predicts Outcome in Chronic Constipation: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study.

IF 1.7 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gastroenterology Research Pub Date : 2026-01-04 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI:10.14740/gr2071
Tadayuki Oshima, Seiji Futagami, Yoshimasa Tanaka, Mariko Hojo, Kimio Isshi, Kazuki Kakimoto, Yujiro Uchiyama, Hiroshi Iida, Atsushi Oshio, Koji Nakada
{"title":"Early Therapeutic Response Predicts Outcome in Chronic Constipation: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Tadayuki Oshima, Seiji Futagami, Yoshimasa Tanaka, Mariko Hojo, Kimio Isshi, Kazuki Kakimoto, Yujiro Uchiyama, Hiroshi Iida, Atsushi Oshio, Koji Nakada","doi":"10.14740/gr2071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic constipation, common in clinical practice, requires treatment to enhance quality of life and possibly extend life expectancy. However, predictors of treatment efficacy remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to identify factors predicting treatment success in patients with chronic constipation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, prospective observational study evaluated patients with moderate to severe chronic constipation using the Chronic Constipation-Therapeutic Efficacy and Satisfaction Test (CC-TEST) questionnaire. Symptoms were assessed before treatment and at 2 and 4 weeks post-treatment. Multivariate analyses identified predictive factors based on three treatment efficacy assessment criteria: patient's impression, numeric rating scale (NRS) for symptom intensity, and spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) frequency status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Constipation medications were administered to 97 patients, with significant symptom improvements observed at 2 and 4 weeks (CC-TEST). The greatest effects were seen in hard stools, difficulty in defecation, and infrequent bowel movements. In the multiple regression analysis, baseline clinical characteristics and symptom profiles were not significant predictors of treatment response. Incorporating 2-week treatment responsiveness revealed that non-responsiveness at 2 weeks (β = 0.487), and a lower stool symptom subscale score (β = -0.344), were associated with poorer patient's impression. For the NRS, non-responsiveness at 2 weeks (β = 0.279) was a significant predictor. For SBM, non-responsiveness at 2 weeks (β = -0.274) predicted outcomes. Including 2-week non-responsiveness improved the predictive accuracy for 4-week efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The therapeutic response at 2 weeks is the most significant predictor of subsequent treatment response at 4 weeks in patients with chronic constipation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"43-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12978407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr2071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic constipation, common in clinical practice, requires treatment to enhance quality of life and possibly extend life expectancy. However, predictors of treatment efficacy remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to identify factors predicting treatment success in patients with chronic constipation.

Methods: A multicenter, prospective observational study evaluated patients with moderate to severe chronic constipation using the Chronic Constipation-Therapeutic Efficacy and Satisfaction Test (CC-TEST) questionnaire. Symptoms were assessed before treatment and at 2 and 4 weeks post-treatment. Multivariate analyses identified predictive factors based on three treatment efficacy assessment criteria: patient's impression, numeric rating scale (NRS) for symptom intensity, and spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) frequency status.

Results: Constipation medications were administered to 97 patients, with significant symptom improvements observed at 2 and 4 weeks (CC-TEST). The greatest effects were seen in hard stools, difficulty in defecation, and infrequent bowel movements. In the multiple regression analysis, baseline clinical characteristics and symptom profiles were not significant predictors of treatment response. Incorporating 2-week treatment responsiveness revealed that non-responsiveness at 2 weeks (β = 0.487), and a lower stool symptom subscale score (β = -0.344), were associated with poorer patient's impression. For the NRS, non-responsiveness at 2 weeks (β = 0.279) was a significant predictor. For SBM, non-responsiveness at 2 weeks (β = -0.274) predicted outcomes. Including 2-week non-responsiveness improved the predictive accuracy for 4-week efficacy.

Conclusions: The therapeutic response at 2 weeks is the most significant predictor of subsequent treatment response at 4 weeks in patients with chronic constipation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

早期治疗反应预测慢性便秘的预后:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
背景:慢性便秘在临床实践中很常见,需要治疗以提高生活质量并可能延长预期寿命。然而,治疗效果的预测因素在很大程度上仍未被探索。本研究旨在确定预测慢性便秘患者治疗成功的因素。方法:一项多中心前瞻性观察性研究,使用慢性便秘治疗疗效和满意度测试(CC-TEST)问卷对中重度慢性便秘患者进行评估。在治疗前和治疗后2周和4周评估症状。多变量分析确定了基于三个治疗疗效评估标准的预测因素:患者印象、症状强度的数值评定量表(NRS)和自发排便(SBM)频率状态。结果:97例患者接受便秘药物治疗,在第2周和第4周(CC-TEST)观察到明显的症状改善。最大的影响出现在大便坚硬、排便困难和排便不频繁。在多元回归分析中,基线临床特征和症状特征不是治疗反应的显著预测因子。结合2周的治疗反应性显示,2周无反应性(β = 0.487)和较低的大便症状亚量表评分(β = -0.344)与患者较差的印象相关。对于NRS, 2周无反应性(β = 0.279)是显著的预测因子。对于SBM, 2周无反应(β = -0.274)预测预后。包括2周无反应性提高了4周疗效的预测准确性。结论:慢性便秘患者2周的治疗反应是4周后续治疗反应的最显著预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Research
Gastroenterology Research GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书