The Value of NBI in the Detection of Local Recurrences of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma After (Chemo)radiotherapy: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Jeroen M. Westra, Manon. A. Zwakenberg, Constanze Scholman, Bert van der Vegt, Jan Wedman, Inge Wegner, György B. Halmos, Boudewijn E. C. Plaat
{"title":"The Value of NBI in the Detection of Local Recurrences of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma After (Chemo)radiotherapy: A Randomised Controlled Trial","authors":"Jeroen M. Westra, Manon. A. Zwakenberg, Constanze Scholman, Bert van der Vegt, Jan Wedman, Inge Wegner, György B. Halmos, Boudewijn E. C. Plaat","doi":"10.1111/coa.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Detection of local recurrences after (chemo)radiotherapy (C)RT for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is challenging due to post-treatment mucosal changes. This study assessed the added diagnostic value of narrow band imaging (NBI) compared to white light imaging (WLI) during rigid endoscopy under general anaesthesia for recurrence detection. A secondary aim was to assess NBI's ability to detect tumour extension surrounding the suspected carcinoma, which remained undetected by WLI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective randomised controlled trial with 1:1 block randomisation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Single tertiary referral centre.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Ninety-four patients with a suspected local recurrence after (C)RT, randomised to WLI (<i>n</i> = 47) or WLI+NBI (<i>n</i> = 47).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and survival outcomes, with histopathology as reference standard.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A recurrence was histopathologically confirmed in 36 patients (38%). Surgeons judged lesions as highly suspected of malignancy in 48 patients (51%): 24 (50%) in each group. WLI yielded sensitivity 84.2%, specificity 71.4%, PPV 66.7%, and NPV 87.0%. WLI+NBI showed slightly lower sensitivity (75.0%) and specificity (66.7%), with PPV 62.5% and NPV 78.3%. Identification of Ni type V lesions alone significantly improved specificity, PPV and accuracy. No differences in disease-specific or overall survival were found between groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In previously irradiated patients, NBI provides marginal additional diagnostic value over WLI in detecting local recurrence of HNSCC. Isolated use of Ni type V as a malignancy marker improves specificity, PPV and accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":"51 4","pages":"529-537"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/coa.70097","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.70097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Detection of local recurrences after (chemo)radiotherapy (C)RT for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is challenging due to post-treatment mucosal changes. This study assessed the added diagnostic value of narrow band imaging (NBI) compared to white light imaging (WLI) during rigid endoscopy under general anaesthesia for recurrence detection. A secondary aim was to assess NBI's ability to detect tumour extension surrounding the suspected carcinoma, which remained undetected by WLI.
Design
Prospective randomised controlled trial with 1:1 block randomisation.
Setting
Single tertiary referral centre.
Participants
Ninety-four patients with a suspected local recurrence after (C)RT, randomised to WLI (n = 47) or WLI+NBI (n = 47).
Main Outcome Measures
Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and survival outcomes, with histopathology as reference standard.
Results
A recurrence was histopathologically confirmed in 36 patients (38%). Surgeons judged lesions as highly suspected of malignancy in 48 patients (51%): 24 (50%) in each group. WLI yielded sensitivity 84.2%, specificity 71.4%, PPV 66.7%, and NPV 87.0%. WLI+NBI showed slightly lower sensitivity (75.0%) and specificity (66.7%), with PPV 62.5% and NPV 78.3%. Identification of Ni type V lesions alone significantly improved specificity, PPV and accuracy. No differences in disease-specific or overall survival were found between groups.
Conclusion
In previously irradiated patients, NBI provides marginal additional diagnostic value over WLI in detecting local recurrence of HNSCC. Isolated use of Ni type V as a malignancy marker improves specificity, PPV and accuracy.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with:
current otorhinolaryngological practice
audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL
head and neck oncology
head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery
continuing medical education and ORL training
The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research.
Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject.
• Negative/null results
In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.