Trends and Impact of Clostridioides difficile Infection on Thirty-Day Readmissions and Outcomes Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Seven-Year National Analysis.

IF 2.5 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gastroenterology Research Pub Date : 2026-02-04 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI:10.14740/gr2099
Abhin Sapkota, Ninda Sherpa, Maria Grba, Fernando Sigala, Ernesto Luna, Gedion Yilma Amdetsion, Hemant R Mutneja, Vikram Kotwal
{"title":"Trends and Impact of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infection on Thirty-Day Readmissions and Outcomes Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Seven-Year National Analysis.","authors":"Abhin Sapkota, Ninda Sherpa, Maria Grba, Fernando Sigala, Ernesto Luna, Gedion Yilma Amdetsion, Hemant R Mutneja, Vikram Kotwal","doi":"10.14740/gr2099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI) is a common hospital-acquired infection, particularly seen among patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study aimed to assess the trends and impact of CDI on 30-day readmissions and outcomes in CABG patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis used the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2022. Patients undergoing CABG were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) procedure codes. Patients with CDI were identified using ICD-10 diagnosis codes. Multiple logistic regression was performed to adjust for confounding factors. Trend analysis was done.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,279,605 adult patients undergoing CABG were included, of whom 5,567 (0.44%) had concurrent CDI. Patients with CDI were older (mean age 68.6 vs. 66.3 years, P < 0.001) and had higher medical comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 3: 68.4% vs. 45.35%, P < 0.001). They also had significantly higher rates of 30-day readmissions (12.63% vs. 7.35%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.42), in-hospital mortality (11.64% vs. 2.58%, aOR, 2.72), and complications including cardiac arrest (7.56% vs. 2.04%, aOR, 2.55), cardiogenic shock (26.89% vs. 9.50%, aOR, 2.33), sepsis/septic shock (26.05% vs. 2.51%, aOR, 8.28), all with P < 0.001. Over the study period, there was a decline in CABG admissions. CDI incidence among CABG patients also declined with a parallel decline in 30-day readmissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who underwent CABG with concurrent CDI experienced greater readmission rates, mortality, periprocedural adverse events, and resource utilization. Further studies need to be done for possible interventions to reduce these outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"18-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12978412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr2099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a common hospital-acquired infection, particularly seen among patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study aimed to assess the trends and impact of CDI on 30-day readmissions and outcomes in CABG patients.

Methods: This retrospective analysis used the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2022. Patients undergoing CABG were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) procedure codes. Patients with CDI were identified using ICD-10 diagnosis codes. Multiple logistic regression was performed to adjust for confounding factors. Trend analysis was done.

Results: A total of 1,279,605 adult patients undergoing CABG were included, of whom 5,567 (0.44%) had concurrent CDI. Patients with CDI were older (mean age 68.6 vs. 66.3 years, P < 0.001) and had higher medical comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 3: 68.4% vs. 45.35%, P < 0.001). They also had significantly higher rates of 30-day readmissions (12.63% vs. 7.35%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.42), in-hospital mortality (11.64% vs. 2.58%, aOR, 2.72), and complications including cardiac arrest (7.56% vs. 2.04%, aOR, 2.55), cardiogenic shock (26.89% vs. 9.50%, aOR, 2.33), sepsis/septic shock (26.05% vs. 2.51%, aOR, 8.28), all with P < 0.001. Over the study period, there was a decline in CABG admissions. CDI incidence among CABG patients also declined with a parallel decline in 30-day readmissions.

Conclusions: Patients who underwent CABG with concurrent CDI experienced greater readmission rates, mortality, periprocedural adverse events, and resource utilization. Further studies need to be done for possible interventions to reduce these outcomes.

Abstract Image

艰难梭菌感染对冠状动脉搭桥术后30天再入院和预后的趋势和影响:一项为期7年的全国分析。
背景:艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是一种常见的医院获得性感染,尤其见于接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者。本研究旨在评估CDI对CABG患者30天再入院和预后的趋势和影响。方法:采用2016 - 2022年全国再入院数据库进行回顾性分析。采用国际疾病分类第10版(ICD-10)程序代码对行CABG的患者进行鉴定。使用ICD-10诊断代码对CDI患者进行识别。采用多元逻辑回归对混杂因素进行校正。进行趋势分析。结果:共纳入1,279,605例接受CABG的成人患者,其中5,567例(0.44%)合并CDI。CDI患者年龄较大(平均年龄68.6比66.3岁,P < 0.001),合并症发生率较高(Charlson合并症指数≥3:68.4%比45.35%,P < 0.001)。他们的30天再入院率(12.63% vs. 7.35%,调整优势比(aOR), 1.42)、住院死亡率(11.64% vs. 2.58%, aOR, 2.72)和并发症包括心脏骤停(7.56% vs. 2.04%, aOR, 2.55)、心源性休克(26.89% vs. 9.50%, aOR, 2.33)、脓毒症/感染性休克(26.05% vs. 2.51%, aOR, 8.28),均显著高于对照组,P < 0.001。在研究期间,冠状动脉搭桥术的入院率有所下降。CABG患者的CDI发生率也随着30天再入院率的下降而下降。结论:行CABG合并CDI的患者有更高的再入院率、死亡率、术中不良事件和资源利用率。需要进一步研究可能的干预措施以减少这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Research
Gastroenterology Research GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书