Shachar Guy Bressler, Dana Grunhaus, Mattan Hurevich, Assaf Friedler
{"title":"Methods for studying the effects of phosphorylation patterns in proteins.","authors":"Shachar Guy Bressler, Dana Grunhaus, Mattan Hurevich, Assaf Friedler","doi":"10.1042/BST20250137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Protein phosphorylation is one of the most common and versatile regulatory mechanisms in cells. Most human proteins are phosphorylated at multiple sites, giving rise to large numbers of possible phosphorylation patterns. Each phosphorylation pattern can lead to a different functional or pathological outcome. Yet, linking defined phosphorylation patterns to specific biological functions remains a major experimental challenge. In this review we describe the main strategies to study phosphorylation patterns at the protein and domain levels and highlight how they complement each other. We first discuss cellular approaches, including phosphomimetics, kinase-based assays, and genetic code expansion, which allow working in a native environment but have their significant drawbacks. We then describe in vitro methods, such as enzymatic phosphorylation and semi-synthetic phosphoproteins generated by ligation, which afford mechanistic insights but result in low yields and are difficult to scale for producing libraries. We focus on synthetic phosphopeptide libraries as tools that offer precise control over the number and position of phosphosites and are uniquely suited for systematic mapping of phosphorylation patterns. This comes at a price of not working at the protein level, but rather at the domain level. Peptide libraries are often used for preliminary identification of key phosphorylations, later studied in detail at the protein level. We conclude that ideally more than one method should be used and that these methods should not be viewed as competing but rather as complementary. A combined use of several of these approaches provides a practical toolbox for dissecting how phosphorylation patterns regulate protein behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":8841,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Society transactions","volume":"54 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13105408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Society transactions","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20250137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Protein phosphorylation is one of the most common and versatile regulatory mechanisms in cells. Most human proteins are phosphorylated at multiple sites, giving rise to large numbers of possible phosphorylation patterns. Each phosphorylation pattern can lead to a different functional or pathological outcome. Yet, linking defined phosphorylation patterns to specific biological functions remains a major experimental challenge. In this review we describe the main strategies to study phosphorylation patterns at the protein and domain levels and highlight how they complement each other. We first discuss cellular approaches, including phosphomimetics, kinase-based assays, and genetic code expansion, which allow working in a native environment but have their significant drawbacks. We then describe in vitro methods, such as enzymatic phosphorylation and semi-synthetic phosphoproteins generated by ligation, which afford mechanistic insights but result in low yields and are difficult to scale for producing libraries. We focus on synthetic phosphopeptide libraries as tools that offer precise control over the number and position of phosphosites and are uniquely suited for systematic mapping of phosphorylation patterns. This comes at a price of not working at the protein level, but rather at the domain level. Peptide libraries are often used for preliminary identification of key phosphorylations, later studied in detail at the protein level. We conclude that ideally more than one method should be used and that these methods should not be viewed as competing but rather as complementary. A combined use of several of these approaches provides a practical toolbox for dissecting how phosphorylation patterns regulate protein behavior.
期刊介绍:
Biochemical Society Transactions is the reviews journal of the Biochemical Society. Publishing concise reviews written by experts in the field, providing a timely snapshot of the latest developments across all areas of the molecular and cellular biosciences.
Elevating our authors’ ideas and expertise, each review includes a perspectives section where authors offer comment on the latest advances, a glimpse of future challenges and highlighting the importance of associated research areas in far broader contexts.