Suffocating neck hematoma in thyroidectomy: use of drains and perioperative risk factors in 1,334 surgeries.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Lucía Aragone, Paz Burbano, Adrian Cameron, Roque Adan, Daniel Pirchi
{"title":"Suffocating neck hematoma in thyroidectomy: use of drains and perioperative risk factors in 1,334 surgeries.","authors":"Lucía Aragone, Paz Burbano, Adrian Cameron, Roque Adan, Daniel Pirchi","doi":"10.4174/astr.2026.110.3.144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A Suffocating Neck Hematoma (Snh) Is A Rare But Potentially Fatal Surgical Complication Of Thyroidectomy. In An Effort To Reduce Its Incidence, Many Surgeons Opt For The Selective Use Of Drains. However, There Are No Studies Demonstrating The Benefit Of This Strategy. Therefore, The Use Of Drains Remains Controversial. Our Primary Outcome Is To Analyze The Utility Of Drainage For Snh After Thyroidectomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative retrospective study with a prospective case registry was conducted. All adult patients who underwent total-thyroidectomy or hemi-thyroidectomy from January 2014 to December 2023 in a high-volume center were included. Drains were placed selectively, based on the surgeon's decision. Demographic and perioperative variables were compared between patients who presented with SNH and those who did not and outcomes were compared between patients with or without drains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,334 surgeries were recorded during the study period. Three hundred thirty-eight patients (25.3%) had drains placed. Only 4 patients (0.3%) presented SNH, all from the drain group and all of whom required surgical reintervention. It was observed that only the presence of drains was statistically significantly associated with SNH (P = 0.004) and with reoperations (P = 0.004). No other perioperative factors were found to be statistically significantly related to SNH in our series.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our series, placement of drains after thyroidectomies did not prevent the development of SNH or its reoperation. No other perioperative variables were related to SNH. The selective use of drains after thyroidectomies has shown no clear benefit in our retrospective series.</p>","PeriodicalId":8071,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","volume":"110 3","pages":"144-148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12978862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2026.110.3.144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A Suffocating Neck Hematoma (Snh) Is A Rare But Potentially Fatal Surgical Complication Of Thyroidectomy. In An Effort To Reduce Its Incidence, Many Surgeons Opt For The Selective Use Of Drains. However, There Are No Studies Demonstrating The Benefit Of This Strategy. Therefore, The Use Of Drains Remains Controversial. Our Primary Outcome Is To Analyze The Utility Of Drainage For Snh After Thyroidectomies.

Methods: A comparative retrospective study with a prospective case registry was conducted. All adult patients who underwent total-thyroidectomy or hemi-thyroidectomy from January 2014 to December 2023 in a high-volume center were included. Drains were placed selectively, based on the surgeon's decision. Demographic and perioperative variables were compared between patients who presented with SNH and those who did not and outcomes were compared between patients with or without drains.

Results: A total of 1,334 surgeries were recorded during the study period. Three hundred thirty-eight patients (25.3%) had drains placed. Only 4 patients (0.3%) presented SNH, all from the drain group and all of whom required surgical reintervention. It was observed that only the presence of drains was statistically significantly associated with SNH (P = 0.004) and with reoperations (P = 0.004). No other perioperative factors were found to be statistically significantly related to SNH in our series.

Conclusion: In our series, placement of drains after thyroidectomies did not prevent the development of SNH or its reoperation. No other perioperative variables were related to SNH. The selective use of drains after thyroidectomies has shown no clear benefit in our retrospective series.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

甲状腺切除术中窒息性颈部血肿:1334例手术中引流管的使用及围手术期危险因素
目的:窒息性颈部血肿(Snh)是甲状腺切除术中一种罕见但可能致命的手术并发症。为了减少其发生率,许多外科医生选择选择性使用引流管。然而,没有研究证明这种策略的好处。因此,下水道的使用仍然存在争议。我们的主要结果是分析甲状腺切除术后引流治疗Snh的效用。方法:采用前瞻性病例登记的比较回顾性研究。所有2014年1月至2023年12月在大容量中心接受全甲状腺切除术或半甲状腺切除术的成年患者均被纳入研究。根据外科医生的决定,有选择地放置引流管。比较出现SNH和没有出现SNH的患者的人口学和围手术期变量,以及有无引流管的患者的结局。结果:研究期间共记录1334例手术。338例(25.3%)患者放置了引流管。仅有4例(0.3%)出现SNH,均来自引流组,且均需要手术再干预。我们观察到,只有引流管的存在与SNH (P = 0.004)和再手术(P = 0.004)有统计学意义上的相关性。在我们的研究中,没有发现其他围手术期因素与SNH有统计学意义。结论:在我们的研究中,甲状腺切除术后放置引流管并不能阻止SNH的发展和再手术。无其他围手术期变量与SNH相关。在我们的回顾性研究中,甲状腺切除术后选择性使用引流管并没有明显的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Manuscripts to the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research (Ann Surg Treat Res) should be written in English according to the instructions for authors. If the details are not described below, the style should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publications available at International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) website (http://www.icmje.org).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书