{"title":"Clinical efficacy and prognostic factors of endoscopic surgery for chronic suppurative otitis media: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Hao He, A Heng Wang, Yu Wu, Zhengping Xia","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2026.2641824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is a significant global health concern, leading to persistent ear discharge and hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of EES for CSOM and to identify independent prognostic factors influencing surgical success.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective cohort study, 180 patients undergoing EES for CSOM between 2022 and 2024 were enrolled. Data on demographics, clinical profiles, and surgical details were collected. Primary outcomes included dry ear rate, pure-tone average (PTA) improvement, and complications at 6 months post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 6-month dry ear rate was 91.1%. Mean PTA improved significantly by 24.8 ± 7.2 dB. The complication rate was 3.9%. Multivariate analysis identified cholesteatoma (HR = 3.24, 95% CI: 1.85-5.68, <i>p</i> < 0.001), disease duration >5 years (HR = 2.52, 95% CI: 1.45-4.38, <i>p</i> = 0.001), and preoperative PTA >50 dB (HR = 2.89, 95% CI: 1.65-5.06, <i>p</i> < 0.001) as independent risk factors for failure. Subgroup analyses confirmed the consistency of these factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>Endoscopic ear surgery is an effective and safe treatment for CSOM in the mid-term (6-month) follow-up. Cholesteatoma, prolonged disease duration, and severe preoperative hearing loss are robust predictors of poorer outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":" ","pages":"917-924"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2026.2641824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is a significant global health concern, leading to persistent ear discharge and hearing loss.
Aims/objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of EES for CSOM and to identify independent prognostic factors influencing surgical success.
Materials and methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, 180 patients undergoing EES for CSOM between 2022 and 2024 were enrolled. Data on demographics, clinical profiles, and surgical details were collected. Primary outcomes included dry ear rate, pure-tone average (PTA) improvement, and complications at 6 months post-surgery.
Results: The 6-month dry ear rate was 91.1%. Mean PTA improved significantly by 24.8 ± 7.2 dB. The complication rate was 3.9%. Multivariate analysis identified cholesteatoma (HR = 3.24, 95% CI: 1.85-5.68, p < 0.001), disease duration >5 years (HR = 2.52, 95% CI: 1.45-4.38, p = 0.001), and preoperative PTA >50 dB (HR = 2.89, 95% CI: 1.65-5.06, p < 0.001) as independent risk factors for failure. Subgroup analyses confirmed the consistency of these factors.
Conclusions and significance: Endoscopic ear surgery is an effective and safe treatment for CSOM in the mid-term (6-month) follow-up. Cholesteatoma, prolonged disease duration, and severe preoperative hearing loss are robust predictors of poorer outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.