Assessing analytical techniques for wood metabolomics through a comparison of DART-TOFMS and GC×GC-TOFMS for species-level wood identification

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Seo Lin Nam, Erin R. Price, Martin Williams, Isabelle Duchesne, Nathalie Isabel, James J. Harynuk
{"title":"Assessing analytical techniques for wood metabolomics through a comparison of DART-TOFMS and GC×GC-TOFMS for species-level wood identification","authors":"Seo Lin Nam,&nbsp;Erin R. Price,&nbsp;Martin Williams,&nbsp;Isabelle Duchesne,&nbsp;Nathalie Isabel,&nbsp;James J. Harynuk","doi":"10.1007/s00226-026-01755-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Illegal logging poses a significant threat to ecosystems and undermines legal timber markets. Efforts to combat the issue are often hindered by the lack of robust tools for species-level wood authentication. Traditional methods such as anatomical observations and DNA analysis frequently struggle to achieve accurate species-level identification. Chemical profiling of wood metabolites has emerged as a promising alternative. Two powerful techniques, Direct Analysis in Real Time Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (DART-TOFMS) and Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS) offer unique strengths for wood identification. DART-TOFMS enables rapid chemical analysis with minimal sample preparation. GC×GC-TOFMS, known for its exceptional separation capabilities, allows for detailed chemical profiling that may enhance species-level discrimination. Despite their potential, direct comparisons of these two techniques for species-level classification have not been done yet. In this study, we present a comparative analysis using 60 wood core samples from two <i>Quercus</i> (Oak) species and 60 stemwood samples from three <i>Picea</i> (Spruce) species. Each sample was analyzed using both DART-TOFMS and GC×GC-TOFMS. Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) was employed for classification modeling, with feature selection based on VIP scores. Our results show that both techniques demonstrated strong classification performance in differentiating both <i>Quercus</i> and <i>Picea</i> species. Notably, GC×GC-TOFMS yielded slightly higher classification accuracy in this study, which may be attributed to its enhanced separation capabilities and ability to resolve structurally similar compounds such as isomers. The findings from this work will contribute to a deeper understanding of the capabilities of both techniques in wood metabolomics, with applications in forensic science and efforts to combat illegal logging.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":810,"journal":{"name":"Wood Science and Technology","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wood Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00226-026-01755-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Illegal logging poses a significant threat to ecosystems and undermines legal timber markets. Efforts to combat the issue are often hindered by the lack of robust tools for species-level wood authentication. Traditional methods such as anatomical observations and DNA analysis frequently struggle to achieve accurate species-level identification. Chemical profiling of wood metabolites has emerged as a promising alternative. Two powerful techniques, Direct Analysis in Real Time Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (DART-TOFMS) and Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS) offer unique strengths for wood identification. DART-TOFMS enables rapid chemical analysis with minimal sample preparation. GC×GC-TOFMS, known for its exceptional separation capabilities, allows for detailed chemical profiling that may enhance species-level discrimination. Despite their potential, direct comparisons of these two techniques for species-level classification have not been done yet. In this study, we present a comparative analysis using 60 wood core samples from two Quercus (Oak) species and 60 stemwood samples from three Picea (Spruce) species. Each sample was analyzed using both DART-TOFMS and GC×GC-TOFMS. Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) was employed for classification modeling, with feature selection based on VIP scores. Our results show that both techniques demonstrated strong classification performance in differentiating both Quercus and Picea species. Notably, GC×GC-TOFMS yielded slightly higher classification accuracy in this study, which may be attributed to its enhanced separation capabilities and ability to resolve structurally similar compounds such as isomers. The findings from this work will contribute to a deeper understanding of the capabilities of both techniques in wood metabolomics, with applications in forensic science and efforts to combat illegal logging.

通过比较DART-TOFMS和GC×GC-TOFMS来评估木材代谢组学的分析技术,用于树种水平的木材鉴定
非法采伐对生态系统构成严重威胁,破坏了合法的木材市场。打击这一问题的努力往往因缺乏物种一级木材认证的有力工具而受到阻碍。传统的方法,如解剖观察和DNA分析,往往难以实现准确的物种水平鉴定。木材代谢物的化学分析已成为一种有前途的替代方法。两种强大的技术,直接分析实时飞行时间质谱法(DART-TOFMS)和综合二维气相色谱飞行时间质谱法(GC×GC-TOFMS)为木材识别提供了独特的优势。DART-TOFMS能够以最少的样品制备进行快速化学分析。GC×GC-TOFMS,以其卓越的分离能力而闻名,允许进行详细的化学分析,这可能会提高物种水平的歧视。尽管这两种技术具有很大的潜力,但目前还没有对它们进行直接比较。在这项研究中,我们对来自两种栎(栎)种的60个木芯样本和来自三种云杉(云杉)种的60个茎材样本进行了比较分析。每个样品都使用DART-TOFMS和GC×GC-TOFMS进行分析。采用偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)进行分类建模,并根据VIP评分进行特征选择。结果表明,这两种方法在栎属和云杉属的分类中均表现出较强的分类性能。值得注意的是,GC×GC-TOFMS在本研究中产生了稍高的分类准确性,这可能归因于其增强的分离能力和分解结构相似化合物(如异构体)的能力。这项工作的发现将有助于更深入地了解这两种技术在木材代谢组学中的能力,并将其应用于法医科学和打击非法采伐的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wood Science and Technology
Wood Science and Technology 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Wood Science and Technology publishes original scientific research results and review papers covering the entire field of wood material science, wood components and wood based products. Subjects are wood biology and wood quality, wood physics and physical technologies, wood chemistry and chemical technologies. Latest advances in areas such as cell wall and wood formation; structural and chemical composition of wood and wood composites and their property relations; physical, mechanical and chemical characterization and relevant methodological developments, and microbiological degradation of wood and wood based products are reported. Topics related to wood technology include machining, gluing, and finishing, composite technology, wood modification, wood mechanics, creep and rheology, and the conversion of wood into pulp and biorefinery products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书