APPLE-POPDYN: an individual-based model linking apple-tree productivity and leaf miner infestation dynamics

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Felix Sauke, Katrin M. Meyer, Sylvain Pincebourde, Kerstin Wiegand
{"title":"APPLE-POPDYN: an individual-based model linking apple-tree productivity and leaf miner infestation dynamics","authors":"Felix Sauke,&nbsp;Katrin M. Meyer,&nbsp;Sylvain Pincebourde,&nbsp;Kerstin Wiegand","doi":"10.1007/s11829-026-10233-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The extent of crop damage caused by insect pests is economically significant and largely determined by the host selection behavior of individual pest species. According to the plant vigor hypothesis, herbivorous insects prefer vital over stressed plant parts. However, the feedbacks between insect behavior, plant performance, and insect population dynamics remain poorly understood. We developed the individual-based model APPLE-POPDYN to explore how different insect oviposition strategies affect apple tree productivity and insect phenology—feedbacks that are challenging to disentangle with experimental studies alone. The model is based on the interaction between the spotted tentiform leaf miner (<i>Phyllonorycter blancardella</i>) and its host, the apple (<i>Malus domestica</i>). It allows for controlled modification of behavioral traits, thereby enabling a systematic investigation of these interactions. The model includes the generation of meteorological pseudo data, apple tree growth, leaf-level oviposition behavior, and insect population dynamics. APPLE-POPDYN distinguishes between “picky” insects that prefer vigorous leaves and “tolerant” insects that do not discriminate. Picky insects develop faster but spend more time searching for suitable leaves. As a result, they produce more generations per year but achieve lower population sizes and cause less overall damage than tolerant insects. Additionally, increasing infestation levels reduce leaf vigor, negatively feeding back on host attractiveness. Our findings suggest that adaptive insect behavior does not necessarily lead to higher population sizes and provide new insights into the ecological dynamics of plant–insect interactions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8409,"journal":{"name":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","volume":"20 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11829-026-10233-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11829-026-10233-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extent of crop damage caused by insect pests is economically significant and largely determined by the host selection behavior of individual pest species. According to the plant vigor hypothesis, herbivorous insects prefer vital over stressed plant parts. However, the feedbacks between insect behavior, plant performance, and insect population dynamics remain poorly understood. We developed the individual-based model APPLE-POPDYN to explore how different insect oviposition strategies affect apple tree productivity and insect phenology—feedbacks that are challenging to disentangle with experimental studies alone. The model is based on the interaction between the spotted tentiform leaf miner (Phyllonorycter blancardella) and its host, the apple (Malus domestica). It allows for controlled modification of behavioral traits, thereby enabling a systematic investigation of these interactions. The model includes the generation of meteorological pseudo data, apple tree growth, leaf-level oviposition behavior, and insect population dynamics. APPLE-POPDYN distinguishes between “picky” insects that prefer vigorous leaves and “tolerant” insects that do not discriminate. Picky insects develop faster but spend more time searching for suitable leaves. As a result, they produce more generations per year but achieve lower population sizes and cause less overall damage than tolerant insects. Additionally, increasing infestation levels reduce leaf vigor, negatively feeding back on host attractiveness. Our findings suggest that adaptive insect behavior does not necessarily lead to higher population sizes and provide new insights into the ecological dynamics of plant–insect interactions.

APPLE-POPDYN:一个以个体为基础的模型,将苹果树的生产力和叶螨侵染动态联系起来
害虫对作物的危害程度在经济上具有重要意义,在很大程度上取决于害虫个体的寄主选择行为。根据植物活力假说,草食性昆虫更喜欢植物的重要部分而不是受胁迫的部分。然而,昆虫行为、植物性能和昆虫种群动态之间的反馈关系仍然知之甚少。我们开发了基于个体的模型apple - popdyn,以探索不同的昆虫产卵策略如何影响苹果树的生产力和昆虫物候反馈,这是单独用实验研究难以解决的问题。该模型是基于斑点网状叶螨(Phyllonorycter blancardella)和它的宿主苹果(Malus domestica)之间的相互作用。它允许对行为特征进行可控的修改,从而能够对这些相互作用进行系统的调查。该模型包括气象伪数据的生成、苹果树生长、叶片水平产卵行为和昆虫种群动态。APPLE-POPDYN区分了“挑食”昆虫和“宽容”昆虫,前者喜欢有活力的叶子,后者不区分。挑食的昆虫发育得更快,但花更多的时间寻找合适的叶子。因此,它们每年产生更多的世代,但种群规模较小,造成的总体损害也比耐虫小。此外,虫害水平的增加会降低叶片活力,负反馈给寄主吸引力。我们的研究结果表明,适应性昆虫行为并不一定导致更高的种群规模,并为植物-昆虫相互作用的生态动力学提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthropod-Plant Interactions
Arthropod-Plant Interactions 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Arthropod-Plant Interactions is dedicated to publishing high quality original papers and reviews with a broad fundamental or applied focus on ecological, biological, and evolutionary aspects of the interactions between insects and other arthropods with plants. Coverage extends to all aspects of such interactions including chemical, biochemical, genetic, and molecular analysis, as well reporting on multitrophic studies, ecophysiology, and mutualism. Arthropod-Plant Interactions encourages the submission of forum papers that challenge prevailing hypotheses. The journal encourages a diversity of opinion by presenting both invited and unsolicited review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书