Quantification of aboveground and belowground biomass and associated organic carbon in two olive cultivars (Arbosana and Picual) grown at high density

IF 2.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
Trees Pub Date : 2026-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s00468-026-02760-z
Milagros Torrús-Castillo, Gema Guzmán, Belén Cárceles, María-Auxiliadora Soriano, Raúl de la Rosa, José A. Gómez
{"title":"Quantification of aboveground and belowground biomass and associated organic carbon in two olive cultivars (Arbosana and Picual) grown at high density","authors":"Milagros Torrús-Castillo,&nbsp;Gema Guzmán,&nbsp;Belén Cárceles,&nbsp;María-Auxiliadora Soriano,&nbsp;Raúl de la Rosa,&nbsp;José A. Gómez","doi":"10.1007/s00468-026-02760-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Accurate quantification of biomass and carbon accumulation in olives is crucial for optimizing agronomic management and assessing their role to climate change mitigation. This study, developed destructive and non-destructive methodologies to quantify above- and belowground biomass and carbon content in 7.5-year-old trees of two common olive cultivars (<i>Arbosana</i> and <i>Picual)</i> under Mediterranean conditions. The approach included the removal of three whole-trees per cultivar and combined assessment of above- and belowground biomass, rarely available for olive trees. <i>Picual</i> tended to accumulate more biomass (36.5 kg tree<sup>−1</sup>, on average) than <i>Arbosana</i> (27.5 kg tree<sup>−1</sup>), due to a greater investment in trunk and non-primary branches, whereas <i>Arbosana</i> allocated more biomass to leaves. In both cultivars, around 60% of the root biomass was within the top 25 cm of soil, and over 55% was concentrated in the root ball. Weighted average carbon concentration was 47% in aboveground biomass and 42% in roots. At the orchard scale, soil was the main organic carbon pool, around 76 t C ha<sup>−1</sup>, compared to 13–16 t C ha<sup>−1</sup> in the tree biomass. Annual carbon accumulation in olive biomass ranged from 1.68 t C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (<i>Arbosana</i>) to 2.16 t C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (<i>Picual</i>), within the range of C fixation rates in Mediterranean agroecosystems. Destructive sampling better captured cultivar differences in biomass allocation and carbon accumulation, while the non-destructive method proved suitable for large-scale use. These results support integrating biomass allocation and carbon permanence into cultivar selection and management to enhance carbon sequestration and sustainability of olive grove systems.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":805,"journal":{"name":"Trees","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00468-026-02760-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00468-026-02760-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate quantification of biomass and carbon accumulation in olives is crucial for optimizing agronomic management and assessing their role to climate change mitigation. This study, developed destructive and non-destructive methodologies to quantify above- and belowground biomass and carbon content in 7.5-year-old trees of two common olive cultivars (Arbosana and Picual) under Mediterranean conditions. The approach included the removal of three whole-trees per cultivar and combined assessment of above- and belowground biomass, rarely available for olive trees. Picual tended to accumulate more biomass (36.5 kg tree−1, on average) than Arbosana (27.5 kg tree−1), due to a greater investment in trunk and non-primary branches, whereas Arbosana allocated more biomass to leaves. In both cultivars, around 60% of the root biomass was within the top 25 cm of soil, and over 55% was concentrated in the root ball. Weighted average carbon concentration was 47% in aboveground biomass and 42% in roots. At the orchard scale, soil was the main organic carbon pool, around 76 t C ha−1, compared to 13–16 t C ha−1 in the tree biomass. Annual carbon accumulation in olive biomass ranged from 1.68 t C ha−1 yr−1 (Arbosana) to 2.16 t C ha−1 yr−1 (Picual), within the range of C fixation rates in Mediterranean agroecosystems. Destructive sampling better captured cultivar differences in biomass allocation and carbon accumulation, while the non-destructive method proved suitable for large-scale use. These results support integrating biomass allocation and carbon permanence into cultivar selection and management to enhance carbon sequestration and sustainability of olive grove systems.

两个橄榄树品种(Arbosana和Picual)在高密度条件下地上和地下生物量及相关有机碳的定量研究
橄榄生物量和碳积累的准确量化对于优化农艺管理和评估其对减缓气候变化的作用至关重要。本研究开发了破坏性和非破坏性方法,在地中海条件下量化两种常见橄榄品种(Arbosana和Picual) 7.5年树龄的树的地上和地下生物量和碳含量。该方法包括每个品种去除三棵整棵树,并对地上和地下生物量进行综合评估,很少用于橄榄树。由于在树干和非初级枝上的投入更多,白杨的生物量积累(平均36.5 kg树−1)比紫杉树(27.5 kg树−1)更多,而紫杉树将更多的生物量分配给了叶片。在两个品种中,约60%的根生物量集中在土壤顶部25 cm内,超过55%的根生物量集中在根球中。地上生物量加权平均碳浓度为47%,根系加权平均碳浓度为42%。在果园尺度上,土壤是主要的有机碳库,约为76 t C ha - 1,而树木生物量为13-16 t C ha - 1。在地中海农业生态系统的碳固定率范围内,橄榄生物量的年碳积累从1.68 t C ha−1 yr−1 (Arbosana)到2.16 t C ha−1 yr−1 (Picual)不等。破坏性取样能较好地捕捉到品种间生物量分配和碳积累的差异,而非破坏性取样适合大规模应用。这些结果支持将生物量分配和碳持久性纳入品种选择和管理,以增强橄榄林系统的碳固存和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees
Trees 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Trees - Structure and Function publishes original articles on the physiology, biochemistry, functional anatomy, structure and ecology of trees and other woody plants. Also presented are articles concerned with pathology and technological problems, when they contribute to the basic understanding of structure and function of trees. In addition to original articles and short communications, the journal publishes reviews on selected topics concerning the structure and function of trees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书