Standalone middle meningeal artery embolization vs. surgical evacuation in chronic subdural hematoma: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.2 Q4 NEUROIMAGING
Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Bardia Hajikarimloo, Sai Sanikommu, Amirhossein Zare, Ali Mortezaei, Saba Aghajani, Ahmad Alagha, Misagh Iranpour, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Kivanc Yangi, Seyed Ali Mousavinejad, Farzan Fahim, Adam A Dmytriw, Redi Rahmani, Vratko Himic, Ricardo J Komotar, Khaled M Taghlabi, Amir H Faraji, Emade Jaman, Ahmed Abdelsalam, Ahmet Günkan, Peter Kan, Jason P Sheehan, Robert M Starke, Pascal Jabbour
{"title":"Standalone middle meningeal artery embolization vs. surgical evacuation in chronic subdural hematoma: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Bardia Hajikarimloo, Sai Sanikommu, Amirhossein Zare, Ali Mortezaei, Saba Aghajani, Ahmad Alagha, Misagh Iranpour, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Kivanc Yangi, Seyed Ali Mousavinejad, Farzan Fahim, Adam A Dmytriw, Redi Rahmani, Vratko Himic, Ricardo J Komotar, Khaled M Taghlabi, Amir H Faraji, Emade Jaman, Ahmed Abdelsalam, Ahmet Günkan, Peter Kan, Jason P Sheehan, Robert M Starke, Pascal Jabbour","doi":"10.1177/19714009261432000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundChronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) remains a prevalent neurosurgical condition in elderly patients, traditionally managed via surgical evacuation when symptomatic. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has recently emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. However, the comparative efficacy and safety of standalone MMAE versus standalone surgical evacuation remain inadequately defined.MethodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, was performed on March 20, 2025. Studies comparing standalone MMAE and standalone surgical evacuation in patients with cSDH were included. The primary outcome was recurrence; secondary outcomes included complication and mortality rates. A random-effects pairwise meta-analysis model using restricted maximum likelihood (REML) was applied to account for between-study variability.ResultsTen studies encompassing 50,138 patients were included. Recurrence was significantly lower with MMAE (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.80, p = .00), with no statistically detected heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), although clinical variability across studies cannot be excluded. Mortality (RR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.44-1.12, p = .14) and complications (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.67-1.64, p = .85) did not differ significantly between both groups. The GRADE assessment rated the certainty of evidence for recurrence as moderate, while the certainty for both mortality and complications were rated as very low, underscoring the need for further high-quality studies.ConclusionStandalone MMAE significantly reduces recurrence risk compared to surgical evacuation in cSDH patients, while showing no significant difference in mortality or complication rates. These findings highlight MMAE as a promising first-line treatment option, particularly for patients at high surgical risk. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to further validate these outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009261432000"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12979223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009261432000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundChronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) remains a prevalent neurosurgical condition in elderly patients, traditionally managed via surgical evacuation when symptomatic. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has recently emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. However, the comparative efficacy and safety of standalone MMAE versus standalone surgical evacuation remain inadequately defined.MethodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, was performed on March 20, 2025. Studies comparing standalone MMAE and standalone surgical evacuation in patients with cSDH were included. The primary outcome was recurrence; secondary outcomes included complication and mortality rates. A random-effects pairwise meta-analysis model using restricted maximum likelihood (REML) was applied to account for between-study variability.ResultsTen studies encompassing 50,138 patients were included. Recurrence was significantly lower with MMAE (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.80, p = .00), with no statistically detected heterogeneity (I2 = 0%), although clinical variability across studies cannot be excluded. Mortality (RR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.44-1.12, p = .14) and complications (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.67-1.64, p = .85) did not differ significantly between both groups. The GRADE assessment rated the certainty of evidence for recurrence as moderate, while the certainty for both mortality and complications were rated as very low, underscoring the need for further high-quality studies.ConclusionStandalone MMAE significantly reduces recurrence risk compared to surgical evacuation in cSDH patients, while showing no significant difference in mortality or complication rates. These findings highlight MMAE as a promising first-line treatment option, particularly for patients at high surgical risk. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to further validate these outcomes.

单独脑膜中动脉栓塞与手术引流治疗慢性硬膜下血肿:一项全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:慢性硬膜下血肿(cSDH)在老年患者中仍然是一种常见的神经外科疾病,传统上,当出现症状时通过手术清除。中脑膜动脉栓塞术(MMAE)最近成为一种微创替代方法。然而,独立MMAE与独立手术抽吸的疗效和安全性的比较仍然没有充分的定义。方法综合检索2025年3月20日的PubMed、Scopus、Embase和Web of Science。包括比较cSDH患者独立MMAE和独立手术引流的研究。主要结局为复发;次要结局包括并发症和死亡率。采用限制最大似然(REML)的随机效应两两荟萃分析模型来解释研究间的可变性。结果纳入10项研究,共50138例患者。MMAE的复发率显著降低(RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.80, p = .00),尽管不能排除研究间的临床变异性,但未发现统计学上的异质性(I2 = 0%)。两组死亡率(RR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.44-1.12, p = 0.14)和并发症(RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.67-1.64, p = 0.85)差异无统计学意义。GRADE评估认为复发证据的确定性为中等,而死亡率和并发症的确定性均为极低,强调需要进一步的高质量研究。结论与手术引流相比,单独MMAE可显著降低cSDH患者的复发风险,但死亡率和并发症发生率无显著差异。这些发现强调MMAE是一种很有希望的一线治疗选择,特别是对于手术风险高的患者。前瞻性随机试验有必要进一步验证这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书