Clinical Validation of the Italian Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (I-MID).

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-10 DOI:10.1080/15299732.2026.2641647
Giuseppe Scimeca, Marianna Ardito, Monica Fiammetta, Jennifer A Madere, D Michael Coy, Giuseppe Giacalone
{"title":"Clinical Validation of the Italian Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (I-MID).","authors":"Giuseppe Scimeca, Marianna Ardito, Monica Fiammetta, Jennifer A Madere, D Michael Coy, Giuseppe Giacalone","doi":"10.1080/15299732.2026.2641647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the present study was to verify the reliability and validity of the Italian Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (I-MID) when applied to a clinical sample. The I-MID was administered to 100 outpatients presenting to a south-Italian public psychology service for psychotherapeutic treatment. Both self-report and interview-based methods were used to assess traumatic experiences and dissociative symptoms. The Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule DSM-5 Version (DDIS-5) was utilized to identify dissociative disorders and psychiatric diagnoses commonly associated with dissociative and symptoms and disorders. The I-MID showed strong internal consistency, structural, convergent, and construct validity. Results addressing temporal stability were good for the MID mean score, but results for the different scales were more variable across time. Discriminant validity was good, but some limitations imposed by the clinical sample prevented a sound evaluation of this test property. Information about construct and discriminant validity for the Italian versions of the Dissociative Experiences Scale-II (DES-II) and the Dissociative Symptom Scale (DSS) is also provided. All instruments exhibited good psychometric properties. However, the I-MID showed better incremental validity compared to the DES-II, and provided some evidence of enhanced discriminant validity relative to both the DES-II and DSS. The findings of this study support the validity of the MID and its underlying subjective-phenomenological model of dissociation in an Italian clinical sample. Finally, the prevalence of dissociative disorders in our outpatient sample aligned with findings from other countries' epidemiological studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":" ","pages":"279-299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2026.2641647","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to verify the reliability and validity of the Italian Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (I-MID) when applied to a clinical sample. The I-MID was administered to 100 outpatients presenting to a south-Italian public psychology service for psychotherapeutic treatment. Both self-report and interview-based methods were used to assess traumatic experiences and dissociative symptoms. The Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule DSM-5 Version (DDIS-5) was utilized to identify dissociative disorders and psychiatric diagnoses commonly associated with dissociative and symptoms and disorders. The I-MID showed strong internal consistency, structural, convergent, and construct validity. Results addressing temporal stability were good for the MID mean score, but results for the different scales were more variable across time. Discriminant validity was good, but some limitations imposed by the clinical sample prevented a sound evaluation of this test property. Information about construct and discriminant validity for the Italian versions of the Dissociative Experiences Scale-II (DES-II) and the Dissociative Symptom Scale (DSS) is also provided. All instruments exhibited good psychometric properties. However, the I-MID showed better incremental validity compared to the DES-II, and provided some evidence of enhanced discriminant validity relative to both the DES-II and DSS. The findings of this study support the validity of the MID and its underlying subjective-phenomenological model of dissociation in an Italian clinical sample. Finally, the prevalence of dissociative disorders in our outpatient sample aligned with findings from other countries' epidemiological studies.

意大利多维解离量表的临床验证。
本研究的目的是验证的可靠性和有效性意大利多维库存分离(I-MID)时,应用于临床样本。I-MID对100名到意大利南部公共心理服务机构接受心理治疗的门诊患者进行了管理。采用自我报告和基于访谈的方法来评估创伤经历和分离症状。分离性障碍访谈表DSM-5版(DDIS-5)用于识别分离性障碍和通常与分离、症状和障碍相关的精神病学诊断。I-MID具有较强的内部一致性、结构性、收敛性和结构效度。处理时间稳定性的结果对MID平均得分有利,但不同量表的结果在时间上变化更大。判别效度很好,但临床样本施加的一些限制阻碍了对该测试特性的合理评估。本文还提供了意大利语版解离体验量表(DES-II)和解离症状量表(DSS)的结构和判别效度信息。所有仪器均表现出良好的心理测量特性。然而,与DES-II相比,I-MID显示出更好的增量效度,并且提供了相对于DES-II和DSS增强的区别效度的证据。本研究的结果支持MID的有效性和其潜在的主观现象学模型的分离在意大利临床样本。最后,我们门诊样本中解离性障碍的患病率与其他国家的流行病学研究结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书